Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 14:29:53
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Omnipotent Necron Overlord
|
I've been a marine player for most of my history in 40k. Almost all of my armies used to use 2 5 man tacs with las cannons and no transports. Then I got 2 LSS with scouts and put the tacs away. LSS are good enough that I don't view them as a tax because their chance of getting their points back is actually pretty high when I give the Sargent melta bombs and a combi melta.
|
If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 14:49:23
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
SharkoutofWata wrote:...my Dark Angels will be built with pretty much everything being built as Troops because of Azrael.
And then GW will release a new DA codex where Azrael no longer makes wings troops because of Unbound. Seriously I gave up on planning future armies as you cant rely on rules having a constant points or even a direction unless it's crap like IGOUGO without interruption mechanism or shooting into cc not being allowed. Now I only buy what I like if avilable second hand and play what I have. They force you into the whole collection thing fast but sorry Im out. Well I saved myself a lot of money on models I'll never buy so thanks GW I guess.
|
From the initial Age of Sigmar news thread, when its "feature" list was first confirmed:
Kid_Kyoto wrote:
It's like a train wreck. But one made from two circus trains colliding.
A collosal, terrible, flaming, hysterical train wreck with burning clowns running around spraying it with seltzer bottles while ring masters cry out how everything is fine and we should all come in while the dancing elephants lurch around leaving trails of blood behind them.
How could I look away?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 15:32:32
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
Arizona
|
I run Tau, Necrons and Blood Angels. So I love troops.
I normally run about 50-60 Necrons Warriors, 48 Tau Firewarriors with one Fireblade Cadre, and I used to run a 90 troop Blood angels list. I would not give the heavy weapons unit any heavy weapons. Troops over all are the best point units in the game and you can really amass a lot of firepower and wounds.
|
I cried because I had no shoes, then I met a man who had no feet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 15:57:05
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
I like troops. Imperial Guardsmen are pretty nice weapon carriers, Dire Avengers have rending Bolters, Tactical Marines are useful objective campers and let's not even talk about Windrider Jetbikes.
|
Thought for the day: Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
30k Ultramarines: 2000 pts
Bolt Action Germans: ~1200 pts
AOS Stormcast: Just starting.
The Empire : ~60-70 models.
1500 pts
: My Salamanders painting blog 16 Infantry and 2 Vehicles done so far! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 17:00:56
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
Grey Knight Terminators, best Troop choice in the game.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 18:37:09
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
The Necron Decurion formation certainly makes it advantageous to loud up on troops.
|
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..." Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/18 18:50:15
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
If you could take 2 special weapons in a 10-man tactical squad, I'd be all over 3 in every SM list. Alas, you cannot.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 02:47:22
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
Why you say this! Cultists were my best friends, but then they had to charge flayed ones to buy my Berzerkers some time... Poor Billy he didn't stand a chance! *Starts Sobbing* WHY DID IT HAVE TO END THIS WAY!
But seriously it entirely depends which army, for Chaos our OBSCENELY high point cost per model makes cultists amazingly cheap bodies to keep on the field, able to tarpit or distract units to allow your specialists to get their job done
|
[Khorne Daemonkin Warband] 4/4/0 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 03:08:08
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
I really want to play an all-Ravenwing DA army with bikes as troops, but I don't have the money to spend on all those bikes! Maybe when I get my tax return I'll look into it if the Sammael on Jetbike model ever stops being out of stock. Back on topic, DA have several options to make things other than tacticals and scouts troops (which is good since our scouts cant have the aforementioned LSS). Even standard Land Speeders can be troops when taken as part of a Ravenwing attack squadron if Sammael or Azrael is in the list. Fast Objective Secured Skimmers? Yes, please!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 03:16:32
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hey man, IG veterans are the best elit...I mean best value troops in the game!
|
"Bringer of death, speak your name, For you are my life, and the foe's death." - Litany of the Lasgun
2500 points
1500 points
1250 points
1000 points |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 04:44:52
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
ZergSmasher wrote:I really want to play an all-Ravenwing DA army with bikes as troops, but I don't have the money to spend on all those bikes! Maybe when I get my tax return I'll look into it if the Sammael on Jetbike model ever stops being out of stock. Back on topic, DA have several options to make things other than tacticals and scouts troops (which is good since our scouts cant have the aforementioned LSS). Even standard Land Speeders can be troops when taken as part of a Ravenwing attack squadron if Sammael or Azrael is in the list. Fast Objective Secured Skimmers? Yes, please!
Check here- they have the Dark Vengeance ones for 15 bucks for three, which makes a Ravenwing a pretty damn palatable idea if all you have to do is buy other bits for weapons options:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/40K-Dark-Vengeance-Dark-Angels-Ravenwing-Bike-Squad-Bits-3-Bitz-S-/191516261700?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2c97423d44
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/20 04:46:08
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 04:46:19
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
kronk wrote:If you could take 2 special weapons in a 10-man tactical squad, I'd be all over 3 in every SM list. Alas, you cannot.
It's literally the easiest fix for Tactical Marines to be more appealing. I say that over and over (though Heavy Flamers would be nice, seeing as Blood Angels get them but Salamanders don't...)
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 04:56:34
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
Troops fill a very important role in the Imperial Guard - after all a single one of our troops choices can have over 130 bodies, only the worst riptide spam has a chance of killing them all before turn 6
And if you do it right you can have two of those in a 500 point game, I know I have only been outnumbered once and that was another IG player
|
{url=http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/675142.page]{img]http://images.dakkadakka.com/gallery/2012/11/8/429237_md-.jpg{/img]{/url] |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 05:44:57
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
How often do you think your actually going to totally table your opponent? If you think you can do it every single game and actually do it, then you dont need troops. However, you may need to find opponents who are better players.
I have no problem taking troops and i have some of the weakest ones in the game. This because I understand the concept of using them to their strengths and making effective decisions in games. I dont win every game but I win more than I lose.
The thing you want to think about is do you really want to spend all your time complaining about "having to take them" and not enjoying the game or do you want to learn to use them effectively and enjoy the game?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 06:40:28
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
EVIL INC wrote:How often do you think your actually going to totally table your opponent? If you think you can do it every single game and actually do it, then you dont need troops.
You do realize that everything scores in 7th, right?
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 06:46:13
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
I use tacticals with heavy weapons (Missile launchers or lascannons). They are good for home objectives.
|
If you wish to grow wise, learn why brothers betray brothers. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 07:01:20
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Peregrine wrote: EVIL INC wrote:How often do you think your actually going to totally table your opponent? If you think you can do it every single game and actually do it, then you dont need troops.
You do realize that everything scores in 7th, right?
I'm well aware that everything "scores in 7th". thats why I pointed that out myself. However, i had thought I read about some sorta rule like objective secured or something like that where troops choices were better at it than non-troop choices. I had not realized they had ditched that so soon. For some reason, I thought that was a current rule.
Draco, your right. that is exactly the sort of way you can maximize their effectiveness. Combat squads allow one slot to claim 2 objectives. if you have a few, you can layer them to provide extra cheap coverage that can take pot shots at enemy and stand up to most attackers.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 10:34:01
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
EVIL INC wrote:I'm well aware that everything "scores in 7th". thats why I pointed that out myself. However, i had thought I read about some sorta rule like objective secured or something like that where troops choices were better at it than non-troop choices. I had not realized they had ditched that so soon. For some reason, I thought that was a current rule.
You know, it's funny how someone who cares so much about rule #1 that they have to mention it in their signature doesn't seem to have any problem making sarcastic posts (or making stuff up about "pointing it out yourself" when you did no such thing). It's almost like for you the forum rules are just an opportunity to provoke people and "win" the argument...
Anyway, "objective secured" doesn't change the point I was making: that your "you need troops unless you're going to table your opponent every game" claim is just laughably wrong in 7th. Objective secured is a rule that doesn't come up all that often, most of the time units without it are sufficient to win the game. And don't forget that taking fewer troops often means doing a better job of killing opposing scoring units and leaving your own in uncontested control of objectives. There are plenty of viable strategies that win the game by scoring objectives without investing in troops, and tabling is only a tiny and mostly irrelevant part of that.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/02/20 10:36:16
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 10:47:57
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
I use Iyanden, so troops are awesome.
That being said I do actually like the troops of pretty much all the codices. I think it's good to still have a decent core of them and to strengthen that with others. Everything is scoring, but troops with objective secured can be useful for denying.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 12:24:05
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Omnipotent Necron Overlord
|
They are okay but not great. Much rather have AM vets in a chimera or Necron Immortals.
|
If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 12:39:22
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: kronk wrote:If you could take 2 special weapons in a 10-man tactical squad, I'd be all over 3 in every SM list. Alas, you cannot.
It's literally the easiest fix for Tactical Marines to be more appealing. I say that over and over (though Heavy Flamers would be nice, seeing as Blood Angels get them but Salamanders don't...)
Exactly. If Chaos can, why can't my Imperial Fists?
Jerks.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 12:41:59
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
CSM: I hate regular CSM as they're awful. Plague Marines are good, but pricy, and I need a lord to unlock them. Cultists are good, but are often a tax more than anything.
Daemons: Horrors are great, Nurglings are good, Daemonettes are decent
IG: Both Veterans and Platoons are good but play very differently. I dislike having to take the PCS-tax, but blob guard is a lot of fun to play. Just gotta use orders and other strength multipliers properly (good thing our psykers get Divination, eh?)
Renegades: Plague Zombies are excellent, but require me to make my demagogue my WL. Mutant Rabble are cultists just better (cheaper with better options for upgrades). Infantry Squads seem really good with the new Vraks-formation where destroyed units come back on a 2+, but I haven't had the chance to try it nor do I own enough models to do it the way I think will be the most efficient.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 15:20:51
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
No way. Ork Boyz. Best troops in the game.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 15:25:49
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
I wish inquisition got troops. Then I can run MSU henchmen again XD
|
+ Thought of the day + Not even in death does duty end.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 15:30:06
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
I think Objective Secured has come up once for me in a game, and my opponent was the one to point out that I got that benefit. Honestly, I don't think I've ever gone "Darn, if only I had a Tactical/Bike/Scout squad there to secure that objective!"
I mean, considering that you draw and score on your turn, it's not come up often.
That being said, I have only played two eternal war missions since 7th came out.
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 15:31:39
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
|
I'm not a big fan of troops. I usually take them more for the transport than what they can do (serpents and pods). With everything scoring, AP2 weapons everywhere, more OP big models coming out, etc I just haven't found troops very useful.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 15:42:24
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Prophetic Blood Angel Librarian
|
The 55pt spawn I just used in my last battle turned out to be one of the most effective units I've ever used for their points.
Automatically Appended Next Post: (They're troops btw)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/20 15:42:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 15:43:01
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: kronk wrote:If you could take 2 special weapons in a 10-man tactical squad, I'd be all over 3 in every SM list. Alas, you cannot.
It's literally the easiest fix for Tactical Marines to be more appealing. I say that over and over (though Heavy Flamers would be nice, seeing as Blood Angels get them but Salamanders don't...)
Just use your Marines as Battle Sisters then. Cheaper per model and they get double specials. Oh, and a 6++ so you can occasionally shrug off the deluge of AP3 Ignores Cover.
|

"That time I only loaded the cannon with powder. Next time, I will fill it with jewels and diamonds and they will cut you to shrebbons!" - Nogbad the Bad. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 16:57:43
Subject: Re:Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Xenohunter Acolyte with Alacrity
|
Both on my Blood Angels and Harlequins - hell yes. With BA, Tacticals can equip arguably one of best heavy choices in-game - Heavy Flamer, as well as they are versatile and solid army choice by themselves - one which can stand both in shooting as well as in assault (thanks to glorious Furious Charge). And Harlequin Troupes - no words needed, just look on dem crispy detailed models and amazing CC weaponry
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/02/20 16:58:33
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/20 17:15:01
Subject: Troops. Do you really want to take them?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
My armored battlegroup hinges on my siege tank and battle tank squadrons.
|
|
 |
 |
|