| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/26 01:13:58
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
Warrington
|
Quick question. Plague marines have toughness 5 basic. They also come with mark of nurgle which gives them +1 toughness. Does this mean they are toughness 6 ? Sorry if this is a Noob question I amnew to chaos .
|
6000 pts of Foot Guard
"I once gave the order to one of my platoons to fix bayonets and charge a squad of genestealers. If they believed in the emperor hard enough they could win... I don't think they believed enough..." |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/26 01:23:49
Subject: Re:Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
From 'Marks of Chaos' on page 30 of Codex Chaos Space Marines, second paragraph:
When a Mark of Chaos is listed in a unit's special rules, its effects will have already been taken into account in its profile, where applicable.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/26 04:14:33
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
Troops which already have a mark of chaos have the mark included in their profile. For example: Plague Marines- T4 by default, T5 with MoN Noise Marines- I4 by default, I5 with MoS Thousand Sons- 5++ by default, 4++ with MoT
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/09/26 04:14:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/26 08:39:48
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
Warrington
|
Thanks everyone.
|
6000 pts of Foot Guard
"I once gave the order to one of my platoons to fix bayonets and charge a squad of genestealers. If they believed in the emperor hard enough they could win... I don't think they believed enough..." |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/26 09:17:39
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Crazed Spirit of the Defiler
Eye of Terror
|
if they did not have that rule rubric marines would be a lot more appealing
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/27 16:34:22
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So stick them on a bike
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/09/27 18:12:40
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Scorpionov wrote:if they did not have that rule rubric marines would be a lot more appealing
Why? Invulnerable saves are not part of the profile nor does it state anywhere that Rubric marines have a 4++ so this rule literally makes no difference to them at all.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 03:51:18
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
FlingitNow wrote: Scorpionov wrote:if they did not have that rule rubric marines would be a lot more appealing
Why? Invulnerable saves are not part of the profile nor does it state anywhere that Rubric marines have a 4++ so this rule literally makes no difference to them at all.
Oh, by the Emperor's rotting skull, you know what he meant. Back off. And is there a figurative form of "makes no difference at all"? Your "literally" is erroneous.
As previously stated, CSM bikers with mark of nurgle can really tank damage (not that plague marines aren't good too).
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/10/01 03:51:55
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 11:53:41
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Lobukia wrote: FlingitNow wrote: Scorpionov wrote:if they did not have that rule rubric marines would be a lot more appealing
Why? Invulnerable saves are not part of the profile nor does it state anywhere that Rubric marines have a 4++ so this rule literally makes no difference to them at all.
Oh, by the Emperor's rotting skull, you know what he meant.
... I didn't. I've been patiently waiting for Scorp to explain what he meant - I can see the obvious benefit of not knowing this rule on Plaguies and Noisies, but the benefit to Rubrics eludes me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 12:11:45
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Quanar wrote: Lobukia wrote: FlingitNow wrote: Scorpionov wrote:if they did not have that rule rubric marines would be a lot more appealing
Why? Invulnerable saves are not part of the profile nor does it state anywhere that Rubric marines have a 4++ so this rule literally makes no difference to them at all.
Oh, by the Emperor's rotting skull, you know what he meant.
... I didn't. I've been patiently waiting for Scorp to explain what he meant - I can see the obvious benefit of not knowing this rule on Plaguies and Noisies, but the benefit to Rubrics eludes me.
Jeez. He meant that it would be great if the save was improved. And now lets drop that line of thought, it's pointless. The original question was answered.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/10/01 12:12:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 13:30:06
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
nekooni wrote: Quanar wrote: Lobukia wrote: FlingitNow wrote: Scorpionov wrote:if they did not have that rule rubric marines would be a lot more appealing
Why? Invulnerable saves are not part of the profile nor does it state anywhere that Rubric marines have a 4++ so this rule literally makes no difference to them at all.
Oh, by the Emperor's rotting skull, you know what he meant.
... I didn't. I've been patiently waiting for Scorp to explain what he meant - I can see the obvious benefit of not knowing this rule on Plaguies and Noisies, but the benefit to Rubrics eludes me.
Jeez. He meant that it would be great if the save was improved. And now lets drop that line of thought, it's pointless. The original question was answered.
The save is improved. They start with an Aura of Dark Majesty for a 5++ and have mark of Tzeentch which makes that a 4++. Seriously how does this rule make any difference to Rubric marines?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 13:57:02
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
FlingitNow wrote:The save is improved. They start with an Aura of Dark Majesty for a 5++ and have mark of Tzeentch which makes that a 4++. Seriously how does this rule make any difference to Rubric marines?
The jokingly made statement asked for a further improved save from the "4++" presented, making it a "3++". Yes, we get that the rules do not allow for that - which was the joke.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 17:22:11
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
nekooni wrote: FlingitNow wrote:The save is improved. They start with an Aura of Dark Majesty for a 5++ and have mark of Tzeentch which makes that a 4++. Seriously how does this rule make any difference to Rubric marines?
The jokingly made statement asked for a further improved save from the "4++" presented, making it a "3++". Yes, we get that the rules do not allow for that - which was the joke.
What 4++ presented? That is the point made earlier. No where does it state that Rubric Marines have a 4++. So how would removing the rule many ANY difference to Rubric marines at all?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 17:32:37
Subject: Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
FlingitNow wrote:nekooni wrote: FlingitNow wrote:The save is improved. They start with an Aura of Dark Majesty for a 5++ and have mark of Tzeentch which makes that a 4++. Seriously how does this rule make any difference to Rubric marines?
The jokingly made statement asked for a further improved save from the "4++" presented, making it a "3++". Yes, we get that the rules do not allow for that - which was the joke.
What 4++ presented? That is the point made earlier. No where does it state that Rubric Marines have a 4++. So how would removing the rule many ANY difference to Rubric marines at all?
The original thought probably didn't go so far into detail as to think "gee within the rules, it seems that adding to the Rubric Marines invulnerable saves wouldn't really make any sense, but what if the wording was such that it would?" and more along the lines of "it would be cool if Rubrics got a 3++ save".
That's the point. You are putting a lot more emphasis on the rules than the original thought even had.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 17:57:42
Subject: Re:Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Well sorry for not getting the joke then, always a bit difficult in a purely text-based conversation.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/10/01 18:07:38
Subject: Re:Plague marine toughness 6?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Quanar wrote:Well sorry for not getting the joke then, always a bit difficult in a purely text-based conversation.
It's alright. I only got it because I've spent an inordinate amount of time flipping through the Chaos Codex hoping some sort of new workable combination would present itself to me. Alas I am empty handed.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|