Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 14:58:23
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Tau Pathfinders are one of the few box sets I can think of where every single weapon option is provided to meet the codex entry i.e. 3 ion rifles and 3 rail rifles. It's my favourite kit ever.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:03:09
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
Home Base: Prosper, TX (Dallas)
|
Super Newb wrote: Hulksmash wrote:Someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed. Apologists and Strawmen abound!
My bed has no sides. It's a circle.
No one is going to be happy no matter how you do it.
Silly, lazy, absolutely irrelevant "point" that people seem to think they are making again and again. There is not only happy and unhappy. There is a range of levels of happiness and unhappiness. People would be happier if more specials were included. Obviously.
Overall it's an excellent kit at lower cost than GW has released for similar in a while. And it's for an army people have been clamoring for for at least 15 years.
Yes! Overall they did good. But they can still be criticized for what they DIDN'T do good here. This isn't rocket science.
What if I told you I'm happier with more heads? Why? Because I only plan on using one special weapon type in my armies anyway doing 5-man squads for pods so the odds of them putting in enough specials (4 per box) of my choice were non-existant. However heads will help me seperate out my smaller squads which I'm much in favor of while I find suitable weapons either through bits or 3rd parties. Don't act like you version is the only version and people are only more happy with what you want. It's inaccurate, silly, lazy, and absolutely irrelevant
Regarding what they did well and didn't do well you're now down to opinion which isn't rocket science. They did something YOU don't think is good. Not something that everyone doesn't think is good.
Like I said, breathe and don't take it as personally as you seem to.
|
Best Painted (2015 Adepticon 40k Champs)
They Shall Know Fear - Adepticon 40k TT Champion (2012 & 2013) & 40k TT Best Sport (2014), 40k TT Best Tactician (2015 & 2016) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:05:19
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Not to beat a dead horse but I just looked at high res pics of the skitarii sprue. I can say with 100% certainty that removing 3 of the heads provides ample room for one additional arc rifle as well as one additional plasma caliver. (There is some empty space on some of the sprues which helps with this).
Anywhoo, I'll think of proper weapons substitutes / conversions because I am not going to spend half the cost of the kit just to equip the squad properly lol. Automatically Appended Next Post:
Less special weapons and more heads? I'd say it is extremely unlikely that your position is representative of the entire gaming population. Extremely extremely unlikely.
Regarding what they did well and didn't do well you're now down to opinion which isn't rocket science. They did something YOU don't think is good. Not something that everyone doesn't think is good.
See above.
Like I said, breathe and don't take it as personally as you seem to.
Useless, somewhat insulting comment you felt the need to make twice. You are implying I am ANGRY and/or overly EMOTIONAL. Like I need to CALM DOWN before I get a stroke or something! Or that GW did this to stick it to me PERSONALLY! Cute, but quite rude. Yeah yeah, you said it in a vaguer nicer way but that's still your point. I think we can do without such nonsense like that don't you think? Apology accepted in advance.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/06 15:11:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:26:17
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Super Newb wrote:Not to beat a dead horse but I just looked at high res pics of the skitarii sprue. I can say with 100% certainty that removing 3 of the heads provides ample room for one additional arc rifle as well as one additional plasma caliver. (There is some empty space on some of the sprues which helps with this).
Actually it doesn't. Because each of those weapons also has a specific backpack and additional components.
Arc Rifle uses components 88 through 91 and the Plasma Caliver uses components 92 through 96.
Removing "three of the heads" might open up space for just the gun itself--if that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:28:39
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
Super Newb wrote: Leth wrote:Super Newb wrote:Again, there are 26 freaking heads in the box. GW is just dumb. Or mean. It has to be one or the other. They prioritized heads over guns.
Forget buying FW guns as a stand in. I'll probably buy third party or make my own because I am not giving Gee Dubs any more money to fix their silliniess.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
OrlandotheTechnicoloured wrote:the problem is they give a unit too many options,
if they can use 3 special weapons, and there are 3 types GW would have to put 9 in the box to satisfy everybody (instead of the current 3 and that's unlikely to happen),
 Forget everyone. This isn't an all or nothing thing. Almost nothing is. If they had two of each weapon that would satisfy a hell of a lot more people. Having only ( lol only) 20 heads would allow room for another arc rifle and plasma caliver. That's an easy thing they could have done well still letting Rangers and Vanguard have different heads.
Considering there are 2 builds from the kit, each using 10 of the heads there is only really 13 heads per 10 guys. Not that over the top in that case.
Uh... so, you agree they prioritized heads over guns?
You agree knocking the number of heads down to 20 would've allowed room for two more special weapons?
Or are you trying your darndest to absolve GW of their sins? Let me know now if you actually want to discuss this rationally or if you are playing the part of an apologist. If it's the latter no sense discussing this.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
MasterSlowPoke wrote:It's not like the heads are taking up the whole sprue. The Arquebus is probably longer than the extra 6 heads.
 Who said they were taking up the whole sprue? You win the strawman award.
Are you really arguing that they should have made 2 different sets of sprues, one with the Vanguard and the other with the Rangers just to add in an extra gun or two?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:28:58
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
To supernewb
Are you sure you can fit weapons instead of heads, you must have made the calculation for the molds and Thermodynamics and tooling as well. You seem so sure of it.
Such emotion...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/06 15:30:16
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:29:38
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
SirDonlad wrote:I just want to point out something that passed me by; these skittarii ranger squads are cheap!
You get a box of TEN models costing £23 - this actually seems like a good deal, very close to £2 a model; i've paid that for anvil industries stuff and i'm really pleased with what i bought from them.
$3.90 for the less squiggle-inclined*
Beautiful models, and the Codex is reasonably priced, but the Sicaran, Ironstrider, and Onager pricing is borderline WTF.
|
Peregrine - If you like the army buy it, and don't worry about what one random person on the internet thinks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:30:26
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
On the Internet
|
It has an inside and an outside. Checkmate atheists.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:35:20
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis
Home Base: Prosper, TX (Dallas)
|
Super Newb wrote: Like I said, breathe and don't take it as personally as you seem to. No less rude than you calling people apologists or strawmen when they present a different point of view. Useless, somewhat insulting comment you felt the need to make twice. You are implying I am ANGRY and/or overly EMOTIONAL. Like I need to CALM DOWN before I get a stroke or something! Or that GW did this to stick it to me PERSONALLY! Cute, but quite rude. Yeah yeah, you said it in a vaguer nicer way but that's still your point. I think we can do without such nonsense like that don't you think? Apology accepted in advance. No less rude than you calling people apologists or strawmen when they present a different point of view. Apologies are for when one might have done something wrong. I merely suggested you not take it so personally. Which, based on your method of reply, you did and do. You feel like I have slighted you or been rude feel free to hit the triangle and the mods can take it up with me Basically you haven't considered any of the other items needed to create those additional weapons and yet you insist it's possible. It amazes what people will get upset about.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/06 15:36:32
Best Painted (2015 Adepticon 40k Champs)
They Shall Know Fear - Adepticon 40k TT Champion (2012 & 2013) & 40k TT Best Sport (2014), 40k TT Best Tactician (2015 & 2016) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:40:24
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Kanluwen wrote:Super Newb wrote:Not to beat a dead horse but I just looked at high res pics of the skitarii sprue. I can say with 100% certainty that removing 3 of the heads provides ample room for one additional arc rifle as well as one additional plasma caliver. (There is some empty space on some of the sprues which helps with this).
Actually it doesn't. Because each of those weapons also has a specific backpack and additional components.
Arc Rifle uses components 88 through 91 and the Plasma Caliver uses components 92 through 96.
Removing "three of the heads" might open up space for just the gun itself--if that.
All the additional components besides the backpack, yes sir it does. But I am sure Gee dubs if they wanted to add more special weapons would've found the backpacks to be an insurmountable problem. Oh wait, no they wouldn't have. Lol.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
pizzaguardian wrote:To supernewb
Are you sure you can fit weapons instead of heads, you must have made the calculation for the molds and Thermodynamics and tooling as well. You seem so sure of it.
I see how much room the heads take. I see there are spots the heads can go on the sprue where there is room for them. Also I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night so I am an expert on Thermodynamics.
Such emotion...
Yes, throw in this nonsense because that helps. "You wrong because your opinion is strong! If you were a woman you'd be hysterical!"
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Hulksmash wrote:Super Newb wrote:
Like I said, breathe and don't take it as personally as you seem to.
Useless, somewhat insulting comment you felt the need to make twice. You are implying I am ANGRY and/or overly EMOTIONAL. Like I need to CALM DOWN before I get a stroke or something! Or that GW did this to stick it to me PERSONALLY! Cute, but quite rude. Yeah yeah, you said it in a vaguer nicer way but that's still your point. I think we can do without such nonsense like that don't you think? Apology accepted in advance.
No less rude than
SO YOU ADMIT YOU WERE BEING RUDE. THANK YOU.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/04/06 15:56:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:44:48
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Deadly Dire Avenger
Butte, MT
|
Verviedi wrote: SirDonlad wrote:I just want to point out something that passed me by; these skittarii ranger squads are cheap!
You get a box of TEN models costing £23 - this actually seems like a good deal, very close to £2 a model; i've paid that for anvil industries stuff and i'm really pleased with what i bought from them.
$3.90 for the less squiggle-inclined*
Beautiful models, and the Codex is reasonably priced, but the Sicaran, Ironstrider, and Onager pricing is borderline WTF.
Do we know the Onager pricing yet?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:47:24
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
ronin_cse wrote: Verviedi wrote: SirDonlad wrote:I just want to point out something that passed me by; these skittarii ranger squads are cheap!
You get a box of TEN models costing £23 - this actually seems like a good deal, very close to £2 a model; i've paid that for anvil industries stuff and i'm really pleased with what i bought from them.
$3.90 for the less squiggle-inclined*
Beautiful models, and the Codex is reasonably priced, but the Sicaran, Ironstrider, and Onager pricing is borderline WTF.
Do we know the Onager pricing yet?
IIRC $65.
I can't remember exactly where I read it. Take it with salt.
|
Peregrine - If you like the army buy it, and don't worry about what one random person on the internet thinks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:54:39
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Dammit! I've been bested lol.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 15:56:38
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I'd have liked to see more weapon options. I'll look around at 3rd party bits and/or some FW guns and make it work, were I to start a small AdMech detachment.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 16:34:47
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
hm, I'll wait to see the codex but if they do not include Graviton Guns and Grav Guns what's the point?
|
"Those that Dare impersonate the dead are judged to join their ranks!"- Alucard
6970 points of Preheresy Night Lords 7681 points Preheresy thousand sons 8230 points Preheresy Iron Warriors 3230 points Preheresy Death Guard 4940 points preheresy Dark Angels 4888 points preheresy Iron Hands 2030 points preheresy Blood Angels 2280 points preheresy space wolfs 1065 points preheresy white scars 3210 points preheresy sons of Horus 1660 points Grey Knights 628 points Sister of Battle 2960 points adeptus mechanicus 18650 points Titanicus legio Nex Caput capitis 5566 points Imperial Guard 5875 points Preheresy Emperor's Children 3735 points Preheresy World Eaters 1710 points Preheresy Word Bearers 2090 points preheresy Imperial Fists 1570 points preheresy Alpha Legion 4600 points necrons 1420 points prehersy Raven Guard 960 points prehersy Salamanders 6334 points Tau Empire 20942 points tyranids 8722 points eldar 3125 points dark eldar 10745 points Bearers of the Light 1415 points Preheresy Luna Wolves 8508 points Chaos
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 16:37:17
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
TyraelVladinhurst wrote:hm, I'll wait to see the codex but if they do not include Graviton Guns and Grav Guns what's the point?
Why would they?
As of right now, only Blood Angels and Codex: Space Marines have grav weaponry.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 16:37:34
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
TyraelVladinhurst wrote:hm, I'll wait to see the codex but if they do not include Graviton Guns and Grav Guns what's the point?
The fluff in the codex states they sold all of their Grav Guns to the Space Marines. And then their Grav Gun Factory blew up. With the one guy who knew how to build them inside. RIP Grav Guns.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 16:44:41
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Do we have a battleforce discounted box set yet?
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 16:48:40
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
It does not look like it.
Which is a shame, since Skitarii and Harlequin both would have benefited from such a box.
Even if it was only something like one of the most basic Formations packed into a box with a discount.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:09:57
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Enginseer with a Wrench
|
yeah but why would GW produce a box when they know everyone will buy them a la carte. loss leaders and low cost of entry products just dont seem to be what GW is interested in, as much as I would like it to be otherwise.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:17:46
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Dramagod2 wrote:yeah but why would GW produce a box when they know everyone will buy them a la carte. loss leaders and low cost of entry products just dont seem to be what GW is interested in, as much as I would like it to be otherwise.
At least the troops are a decent price. $32 US for ten guys is pretty good nowadays.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:24:51
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
I would expect a battleforce in the the late summer.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:31:14
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Do you have any kind of information for this, or just throwing it out there?
Because generally if there has been an army box, it comes out a week or two after the releases finish.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:34:51
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
|
It's pretty rare for new kits to be in a boxed set so early. Most army boxed-sets tend to push stocks of older models alongside the new stuff. Brand-new stuff typically sells itself simply by being new, GW don't need to cut the price immediately.
My money says we'll see Harlequin and AdMech boxes around Xmas alongside new formation downloads, in much the same way as the Eldar Ghost Warriors box pushed the new Wraith model stock from earlier in that year.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/06 17:35:49
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:35:56
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Leaping Khawarij
|
Kanluwen wrote:
Do you have any kind of information for this, or just throwing it out there?
Because generally if there has been an army box, it comes out a week or two after the releases finish.
Im guessing its possible with the campaign book this kind of battleforce would fill a week so i guess it could make sense that they would dump it in one of the emptier months.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:44:51
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
Dramagod2 wrote:yeah but why would GW produce a box when they know everyone will buy them a la carte. loss leaders and low cost of entry products just dont seem to be what GW is interested in, as much as I would like it to be otherwise.
Most releases have had a discounted battleforce type box.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:46:00
Subject: Re:Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I am not sure if this is Adeptus Mechanicus news. Next week Gw is releasing a new terrain kit is called The Plasma Obliterator.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/06 17:46:26
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:46:37
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Leaping Khawarij
|
ImAGeek wrote: Dramagod2 wrote:yeah but why would GW produce a box when they know everyone will buy them a la carte. loss leaders and low cost of entry products just dont seem to be what GW is interested in, as much as I would like it to be otherwise.
Most releases have had a discounted battleforce type box.
Not usually sub codex ones.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:46:58
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Deadly Dire Avenger
Butte, MT
|
Dramagod2 wrote:yeah but why would GW produce a box when they know everyone will buy them a la carte. loss leaders and low cost of entry products just dont seem to be what GW is interested in, as much as I would like it to be otherwise.
I dunno about that. Take the Grey Knight box for instance: for $240 +$20 for a character you can pretty easily make a 1500 pt army. Actually a really good entry into the hobby.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/04/06 17:49:52
Subject: Adeptus Mechanicus for 40k p92/93 updated release and stats
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
migooo wrote: ImAGeek wrote: Dramagod2 wrote:yeah but why would GW produce a box when they know everyone will buy them a la carte. loss leaders and low cost of entry products just dont seem to be what GW is interested in, as much as I would like it to be otherwise.
Most releases have had a discounted battleforce type box.
Not usually sub codex ones.
I'm pretty sure Tempestus Scions got one with TS, Tauroxes and Valkyries.
Edit: yep, found it.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/04/06 17:50:42
|
|
 |
 |
|