Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:02:55
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:08:01
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:11:27
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
For those working on the battlescribe files, first thank you.
I did note that BS file allows solar thermasite on a D lord however exterminatus states "necron overlord or cryptek only". Same with edge of eternity.
Also the file is allowing me to mix and match relics from exterminatus and the codex relics within a destroyer cult, which should not be possible (unless taking a mephrit dynasty detachment/formation.. perhaps).
If this has been corrected please disregard and again thanks.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2015/02/01 16:14:32
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:15:51
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Yes and no. They can be standalone formations, both for Necrons and other armies. If IG wants to have a Canoptek Harvest and no other Necron models in their army, they now can. A normal Necron CAD could also use a destroyer cult as their formstion source.
However, if you want to use the Decurion, you have to take a single reclamation legion. That then unlocks whatever else you want, in whatever quantity (except royal courts IIRC I think they are only one but who cares?). So my battle forged Decurion army could be:
1 reclamation legion
3 Canoptek harvests
1 judicator battalion
All of these would claim the benefits from their own formation as well as the command benefits of Decurion (not obsec sadly but hey, +1 RP is pretty dope)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:16:43
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
No, that is because the Codex doesn't give us a 'Formation' that has those units. Forgeworld would have to make Formations with a note saying that they can be taken as 'Auxiliary' in a Decurion Detachment. Though IA12 does give permission to be taken as an Allied Detachment to Necrons. But many of those units no longer work or work badly. +Kutlakh works if you ignore his Ever-living. -Toholk has an Aeonstave and Timesplinter Cloak, so no longer works. -Overlords and Lords work but are paying old prices for stuff that is now nerfed ( PS for 45, etc); you should also ignore the CCB upgrade. +They can take a CCB just like Necrons. +Warriors are roughly the same, but can take Flensing Scarabs and pay more for the Ghost Ark. -Flayed Ones are Troops, but lack the Shred and additional attack. -Immortals are fine, rules did not break them. ++They can still take a Night Scythe at 100 points  -Lychguard: You pay 20 additional points for Rage. No-go! +Acanthrites are fine. +Maynarkh Scarabs are awesome, they are the old ones with a changed ES. (Read this GW: Their point increase is stupid!) -Tesseract Ark is nerfed from AV14 to AV13, though he is Heavy so Living Metal does repair his hull points now. +Pylons are okay as always, we do need a change in their Skyfire. dominuschao wrote:For those working on the battlescribe files, first thank you. I did note that BS file allows solar thermasite on a D lord however exterminatus states "necron overlord or cryptek only". Same with edge of eternity. Also the file is allowing me to mix and match relics from exterminatus and the codex relics within a destroyer cult, which should not be possible (unless taking a mephrit dynasty detachment/formation.. perhaps). If this has been corrected please disregard and again thanks. http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/240/617215.page#7552654 But thank you! The D-Lord was a mistake, I copied the Overlord, changed some names and removed Ranged Weapons. I removed Thermasite and Edge of Eternity now. Edit: Did the same for a Lord. That last thing is your own fault! Mephrit Relics are hidden unless you tell the program your Formation/Detachment is from Exterminatus. It's the selection in the 'No Category'-group.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/02/01 16:23:52
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:29:06
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
luke1705 wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Yes and no. They can be standalone formations, both for Necrons and other armies. If IG wants to have a Canoptek Harvest and no other Necron models in their army, they now can. A normal Necron CAD could also use a destroyer cult as their formstion source.
However, if you want to use the Decurion, you have to take a single reclamation legion. That then unlocks whatever else you want, in whatever quantity (except royal courts IIRC I think they are only one but who cares?). So my battle forged Decurion army could be:
1 reclamation legion
3 Canoptek harvests
1 judicator battalion
All of these would claim the benefits from their own formation as well as the command benefits of Decurion (not obsec sadly but hey, +1 RP is pretty dope)
That doesn't sound right.
So I can make a normal necron army and take canoptek harvest, only thing I lose is the bonus to RP?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:37:33
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
That last thing is your own fault!
Mephrit Relics are hidden unless you tell the program your Formation/Detachment is from Exterminatus.
It's the selection in the 'No Category'-group.
Gotcha good to know.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/03 03:26:31
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
col_impact wrote:Here's a list
NewCrons (1843pts)
Necrons: Codex (2015) (Decurion Detachment)
Core
Reclamation Legion
Catacomb Command Barge, Gauss Cannon, Gauntlet of Fire, Phase Shifter, Phylactery, Warscythe
5x Immortal
3x Tomb Blade Nebuloscope, Particle Beamer, Shadowloom, Shield Vanes
10x Necron Warrior in Ghost Ark
10x Necron Warrior
Auxiliary
Canoptek Harvest
3x Canoptek Scarab
1x Canoptek Spyder
6x Canoptek Wraiths + Whip Coils
Mephrit Dynasty Cohort
Destroyer Lord Edge of Eternity, Phase Shifter, Phylactery, Solar Thermasite, The Nightmare Shroud
5x Immortal Night Scythe
5x Immortal Night Scythe
5x Immortal
So in this list the D Lord is about as crazy awesome as is possible. Send him and the wraiths at the opponents big nasty. The bargeLord can hit vehicles and beasties it can handle.
I don't know if it's already been mentioned, but the D-lord cannot take the Solar Thermasite. Only Overlords can take that.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:52:42
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Jaq Draco lives wrote:luke1705 wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Yes and no. They can be standalone formations, both for Necrons and other armies. If IG wants to have a Canoptek Harvest and no other Necron models in their army, they now can. A normal Necron CAD could also use a destroyer cult as their formstion source.
However, if you want to use the Decurion, you have to take a single reclamation legion. That then unlocks whatever else you want, in whatever quantity (except royal courts IIRC I think they are only one but who cares?). So my battle forged Decurion army could be:
1 reclamation legion
3 Canoptek harvests
1 judicator battalion
All of these would claim the benefits from their own formation as well as the command benefits of Decurion (not obsec sadly but hey, +1 RP is pretty dope)
That doesn't sound right.
So I can make a normal necron army and take canoptek harvest, only thing I lose is the bonus to RP?
The formations are just formations, you can take them as any other one would be. If they're categorized under the Decurion, though, you get the further benefits.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 16:55:06
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Requizen wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote:luke1705 wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Yes and no. They can be standalone formations, both for Necrons and other armies. If IG wants to have a Canoptek Harvest and no other Necron models in their army, they now can. A normal Necron CAD could also use a destroyer cult as their formstion source.
However, if you want to use the Decurion, you have to take a single reclamation legion. That then unlocks whatever else you want, in whatever quantity (except royal courts IIRC I think they are only one but who cares?). So my battle forged Decurion army could be:
1 reclamation legion
3 Canoptek harvests
1 judicator battalion
All of these would claim the benefits from their own formation as well as the command benefits of Decurion (not obsec sadly but hey, +1 RP is pretty dope)
That doesn't sound right.
So I can make a normal necron army and take canoptek harvest, only thing I lose is the bonus to RP?
The formations are just formations, you can take them as any other one would be. If they're categorized under the Decurion, though, you get the further benefits.
Good to know cheers.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 18:21:09
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Necron codex page 64 right column, last para.
What's the issue?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:01:55
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Byte wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Necron codex page 64 right column, last para.
What's the issue?
Im on electronic so I don't really get the page references I'm afraid. But I simply didn't understand how the formations work, the way the blocks look it seems like you would have to take a destroyer cult. Typically that kind of hierarchical display signifies, well, a hierarchy that must be followed in order to gain access to units.
Probably just me being silly, I understand now, you can take basically anything but following the decurion rules confers benefits, its all good.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:12:15
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
jy2 wrote:col_impact wrote:Here's a list
NewCrons (1843pts)
Necrons: Codex (2015) (Decurion Detachment)
Core
Reclamation Legion
Catacomb Command Barge, Gauss Cannon, Gauntlet of Fire, Phase Shifter, Phylactery, Warscythe
5x Immortal
3x Tomb Blade Nebuloscope, Particle Beamer, Shadowloom, Shield Vanes
10x Necron Warrior in Ghost Ark
10x Necron Warrior
Auxiliary
Canoptek Harvest
3x Canoptek Scarab
1x Canoptek Spyder
6x Canoptek Wraiths + Whip Coils
Mephrit Dynasty Cohort
Destroyer Lord Edge of Eternity, Phase Shifter, Phylactery, Solar Thermasite, The Nightmare Shroud
5x Immortal Night Scythe
5x Immortal Night Scythe
5x Immortal
So in this list the D Lord is about as crazy awesome as is possible. Send him and the wraiths at the opponents big nasty. The bargeLord can hit vehicles and beasties it can handle.
I don't know if it's already been mentioned, but the D-lord cannot take the Solar Thermasite. Only Overlords can take that.
Yea. Battlescribe was allowing it. I think Kangodo is going to address it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:16:42
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
Yes, yes, fixed it already.
Edge of Eternity is also not allowed.
And they are both not allowed on regular Lords
Perhaps we should send an angry letter to GW.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0044/02/01 19:16:45
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Necron codex page 64 right column, last para.
What's the issue?
Im on electronic so I don't really get the page references I'm afraid. But I simply didn't understand how the formations work, the way the blocks look it seems like you would have to take a destroyer cult. Typically that kind of hierarchical display signifies, well, a hierarchy that must be followed in order to gain access to units.
Probably just me being silly, I understand now, you can take basically anything but following the decurion rules confers benefits, its all good.
Affirm, basically it says entries with the funny little symbol is a formation and is played in accordance with the 40k rule book. In a nut shell.
All sorted.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:19:10
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
What are people's thoughts on barge-lord wargear now?
Load up on upgrades, or run them cheap?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:25:10
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
Load up, especially the Sv2+ seems important. PS, Phylactery and Shroud are items I would take (with a Warscythe). In Mephrit I would probably take the Edge of Eternity and Thermasite with it.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 19:25:19
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:34:39
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Looking at some of the special characters here...
Anrakyr gets relentless as his default Warlord trait.
Combine with a full size unit of Immortals, and Szeras Cryptek buffing a substantial gunline further back (Being an old style orb for multiple units is really his big selling point now), and you can select the Phyrrian Eternals as the recipients of the Szeras buff.
Worst case scenario? You're S5 granting S6 on the charge with Furious Charge.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:43:25
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
I am curious about Zhandrekh,
There are two questions I still have about him:
-The rules he copies, how often do you encounter those?
-What Traits would be the best to take?
The three armies I play (with) most contain Orks and Blood Angels, so for me it seems like Zhandrekh always gives his unit FC.
Combining that with Szeras would be 'at worst' 20 Warriors charging with S6
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:45:32
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
The Barge seems less useful. Before it was always more scary than useful anyway, got a circle running landraiders and Hammerinators which would just destroy the lord every time given the chance.
I do think 2x 20 man warrior squads with a lord are going to be insanely hard to kill.
4+ save, 4+ reroll and rerolling ones, so you only kill one from an ordinary shot on a failure to roll 2/3. That is quite insane, and they will put out an average of 2x2HP a turn even not rapid fire range. Granted its a lot of points. It would absorb a lot of firepower, at that point I'd run the barge with just a warscythe, but no sweeping attacks now? Sucks.
But the two man squads could sink a landraider in a turn, drop a knight in two, even assuming you don't get rapid fire. Automatically Appended Next Post: Byte wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:Jaq Draco lives wrote: Byte wrote:No, why would you think that?
Their both individual formations.
Why would I think that? Because of the way its blocked out and only available in the decurion formation.
As it happens I've been looking and they aren't individual, by the looks of it you must take reclamation legion in order to gain access to others.
Necron codex page 64 right column, last para.
What's the issue?
Im on electronic so I don't really get the page references I'm afraid. But I simply didn't understand how the formations work, the way the blocks look it seems like you would have to take a destroyer cult. Typically that kind of hierarchical display signifies, well, a hierarchy that must be followed in order to gain access to units.
Probably just me being silly, I understand now, you can take basically anything but following the decurion rules confers benefits, its all good.
Affirm, basically it says entries with the funny little symbol is a formation and is played in accordance with the 40k rule book. In a nut shell.
All sorted.
Good stuff.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/02/01 19:46:58
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:52:15
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Anyone know how quickly Orikan is likely to call upon the ancient sprits of evil?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 19:58:38
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Crafty Clanrat
Germany
|
Big Blind Bill wrote:What are people's thoughts on barge-lord wargear now?
Load up on upgrades, or run them cheap?
I would advocate going cheap, actually. Since the CCB is no longer protected by RP it seems to be the achilles heel in CC. One could go warscythe + phaseshifter, but that brings him up to 180. I'd probably just go WS and call it a day. If you want survivable, on foot seems to be the way to go.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 20:01:22
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I don't know if this was already answered, but does Nemesor have to be the Warlord in order to call upon different Warlord Traits. In a way, it's like having two Warlords at once if you elected someone else.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 20:07:13
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Kangodo wrote:Load up, especially the Sv2+ seems important.
PS, Phylactery and Shroud are items I would take (with a Warscythe).
In Mephrit I would probably take the Edge of Eternity and Thermasite with it.
One interesting thing about the bargeLord is you can now add gauntlet of fire as a ranged weapon and keep your melee weapon. With sola thermasite the gauntlet of fire becomes S5. Make up a little bit for the loss of sweep attacks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 20:10:34
Subject: Re:New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'm now curious who's likely to win in a duel between equal points of an all-destroyer bodied Necrons army and an all Crisis Suit tau army.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 20:23:51
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
changemod wrote:Anyone know how quickly Orikan is likely to call upon the ancient sprits of evil?
T1: 0% T2 or faster: 16% T3 or faster: 44% T4 or faster: 72% I think that is the correct math on his Star-allignment. Slayer-Fan123 wrote:I don't know if this was already answered, but does Nemesor have to be the Warlord in order to call upon different Warlord Traits. In a way, it's like having two Warlords at once if you elected someone else.
It starts with "If Nemesor Zhandrekh is your Warlord, you may.."
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/02/01 20:25:01
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 20:47:18
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Kangodo wrote:changemod wrote:Anyone know how quickly Orikan is likely to call upon the ancient sprits of evil?
T1: 0%
T2 or faster: 16%
T3 or faster: 44%
T4 or faster: 72%
I think that is the correct math on his Star-allignment.
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:I don't know if this was already answered, but does Nemesor have to be the Warlord in order to call upon different Warlord Traits. In a way, it's like having two Warlords at once if you elected someone else.
It starts with "If Nemesor Zhandrekh is your Warlord, you may.."
Sounds fair, though somewhat disappointing. Still plan to use him as the Warlord any time I use him anyway, so no biggie.
I made my first list I posted elsewhere. It involves 8 Scytheguard and Orikan + a Destroyer Lord with the super Warscythe. Should be REALLY durable to run up the board.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 20:56:23
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
In that unit I would probably put him with Shields-Lychguard. If Orikan Empowers, you would have two models that fight with S7, AP2. Orikan has 5 attacks on the charge, a D-Lord would have 4 The Lord will have either a Shroud, for a rerollable 2+ or a Veil for teleportation. Voidreaper is quite weird.. Why would I want Fleshbane on a S7-weapon? One other thing I thought of: How do people feel about a Destroyer Lord with the Gauntlet of the Conflagrator? Nothing else.. You can Deep Strike him next to a squad, wipe out some Sv2+ models and jump away behind cover.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/01 21:07:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 21:06:11
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Isn't Voidreaper S8?
Your point stands, regardless.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/01 21:14:06
Subject: New Necrons 7th Edition Tactica
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
The Doomsday Ark is actually quite good and got a buff.
The reason, Gauss Flayer Arrays Independent Targeting. 5/10 Salvo that have Independent Targeting.
170 Points that's not bad at all. Putting out 20 Gauss Shots, plus a ST8 AP3 Blast when moving that's pretty good.
That Formation isn't to Shabby, 2 Annhilation Barges, 1 Doomsday Ark. 410 total for that amount of fire power is a great deal.
16 Tesla Shots
20 Gauss Shots
1 ST10 Large Blast
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/02/01 21:18:15
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
 |
 |
|