Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 02:50:46
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Anpu42 wrote: adamsouza wrote:
Centurions with Blood Claws
Scouts with winged jump packs
a new sculpt of Lord Mephiston
So you want to strap young Space Wolves to your arms?
If it means we get updated, ill strap about anything to my arms, lol
|
5,000
:cficon: 1,500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 03:27:49
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
MajorStoffer wrote:The only consistent "fact" about GW update cycles is the core Space Marine book will be updated for every edition, and they loosely follow a scheme where they update older books first, but it's by no means a certainty.
Did Guard need an update before Orks? Absolutely not, did the Space Wolves need an update before DE or BA? Nope, still happens.
They do what they want for whatever reason, BA hold the dubious distinction of being either the last or 2nd to last codex to be updated, and probably won't get a major revamp. I expect new plastic assault marines, and maybe one new unit, and then on to trying to right the sinking Fantasy ship.
doubtlessly with more of the stuff which is wrecking 40k.
Ok even as a Blood Angel person I got to call BS on this one. Dark Eldar was a complete Joke and Space Wolf's did not even have a flier in there codex it was so old. Both of those needed an update. I have 3 main armies Blood angels, Space Wolf's and Sisters of Battle. Now if we wish to talk about some real hate from GW Look at that list of those 3 which one do you think gets shafted ever edition. If i need to pull that one out and explain it then please let me know. Does your rock have electricity? Blood Angel had one of the best dexes for a long time I think Eldar was by far the worst when i started and was till 5th even then it was semi good till the latest one which is wtf over powered. Now think about this one if they hit all the other dexes so hard wtf you think is about to happen to tau and eldar. Those 2 are gonna get hit so bad the forums will be screaming till the next edition.
|
Some Must Be Told. Others Must Be Shown.
Blood Angels- 15000
Dark Angels-7800
Sisters of Battle- 5000
Space Wolves- 5000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 04:36:48
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Blood angels were good in 5th ed, okay in 6th until space marines hit, fairly bad after that, and a joke now. I want to be wrong on this, its just a gut feeling backed up by evidence provided by GWs recent releases. If im wrong, and we get BA next month, then i will come back to this thread and apologize. But i highly doubt that we will have our update by the end of january, and if we dont have it by then, well you can kiss your dreams of a new codex goodbye until 8th edition 40k.
|
5,000
:cficon: 1,500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 05:04:21
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Blood-Drenched Death Company Marine
|
Given the current release pace 8th edition will be released next spring anyway.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 06:34:55
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No. They'll appear eventually. GW is in a mad dash to release as much stuff as they can to try and keep sales up desperately. They'll give a codex to anything by this point.
|
My Armies:
5,500pts
2,700pts
2,000pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 06:42:16
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Prophetic Blood Angel Librarian
|
Fireraven wrote: MajorStoffer wrote:The only consistent "fact" about GW update cycles is the core Space Marine book will be updated for every edition, and they loosely follow a scheme where they update older books first, but it's by no means a certainty.
Did Guard need an update before Orks? Absolutely not, did the Space Wolves need an update before DE or BA? Nope, still happens.
They do what they want for whatever reason, BA hold the dubious distinction of being either the last or 2nd to last codex to be updated, and probably won't get a major revamp. I expect new plastic assault marines, and maybe one new unit, and then on to trying to right the sinking Fantasy ship.
doubtlessly with more of the stuff which is wrecking 40k.
Ok even as a Blood Angel person I got to call BS on this one. Dark Eldar was a complete Joke and Space Wolf's did not even have a flier in there codex it was so old. Both of those needed an update. I have 3 main armies Blood angels, Space Wolf's and Sisters of Battle. Now if we wish to talk about some real hate from GW Look at that list of those 3 which one do you think gets shafted ever edition. If i need to pull that one out and explain it then please let me know. Does your rock have electricity? Blood Angel had one of the best dexes for a long time I think Eldar was by far the worst when i started and was till 5th even then it was semi good till the latest one which is wtf over powered. Now think about this one if they hit all the other dexes so hard wtf you think is about to happen to tau and eldar. Those 2 are gonna get hit so bad the forums will be screaming till the next edition.
Haha I cannot wait to hear the whimpers of those few eldar players (its not the majority), who have kept claiming the eldar dex is not OP and we just need to 'play better'. It will be worth waiting years for.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 06:53:34
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Haha. Thats entertaining.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 12:47:33
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
Anpu42 wrote: adamsouza wrote:
Centurions with Blood Claws
Scouts with winged jump packs
a new sculpt of Lord Mephiston
So you want to strap young Space Wolves to your arms?
Brain fart on my part, but I think you have something going on there with that idea.
Strapping a young space wolf to your arm should be worth at least a 4++ save
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 13:11:15
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Its like the grey knight force requisition in the space wolf dex, Im pretty sure blood angels are next.
|
Rick Priestley said it best:
Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! The modern studio isn’t a studio in the same way; it isn’t a collection of artists and creatives sharing ideas and driving each other on. It’s become the promotions department of a toy company – things move on!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 13:38:42
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Ravenous D wrote:
Its like the grey knight force requisition in the space wolf dex, Im pretty sure blood angels are next.
I think BA will come before Christmas.
People will have more money to spend and BA will become a big Christmas deal.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 13:57:40
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
wuestenfux wrote:
I think BA will come before Christmas.
People will have more money to spend and BA will become a big Christmas deal.
I can see that.
The current release schedule is pure anarchy just releasing things whenever they feel like it. After xmas is usually a guaranteed 40k release but who knows any more, GWs desperate thrashing isn't helping anyone.
|
Rick Priestley said it best:
Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! The modern studio isn’t a studio in the same way; it isn’t a collection of artists and creatives sharing ideas and driving each other on. It’s become the promotions department of a toy company – things move on!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 14:03:57
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Gargantuan Gargant
|
Rumors point to Nurgle throughout October with Necrons getting a Halloween release. I'd imagine we'll see Blood Angels in November.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 15:52:42
Subject: Re:Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
|
Poly Ranger wrote:
Haha I cannot wait to hear the whimpers of those few eldar players (its not the majority), who have kept claiming the eldar dex is not OP and we just need to 'play better'. It will be worth waiting years for.
By those few Eldar players, you mean Morgoth?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/06 17:50:23
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
adamsouza wrote: Anpu42 wrote: adamsouza wrote:
Centurions with Blood Claws
Scouts with winged jump packs
a new sculpt of Lord Mephiston
So you want to strap young Space Wolves to your arms?
Brain fart on my part, but I think you have something going on there with that idea.
Strapping a young space wolf to your arm should be worth at least a 4++ save
Be pretty itchy and mangy though.
Does anyone even know who this "super reliable" belloflostsouls source was?
|
5,000
:cficon: 1,500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 05:49:25
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
GW won't shelve BA, that's a ludicrous suggestion.
We'll see them before Xmas, although I hope they're not the December release as that's one month where I'm guaranteed to have less disposable income.
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 07:33:17
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
Blood Angels aren't shelved, just haven't been released yet. There are two armies left with to be updated, Necrons and Blood Angels. Let's start worrying about Blood Angels being shelved when we start seeing the hardcover codexes being replaced without a Blood Angels codex.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 08:12:49
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
diepotato47 wrote:Blood Angels aren't shelved, just haven't been released yet. There are two armies left with to be updated, Necrons and Blood Angels. Let's start worrying about Blood Angels being shelved when we start seeing the hardcover codexes being replaced without a Blood Angels codex.
Which is what im honestly expecting to happen, and what im afraid of.
|
5,000
:cficon: 1,500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 08:49:10
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Yes, GW decided to shelf one of the most popular armies (next to UM probably).. Someone has to be last on the list of codex updates and unfortunately BA made that list.
There is a 0% chance of BA ever being shelved.
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 09:14:41
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
th3maninblak wrote:diepotato47 wrote:Blood Angels aren't shelved, just haven't been released yet. There are two armies left with to be updated, Necrons and Blood Angels. Let's start worrying about Blood Angels being shelved when we start seeing the hardcover codexes being replaced without a Blood Angels codex.
Which is what im honestly expecting to happen, and what im afraid of.
No. Really not.
BA was one of the most popular 40k armies.
In the third edition it was the most successful behind Nids.
Incidently, Space Hulk fields exactly these armies.
I guess that BA will arrive before Xmas.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 10:36:47
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
soomemafia wrote:cyberjonesy wrote:Did nt bother to read through the first replies but has anyone mailed a box of tissues to this guy already?
I feel so sad that blood angels are nt completely overpowered anymore. Cant wait for their vehicles to be reduced in price again so as to make them completely imbalanced in line with wave serpents. This is exactly what 40k needs right now.
Please bother to think before you post... The claim that updating a bottom-tire army will automatically make them OP is pretty ridiculous and I seriously can't say if you're trolling or just ignorant.
Eldar were bottom tier before 6th edition codex dropped. Eldar players were a dying breed like the Eldar themselves now you can't go a week without seeing a serpent spam list (or even a "im not using serpents" eldar player trying to handicap himself by not taking any transports which just so happen to be overpowered tank equivalents for cheap) in the army list section or a thread about how OP or not OP or how to beat Wave Serpents or Wraithknights.
|
Proud supporter of
It is human nature to seek culpability in a time of tragedy. It is a sign of strength to cry out against fate, rather than to bow one's head and succumb.
-Gabriel Angelos |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 6016/10/07 10:43:24
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
th3maninblak wrote:diepotato47 wrote:Blood Angels aren't shelved, just haven't been released yet. There are two armies left with to be updated, Necrons and Blood Angels. Let's start worrying about Blood Angels being shelved when we start seeing the hardcover codexes being replaced without a Blood Angels codex.
Which is what im honestly expecting to happen, and what im afraid of.
Stop being so melodramatic !
The Warhammer Fest event T-shirt is Blood Angels (not Necrons, not Nurgle), I wouldn't be surprised if something was announced there this weekend.
That, coupled with the recent Space Hulk re-release means they're far from shelved.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 11:09:07
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
|
bocatt wrote: soomemafia wrote:cyberjonesy wrote:Did nt bother to read through the first replies but has anyone mailed a box of tissues to this guy already?
I feel so sad that blood angels are nt completely overpowered anymore. Cant wait for their vehicles to be reduced in price again so as to make them completely imbalanced in line with wave serpents. This is exactly what 40k needs right now.
Please bother to think before you post... The claim that updating a bottom-tire army will automatically make them OP is pretty ridiculous and I seriously can't say if you're trolling or just ignorant.
Eldar were bottom tier before 6th edition codex dropped. Eldar players were a dying breed like the Eldar themselves now you can't go a week without seeing a serpent spam list (or even a "im not using serpents" eldar player trying to handicap himself by not taking any transports which just so happen to be overpowered tank equivalents for cheap) in the army list section or a thread about how OP or not OP or how to beat Wave Serpents or Wraithknights.
Eldar was a subpar army (not bottom) in 5th.. That's it. All other editions you can care to think of, Eldar was always a top borderline broken power army.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 12:35:06
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Dour Wolf Priest with Iron Wolf Amulet
|
Zewrath wrote: bocatt wrote: soomemafia wrote:cyberjonesy wrote:Did nt bother to read through the first replies but has anyone mailed a box of tissues to this guy already?
I feel so sad that blood angels are nt completely overpowered anymore. Cant wait for their vehicles to be reduced in price again so as to make them completely imbalanced in line with wave serpents. This is exactly what 40k needs right now.
Please bother to think before you post... The claim that updating a bottom-tire army will automatically make them OP is pretty ridiculous and I seriously can't say if you're trolling or just ignorant.
Eldar were bottom tier before 6th edition codex dropped. Eldar players were a dying breed like the Eldar themselves now you can't go a week without seeing a serpent spam list (or even a "im not using serpents" eldar player trying to handicap himself by not taking any transports which just so happen to be overpowered tank equivalents for cheap) in the army list section or a thread about how OP or not OP or how to beat Wave Serpents or Wraithknights.
Eldar was a subpar army (not bottom) in 5th.. That's it. All other editions you can care to think of, Eldar was always a top borderline broken power army.
At the start of 6th, they were at the bottom until they got their new Dex. Tau, which had been the bottom for most of 5th, actually moved up when 6th released, even before their new Dex.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 13:28:11
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
|
Andilus Greatsword wrote: Zewrath wrote: bocatt wrote: soomemafia wrote:cyberjonesy wrote:Did nt bother to read through the first replies but has anyone mailed a box of tissues to this guy already?
I feel so sad that blood angels are nt completely overpowered anymore. Cant wait for their vehicles to be reduced in price again so as to make them completely imbalanced in line with wave serpents. This is exactly what 40k needs right now.
Please bother to think before you post... The claim that updating a bottom-tire army will automatically make them OP is pretty ridiculous and I seriously can't say if you're trolling or just ignorant.
Eldar were bottom tier before 6th edition codex dropped. Eldar players were a dying breed like the Eldar themselves now you can't go a week without seeing a serpent spam list (or even a "im not using serpents" eldar player trying to handicap himself by not taking any transports which just so happen to be overpowered tank equivalents for cheap) in the army list section or a thread about how OP or not OP or how to beat Wave Serpents or Wraithknights.
Eldar was a subpar army (not bottom) in 5th.. That's it. All other editions you can care to think of, Eldar was always a top borderline broken power army.
At the start of 6th, they were at the bottom until they got their new Dex. Tau, which had been the bottom for most of 5th, actually moved up when 6th released, even before their new Dex.
And? On the release of 6th edition, Croissant Necrons was god-tier army, followed by the atrociously powerful biomancy Nidzilla monster mashup. Heck, even IG was considered top due to the Vendetta and access to good and very sought after AA to counter the other aircraft a abusers. I find it difficult to see a point in comparing the armies performance in the beginning of an edition, especially if they get updated further in. Your comparison would have merit, if the Eldar was skipped for an update.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 14:44:54
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Kirasu wrote:Yes, GW decided to shelf one of the most popular armies (next to UM probably).. Someone has to be last on the list of codex updates and unfortunately BA made that list.
There is a 0% chance of BA ever being shelved.
The last blood angel release saw record breaking sales, they sold 6 months worth of product in 3 months. So I highly doubt they are being shelved. Especially with space hulk just released again.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/10/07 14:45:14
Rick Priestley said it best:
Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! The modern studio isn’t a studio in the same way; it isn’t a collection of artists and creatives sharing ideas and driving each other on. It’s become the promotions department of a toy company – things move on!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 14:50:22
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Grim Rune Priest in the Eye of the Storm
|
Ravenous D wrote: Kirasu wrote:Yes, GW decided to shelf one of the most popular armies (next to UM probably).. Someone has to be last on the list of codex updates and unfortunately BA made that list.
There is a 0% chance of BA ever being shelved.
The last blood angel release saw record breaking sales, they sold 6 months worth of product in 3 months. So I highly doubt they are being shelved. Especially with space hulk just released again.
I wish they would release just the models from Space Hulk, but they just don't want our money that much.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 14:56:42
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Steadfast Grey Hunter
|
such doom and gloom. I see January at the latest with the current release schedule. BA are one of my armies, and I have been waiting as well. But just because necrons *might* go before us, doesn't mean they are shelving BA.
Hang in there just a few more months, then after january and they aren't released, then you can be worried.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 15:01:31
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Anpu42 wrote: Ravenous D wrote: Kirasu wrote:Yes, GW decided to shelf one of the most popular armies (next to UM probably).. Someone has to be last on the list of codex updates and unfortunately BA made that list.
There is a 0% chance of BA ever being shelved.
The last blood angel release saw record breaking sales, they sold 6 months worth of product in 3 months. So I highly doubt they are being shelved. Especially with space hulk just released again.
I wish they would release just the models from Space Hulk, but they just don't want our money that much.
See space hulk is a sore point for me, it means that they have the technology to make really dynamic sculpts and put them on frames like that for less then the cost of what they are charging now, 10 terminators, 1 terminator libby is $150 (the same price of the game) in addition to that you get 22 genestealers, a broodlord and the rest of the game! Personally I think they should remake battle forces into these bundle deals with unique models. It acts as a booster box for people starting.
|
Rick Priestley said it best:
Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! The modern studio isn’t a studio in the same way; it isn’t a collection of artists and creatives sharing ideas and driving each other on. It’s become the promotions department of a toy company – things move on!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 15:07:08
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Grim Rune Priest in the Eye of the Storm
|
Ravenous D wrote: Anpu42 wrote: Ravenous D wrote: Kirasu wrote:Yes, GW decided to shelf one of the most popular armies (next to UM probably).. Someone has to be last on the list of codex updates and unfortunately BA made that list.
There is a 0% chance of BA ever being shelved.
The last blood angel release saw record breaking sales, they sold 6 months worth of product in 3 months. So I highly doubt they are being shelved. Especially with space hulk just released again.
I wish they would release just the models from Space Hulk, but they just don't want our money that much.
See space hulk is a sore point for me, it means that they have the technology to make really dynamic sculpts and put them on frames like that for less then the cost of what they are charging now, 10 terminators, 1 terminator libby is $150 (the same price of the game) in addition to that you get 22 genestealers, a broodlord and the rest of the game! Personally I think they should remake battle forces into these bundle deals with unique models. It acts as a booster box for people starting.
Or at least something like Dark Vengeance.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/07 16:09:19
Subject: Has GW shelved the Blood Angels?
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
|
JuniorRS13 wrote:
Hang in there just a few more months, then after january and they aren't released, then you can be worried.
Not a eeasonable request at this juncture I'm afraid. We have been utter sh*t for well over 2 years. We've been most in need of an updated book yet literally every other army has been given priority. A few even twice. And after all the waiting time, we are going to get the "streamlining treatment" where we get the points adjustments we desperately need, but we lose most of what makes us want to play BA. Look what GW did to GK SW and DE.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/10/07 16:14:28
|
|
 |
 |
|