Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 08:07:38
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
So I just got the codex. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but can the D-Lord now the take the phase shifter and/or the 2+ armor upgrade? Cause if so, DAMN...
|
GW: "We do no demographic research, we have no focus groups, we do not ask the market what it wants" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 08:11:53
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Ferrum_Sanguinis wrote:So I just got the codex. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but can the D-Lord now the take the phase shifter and/or the 2+ armor upgrade? Cause if so, DAMN...
A phase shifter? Yes he always can.
But the 2+ armor upgrade is only available once as an arcane item.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 08:13:02
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
NY
|
wuestenfux wrote: Sasori wrote: NecronLord3 wrote:So what's the thought on the D. Lord attached to wraiths. It pretty much makes him a 6" moving infantry model. Not sure if wraiths are going to work without the d. Lord attached?
Why wouldn't they work without the Dlord?
PE is nice, but it's not the end all be all. The T5 on them means that the Dlord being used as a meatsheild isn't near as valuable, and with the loss of MSS the Dlord isn't near what he used to be in challenges.
Wraiths got a lot better, and the Dlord got a lot worse. I don't think he is needed at all anymore.
What HQ would you prefer in the new edition?
I want a fast HQ who can work on his own.
So I see only the Barge Lord or the DLord here.
I think it's still the bargelord. You just have to be more careful with him and what you aim him at. I like zhandrekh too but I have no idea where i'd put him since he cant go with warriors in an ark. If I took a blob than maybe
|
Where is your saviour now?
"War is an act of force, and there are no limitations to the application of that force" - Clausewitz |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 08:14:50
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
wuestenfux wrote: Ferrum_Sanguinis wrote:So I just got the codex. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but can the D-Lord now the take the phase shifter and/or the 2+ armor upgrade? Cause if so, DAMN...
A phase shifter? Yes he always can.
But the 2+ armor upgrade is only available once as an arcane item.
Still, a T6 model with a 2+ and 4++? And armed with a warscythe? I2 or not, he is gonna put the hurt on most anything in the game...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 08:16:50
GW: "We do no demographic research, we have no focus groups, we do not ask the market what it wants" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 09:46:35
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
Ferrum_Sanguinis wrote: wuestenfux wrote: Ferrum_Sanguinis wrote:So I just got the codex. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but can the D-Lord now the take the phase shifter and/or the 2+ armor upgrade? Cause if so, DAMN...
A phase shifter? Yes he always can.
But the 2+ armor upgrade is only available once as an arcane item.
Still, a T6 model with a 2+ and 4++? And armed with a warscythe? I2 or not, he is gonna put the hurt on most anything in the game...
Run it out of the Mephrit dynasty with Solar Thermasite, or with Orikan, and that becomes a re-rollable 2+.
2+ re-roll/4++ re-roll 1s/4+++ re-roll 1s/5++++ IWND for good measure.
|
Death Korps of Krieg Siege Army 1500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 09:48:51
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Here's a list
NewCrons (1843pts)
Necrons: Codex (2015) (Decurion Detachment)
Core
Reclamation Legion
Catacomb Command Barge, Gauss Cannon, Gauntlet of Fire, Phase Shifter, Phylactery, Warscythe
5x Immortal
3x Tomb Blade Nebuloscope, Particle Beamer, Shadowloom, Shield Vanes
10x Necron Warrior in Ghost Ark
10x Necron Warrior
Auxiliary
Canoptek Harvest
3x Canoptek Scarab
1x Canoptek Spyder
6x Canoptek Wraiths + Whip Coils
Mephrit Dynasty Cohort
Destroyer Lord Edge of Eternity, Phase Shifter, Phylactery, Solar Thermasite, The Nightmare Shroud
5x Immortal Night Scythe
5x Immortal Night Scythe
5x Immortal
So in this list the D Lord is about as crazy awesome as is possible. Send him and the wraiths at the opponents big nasty. The bargeLord can hit vehicles and beasties it can handle.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 09:56:03
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Crafty Clanrat
Germany
|
You can't have Nebuloscopes and Shadowlooms. It's either one or the other.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 09:59:01
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
That is true, for some reason it's either +1 Cover or Ignores Cover.
Which weapon would everyone advice on a Tomb Blade nowadays?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 09:59:41
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Aldaris wrote:You can't have Nebuloscopes and Shadowlooms. It's either one or the other.
Fair enough. I was using BattleScribe which allowed it. Is this an issue Kangodo? Automatically Appended Next Post: Kangodo wrote:That is true, for some reason it's either +1 Cover or Ignores Cover.
Which weapon would everyone advice on a Tomb Blade nowadays?
Ignores cover is sick and particle beamer seems best.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 10:00:34
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 10:05:14
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
Yeah, I fixed it on Battlescribe.
Got some errors fixed and I will wait the entire day until I release a new version.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 10:12:43
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Kangodo wrote:Yeah, I fixed it on Battlescribe.
Got some errors fixed and I will wait the entire day until I release a new version.
Thanks by the way for doing all that Battlescribe stuff in such an insanely timely manner! Cheers.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 11:55:23
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Kangodo wrote:Which weapon would everyone advice on a Tomb Blade nowadays?
With Ignores Cover:
Gauss if you're against Xenos with decent armour or skimmers.
Particle Beamers against guard, Orks and Tyranid Hordes.
Without Ignores Cover:
Gauss if you want to kill vehicles. Particle Beamers if you want to generate lots of wounds.
When to take Tesla: Last codex if you expected to jink a lot. Never now.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 12:15:23
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
ShadarLogoth wrote:In the context of Void Blade / Particle caster TPs, that Triarch formation is still pretty legit, the more I think about it. Obviously effecting all units would have been sweet, but both Rending and Entropic are meaning full rules in conjunction with rerolls.
Obviously not nearly as good as it would have been otherwise, but if you are considering both units, that's a pretty good way to bring them. Marking a target for TP death per turn doesn't take away what the Stalker is doing other wise, both in shooting and buffing with the 6 range. And adding reroll to hit and wound/armor pan to either Praetorian is still pretty legit. In fact, if you had one of each it would be a pretty good way of covering both bases. Giving you a sold medium / heavy infantry counter and a solid heavy vehicle / light infantry counter, depending on which you needed more each turn.
5 VB/ PC on the charge against a marked vehicle give you, what, 5.4 HPs? That's not too shabby lol.
The re-roll bonus only works during the shooting phase. No melee rerolls as the effect goes away when the phase ends.
|
8000 points of XI Legion the Space Vagabonds, they can adapt their tactics to represent any and every Legion and Chapter as needed because they were created by the Emperor to be the ultimate tactical power. They have faked their disappearance in order to infiltrate every part of the conflicts in the galaxy.
8000 points of Tau/Craftworld Eldar/Necron because the Space Vagabonds can also emulate their wargear and tactics.
Victories: ALL
Losses: NONE (My armies have the psychic ability to conjure a cataclysmic storm whenever they are about to lose. This allows the Space Vagabonds to teleport away while releasing power waves that destroys the battlefield and so every battle is a victory)
Sabet wrote:PS: Vhalyar, that signature makes you look like a band wagoner and a very bad loser |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 13:02:13
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I'm not sure if this has already been covered, but what kind of anti air do we have now aside from flyers?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 13:10:32
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
Do you count LoW-slots?
Otherwise we have Sentry Pylons, I am surely bringing them.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 13:45:52
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
So. Can we now take the Conclave with the Tranny C'Tanny? His description sounds like he is now a Shard. And te picture in Baal uses him as a reference.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 13:55:18
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
I guess not. We have two C'tan Shard of XYZ and a Transcendent C'tan. So a line that allows us to take a C'tan Shard will surely be meant for the first two. I also see no reason to use the Transcendent, because he is clearly inferior to the other two.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 13:55:32
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 14:26:17
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Isn't it weird, then, that they used the Image of the Tranny in the formation description? And I agree. The Nightbringer is better unless you want to punch Knights. As that extra Str point matters then. Also aesthetically, I'd love to find a way to use Trans in my army. It's purty.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 14:33:07
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Kholzerino wrote:Isn't it weird, then, that they used the Image of the Tranny in the formation description? And I agree. The Nightbringer is better unless you want to punch Knights. As that extra Str point matters then. Also aesthetically, I'd love to find a way to use Trans in my army. It's purty.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 14:35:41
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Kangodo wrote:Do you count LoW-slots?
Otherwise we have Sentry Pylons, I am surely bringing them.
I'm looking for something relatively reliable against something like dakkajets and stormravens in >= 1000 point games.
Someone mentioned tomb blades as an anti-air option, but I can't figure out why that would be viable.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 14:37:23
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
AbyssalisCuriositas wrote:I'm not sure if this has already been covered, but what kind of anti air do we have now aside from flyers?
In the codex. No.
Sentry Pylons and the Gauss Pylon from Forgeworld can provide additional AA.
Edit: Bah missed Kangodo's post.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 14:38:28
My win rate while having my arms and legs tied behind by back while blindfolded and stuffed in a safe that is submerged underwater:
100% |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 14:46:20
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Oberron wrote:
Dlord in Flayed one deepstrike with the Solar staff is a bad day for the enemy as long as you don't mess up the scatter. The can't assault restriction the the deep strike won't matter as much if everything becomes snapshot at the flayed one unit. Is anything else a must take for this unit? I think a res orb would be better suited than the phase shifter but both can be nice and have their place but neither are must haves for this.
Or would it be better/cheaper to just stick a cryptek in there with the veil of darkness and a chronometron for the 5++ to everything? 115pts for the tek and 125-150 for the Dlord. Risk the shooting phase for the 5++/4+++rp or be safe with snap shots(and immune to blast) and have PE. Hmm it looks like the Dlord is the better case
I was looking at this as well. Dlord with Solar Staff with 20 FOs.
Or, give a cryptek the solar staff/VoD and the cryptek adds +1 to RP.
You could always just through them both in there for a +1 RP tax and give the staff to the beat stick Dlord.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 14:52:37
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
AbyssalisCuriositas wrote:I'm looking for something relatively reliable against something like dakkajets and stormravens in >= 1000 point games. Someone mentioned tomb blades as an anti-air option, but I can't figure out why that would be viable.
Because they are cheap, fast and are something you would like anyway. They might put out a few less HP's than others, but they make up for that with their Ignore Cover-ability which ignores Jink. Byte wrote:I was looking at this as well. Dlord with Solar Staff with 20 FOs. Or, give a cryptek the solar staff/VoD and the cryptek adds +1 to RP. You could always just through them both in there for a +1 RP tax and give the staff to the beat stick Dlord.
Only one Relic per model, so that would not work. If you take a Decurion you get the +1RP for free.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 14:54:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:00:33
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Kangodo wrote:AbyssalisCuriositas wrote:I'm looking for something relatively reliable against something like dakkajets and stormravens in >= 1000 point games.
Someone mentioned tomb blades as an anti-air option, but I can't figure out why that would be viable.
Because they are cheap, fast and are something you would like anyway.
They might put out a few less HP's than others, but they make up for that with their Ignore Cover-ability which ignores Jink.
Byte wrote:I was looking at this as well. Dlord with Solar Staff with 20 FOs.
Or, give a cryptek the solar staff/VoD and the cryptek adds +1 to RP.
You could always just through them both in there for a +1 RP tax and give the staff to the beat stick Dlord.
Only one Relic per model, so that would not work.
If you take a Decurion you get the +1RP for free.
I don't get the attraction for antiair either. Still hit on 6s, yes? Ignore cover with STR 5 vs most flyers big deal(think storm raven as mentioned). Rely on gauss? Two 6s in a row to glance. Don't get it.
Gotcha.
I wouldn't say Decurion is free. Takes away too many options for me with the compulsory units. YMMV
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/02/01 15:09:31
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:29:02
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Squishy Oil Squig
Mount Cotton, Redlands (BRISBANE)
|
With the +1 bonus to Reanimation Protocols rolls from the Decurion Detachment + the re-rolls of 1's for
the Overlord his unit and units from this Formation that are within 12" of him from the Reclamation Legion.
Would mass infantry be a viable option with this codex?
4+, 4+ re-rolling 1's with added Barges has to be pretty good right?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:32:42
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It was me who noticed how good Tomb Blades are for anti-air, and it was for this reason: Ignores Cover transfers when manning an Aegis Defence Line's quad gun.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:40:50
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
dubhgilla wrote:With the +1 bonus to Reanimation Protocols rolls from the Decurion Detachment + the re-rolls of 1's for
the Overlord his unit and units from this Formation that are within 12" of him from the Reclamation Legion.
Would mass infantry be a viable option with this codex?
4+, 4+ re-rolling 1's with added Barges has to be pretty good right?
I think so, I mean you'd have some tactical holes but so what. Big bricks of metal undead! What's not to like?
changemod wrote:It was me who noticed how good Tomb Blades are for anti-air, and it was for this reason: Ignores Cover transfers when manning an Aegis Defence Line's quad gun.
That's the element that's getting left out of all the posts, Aegis gun. Got it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:42:27
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
changemod wrote:It was me who noticed how good Tomb Blades are for anti-air, and it was for this reason: Ignores Cover transfers when manning an Aegis Defence Line's quad gun.
Exactly. I want to take another look at the Pylons though because we truly do lack AA if we don't want to take a decent amount of Night Scythes. What I wonder is, is the Quad Gun penalized if the Tomb Blades jink and then they to man it? I feel like it should be but I'm not sure.
I don't own IA 12, so I'll have to borrow it from a friend of mine, but someone please correct me if I'm wrong here:
Pylons can't be taken as part of the Decurion, right? So you would have to take an allied force of regular Necrons to take pylons? Or are they a formation?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 15:43:15
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:56:25
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
luke1705 wrote:changemod wrote:It was me who noticed how good Tomb Blades are for anti-air, and it was for this reason: Ignores Cover transfers when manning an Aegis Defence Line's quad gun.
Exactly. I want to take another look at the Pylons though because we truly do lack AA if we don't want to take a decent amount of Night Scythes. What I wonder is, is the Quad Gun penalized if the Tomb Blades jink and then they to man it? I feel like it should be but I'm not sure.
I don't own IA 12, so I'll have to borrow it from a friend of mine, but someone please correct me if I'm wrong here:
Pylons can't be taken as part of the Decurion, right? So you would have to take an allied force of regular Necrons to take pylons? Or are they a formation?
Strictly speaking you could have a Decurion in an Unbound force that's 90% Decurion.
Might raise some frowns of course,
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 15:57:39
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
So to bring canoptek harvest I absolutely have to bring a destroyer cult? I'm looking at the codex trying to make sense of it.
|
|
 |
 |
|