Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/12/31 07:30:21
Subject: rules clarification horus heresy and 40k
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
Canada
|
im curious as to the associations one can make with horus heresy and 40k detachments and datasheets. im specifically asking about the expeditionary navigator. his datasheet covers only horus heresy factions but none of the 40k armies. i find it weird that there are horus heresy formations already considering many legions simply dont have rules at all or if they do they arent fleshed out. so i guess im asking can he be used in normal 40k armies? and if so which ones.
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Downloads/Product/PDF/N/Navigator.pdf
|
DA army: 3500pts,
admech army: 600pts
ravenguard: 565 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/12/31 07:31:42
Subject: Re:rules clarification horus heresy and 40k
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
I'd imagine he's Forces of the Imperium on the 40k matrix
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/12/31 07:32:33
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/12/31 07:32:00
Subject: rules clarification horus heresy and 40k
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
ionusx wrote:so i guess im asking can he be used in normal 40k armies? and if so which ones.
Does it say anything about normal 40k armies? No. Therefore you can't use him in a 40k army.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/12/31 07:34:25
Subject: rules clarification horus heresy and 40k
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
RAW he can be taken as an HQ choice in "any Primary Detachment." Common sense says he's a Heresy unit, I'd ask your opponent before trying to run him in a normal game. Especially if you're going to use "any Primary Detachment" to give Tau, Necrons, or Tyranids their very own Navigator.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/12/31 07:39:12
Subject: rules clarification horus heresy and 40k
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
So does RAW, unless you can cite some rules for using Agents of the Emperor/Warmaster in 40k armies.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/12/31 07:42:38
Subject: rules clarification horus heresy and 40k
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
Also it's not that weird that he has a data sheet 'considering many legions don't have rules at all', he's just a one off event exclusive model, I think a data sheet like that is a perfectly acceptable way to present his rules. Data sheets are only ridiculous in 40k because of the bloody amount of them, and that you have to pay for them.
|
|
 |
 |
|