Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2000/12/05 07:23:02
Subject: Warhammer 40k Video Bat Rep #267 Blood Angels vs Grey Knights
Cool video. Always like your battle reports. While we're on old school lists, i would love to see your take on the old school jumper/DoA style army. Its always been my favorite strategy, even if its questionably competitive at best.
5,000
:cficon: 1,500
2015/01/08 20:45:03
Subject: Warhammer 40k Video Bat Rep #267 Blood Angels vs Grey Knights
1. At the end of the game, wouldn't the tact squad on Dogger's objective claim it because the BA list is bound?
2. Toward the end you guys talk about how good the HF is now for BA. How did you come up with the distance that you were talking about? 18/20 Inch threat range?
3. What is opsec?
4. Could Dogger say "uhm" a few more times? lol
YOUR SUFFERING WILL BE LEGENDARY, EVEN IN HELL
2015/01/09 07:41:08
Subject: Warhammer 40k Video Bat Rep #267 Blood Angels vs Grey Knights
Gundor2 wrote: Great report as always. I have a few questions.
1. At the end of the game, wouldn't the tact squad on Dogger's objective claim it because the BA list is bound?
2. Toward the end you guys talk about how good the HF is now for BA. How did you come up with the distance that you were talking about? 18/20 Inch threat range?
3. What is opsec?
4. Could Dogger say "uhm" a few more times? lol
1. Being bound does not automaticly grant Objective Secured, you would have t be Bound running a Combined Arms Detachment as your primary to get Objective Secured, hence the tactical squad wouldnt claim it over DOgger's units.
3000
4000
2015/01/14 20:13:57
Subject: Warhammer 40k Video Bat Rep #267 Blood Angels vs Grey Knights
Eldercaveman wrote: Doesn't the character with the higher Ld need to be your Warlord?
Not anymore. That was a 6E requirement. In 7E, the only requirement is that your Warlord needs to be a character....assuming there are any characters in the army.
Eldercaveman wrote: Doesn't the character with the higher Ld need to be your Warlord?
Not anymore. That was a 6E requirement. In 7E, the only requirement is that your Warlord needs to be a character....assuming there are any characters in the army.
I've been playing too much Fantasy recently. Stuff gets muddled. Cheers Jy2