Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2015/11/16 17:15:53
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
Drawing their lineage from early online networks including RPG-based multiuser dungeons, sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ require participants to build a unique persona—a character—that will be “played” by its user. As I believe most would acknowledge, this persona is part real and part imaginary—effectively, the side created for public presentation. Any gamer could tell you that is or her RPG characters are just that: a component of his or her personality or intellect that is given life by the character.
Could a large portion of the vitriol and hate that is so much a part of social networks and internet comment sections be a manifestation of these hidden, partially imaginary personas? Did we gamers unwittingly unleash a Pandora's Box of nerd-rage on the world by encouraging the creation of these personas online?
No doubt the anonymity of the internet makes a person's inner scumbag come out, but a lot of commenting sections require users to link to their social media, in a sense removing that anonymity by exposing who the person is to the world. And that reveal hasn't stopped us still being donkey-caves to one another. So are we all just playing dickish characters online?
Full article:
Spoiler:
Excerpted from Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons by Michael Witwer. Out now from Bloomsbury.
Dungeons & Dragons changed the world, but in ways far more abstract than video games and computer technologies. Although it is debatable whether D&D ever became a thoroughly mainstream activity, as a 1983 New York Times article had speculated, referring to it as “the great game of the 1980s,” D&D and its role-playing game derivatives are beloved by a relatively small but dedicated group of individuals, affectionately (and proudly) known as geeks. Although the term geek is not exclusive to role-playing gamers, the activities of this particular community have often been viewed as the most archetypal form of geekiness. Labels aside, what is notable is that the activities of this RPG audience were highly correlated with interests in other activities such as early computers, digital technologies, visual effects, and the performing arts. In this way, the game assembled and inspired this early group of geeks, though small in number, who became the computer programmers, fantasy writers, video game designers, and film stars of today—the leaders and masters of the information age.
If you have ever played a first-person shooter video game like Call of Duty, a massively multiplayer online role-playing game like World of Warcraft, or a computer role-playing game like Final Fantasy; if you have ever logged on to an online virtual world like Second Life or experienced the wildly popular Game of Thrones television series and books, then you are already tangentially familiar with Dungeons & Dragons. Simply put, this seminal game made these later multibillion-dollar pop culture phenomena possible. D&D helped establish our dominant cultural moment: We live in an era when it is chic to be geek.
First distributed in 1974, D&D effectively created the role-playing-game industry—clear-cut D&D derivative games, and in fact all RPGs, came from this influential work. Everything from the successful Traveller and Call of Cthulhu RPGs to Vampire: The Masquerade, Pathfinder, Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition, and numerous others were either directly or indirectly inspired by the advent of D&D. “There’s a reason why nearly every big-name American game designer will cite D&D as a formative influence,” wrote D&D 5th Edition co-designer Rodney Thompson, “because the principles of D&D help form the foundation upon which modern game design is built.” By the end of the 1970s, dozens of RPG and related gaming companies had opened their doors, and today there are hundreds. D&D inspired and enabled the people who started these companies, all individuals who were once recreational gamers and enthusiasts, to take their interest to the next level. This not only triggered a virtual flood of ideas and creativity in the gaming world but, from a pragmatic standpoint, also created jobs and opportunities for many others.
Without D&D there would be no basis for computer role-playing games or massively multiplayer online role-playing games. The relationship between these institutions and tabletop RPGs is self-evident, each ending its categorical title with role-playing game. While traditional tabletop RPGs never fully broke into the mainstream, both role-playing video games and multiplayer online games have become legitimate pop culture phenomena. According to authors Brad King and John Borland, D&D put this industry into motion by attracting “a community of, mostly, young men who were at the same time discovering the power and creativity offered by computer programming. In seeking to combine these two loves, this group of programmers, developers, and game players would over time profoundly shape an industry that would ultimately come to rival Hollywood in terms of scope and influence.”
Beginning as simple D&D-inspired text-based adventure games like Zork, early programmers used these concepts to create some of the earliest online games and communities, called multiuser dungeons. These adventure games, and their online adaptations, are the acknowledged ancestors of titles like Might and Magic, Final Fantasy, Diablo, The Elder Scrolls, World of Warcraft, EverQuest, Star Wars: The Old Republic, Ultima, Eve Online, and even Nintendo’s The Legend of Zelda. With over 10 million subscribers by itself, World of Warcraft, or WoW, is as popular as some of the biggest shows on television.
This is not to ignore D&D’s impact on other video game types, most notably first-person shooters. John Carmack and John Romero largely created this monstrously successful genre of video game with their release of Castle Wolfenstein and their subsequent release of the legendary Doom. Notably, Carmack and Romero were prolific Dungeons & Dragons players, and one need not look far in their games to see D&D’s proverbial fingerprints all over them, whether it be the dungeon/maze element to their design, the monsters that you fight, or even the gaming aspects of first-person character assumption.
With millions of copies sold for some of the larger franchises, first-person shooters have, so far, been the games of the 21st century. Titles such as Call of Duty, Halo, and Medal of Honor control a massive share of the video game industry—a trend recently demonstrated by the release of Activision Blizzard’s multiplayer online first-person shooter Destiny. The game achieved over $325 million in sales in its first five days—a feat rarely if ever accomplished in any established form of entertainment.
Sharing their technological infrastructure with multiplayer online games, massively popular virtual worlds, such as Second Life and Habbo, would also have lacked the foundations for development without D&D. The entire concept of developing a character and assuming an “avatar” has its origins deeply rooted in the earliest role-playing games.
The extraordinary successes of the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy and the more recent Game of Thrones television series are but a couple of examples of how inundated popular culture has become with the formerly esoteric world of fantasy. To be sure D&D did not create the fantasy genre, but it certainly popularized it in a very personal way that not only bolstered its audience but also multiplied its creators and innovators. Who or what was carrying the fantasy torch through the 1970s, ’80s, and ’90s? Who was providing the fundamental structure for fantasy characters, settings, and plots? According to RPG scholar Michael Tresca, “Dungeons & Dragons acted as a translation of sorts for the fantasy genre.” D&D, and RPGs in general, provided a new level of personalization for these worlds. It created an atmosphere of do-it-yourself fantasy and science-fiction storytelling that, according to Jay Little, designer of Fantasy Flight Games’ Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Roleplaying Game, “created a new way for fans to interact with fantasy literature and culture.” Now anyone could be part of the story.
Regarding D&D’s influence on technology, Adam Rogers, an editor at Wired magazine, contends, “Mr. Gygax’s game allowed geeks to venture out of our dungeons, blinking against the light, just in time to create the present age of electronic miracles.” And so they did. It wasn’t the jocks or the prom kings and queens who created the social and business infrastructure of the 21st century. It was the geeks and the nerds who spent their Friday nights playing with their computers and Saturday nights playing a little D&D with their friends. In this way, D&D filled an important social gap for those less inclined to mingle.
Providing camaraderie through D&D and its role-playing offspring might, in fact, be D&D’s greatest legacy. “It founded a means for socially awkward people to socialize,” said early TSR employee and Dragon editor Tim Kask. To these people, D&D gave companions—not just friends but fellow adventurers, sharing dangerous journeys and exotic quests.
The bonds built between fellow gamers are indeed unique. Not only do they share imaginary adventures and a fair share of make-believe peril, but they reveal facets of their personalities that most mainstream friendships would never see. How many modern friends can say that together they have stormed dungeons, slain dragons, and been brought to the brink of death and back countless times? Though these experiences are imaginary, they are derived from a part of each gamer’s personality, a part that most people would never let anyone see—the dreamer inside. These unabashed and unashamed group imagination exercises no doubt form the basis for deep and long-lasting real-life relationships.
But the social legacy of D&D reaches even the mainstream avenues of online social networks and social media. Shortly after Gary’s death, Wired’s Adam Rogers wrote, “Gary Gygax died last week and the universe did not collapse. This surprises me a little bit, because he built it.” He goes on to credit Gygax and D&D with laying the foundation for “the social and intellectual structure of our world.” And while it may be far-reaching to ascribe all things social media, and indeed their success, to Gary Gygax and Dungeons & Dragons, it is important to acknowledge that these technologies use concepts and platforms that were originally unique to RPGs. Drawing their lineage from early online networks including RPG-based multiuser dungeons, sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ require participants to build a unique persona—a character—that will be “played” by its user. As I believe most would acknowledge, this persona is part real and part imaginary—effectively, the side created for public presentation. Any gamer could tell you that is or her RPG characters are just that: a component of his or her personality or intellect that is given life by the character. So while tabletop D&D may never be a fully mainstream activity, its influence has brought about a very mainstream cultural shift. Through video games, fantasy films, social media, and other modern technologies, D&D-inspired concepts have subversively infiltrated our society—the world has gone geek.
Excerpted and adapted from Empire of Imagination: Gary Gygax and the Birth of Dungeons & Dragons by Michael Witwer. Out now from Bloomsbury.
2015/11/16 17:26:33
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
I am constantly surprised by the vile things people are comfortable posting with their name, picture and a link to their acquaintances and life.
BlaxicanX wrote: A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.
2015/11/16 23:15:39
Subject: Re:The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
D&D was seminal part of modern gaming culture, but that would have occurred anyway. Even if RPG's had not developed, which is extremely unlikely as adding a persona to a player in a game was inevitable. The core elements of RPG's preexisted in boardgames based on popular fiction. Fantasy was already gaining in popularity due to Tolkien, Howard and Lewis.
As for the information revolution that was already inevitable. Take this far sighted prediction from Arthur C Clarke from 1974, the year D&D was first published:
Clarke can be forgiven for not predicting miniaturisation of computers, and expected consoles in homes rather than home computers. But he is spot on.
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion.
2015/11/17 08:26:06
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
D&D was an evolutionary process. The initial game system was not an RPG but a skirmish fantasy game. It was Gygax's players who added personality to the unit leaders and wizards. Gygax saw this and ran with it, from this D&D was born.
Had it not done so the expanding complexity of computer games would have necessitated the change.
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion.
2015/11/17 18:59:28
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
No doubt the anonymity of the internet makes a person's inner scumbag come out, but a lot of commenting sections require users to link to their social media, in a sense removing that anonymity by exposing who the person is to the world. And that reveal hasn't stopped us still being donkey-caves to one another. So are we all just playing dickish characters online?
I think your next-to-last sentence obviates the last. People are donkey-caves IRL, and will continue to be donkey-caves online. No false characters or fantasy masks required.
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised.
2015/11/17 19:07:48
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
No doubt the anonymity of the internet makes a person's inner scumbag come out, but a lot of commenting sections require users to link to their social media, in a sense removing that anonymity by exposing who the person is to the world. And that reveal hasn't stopped us still being donkey-caves to one another. So are we all just playing dickish characters online?
I think your next-to-last sentence obviates the last. People are donkey-caves IRL, and will continue to be donkey-caves online. No false characters or fantasy masks required.
Part of the justification for atrocious online behavior was anonymity as this NSFW language graphic playfully shows.
Spoiler:
I was merely pointing out that anonymity is becoming less of a thing online, so that justification for bad behavior is less relevant.
2015/11/17 19:11:06
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
Yeah, I've seen the comic before, but I don't think it was true then, and I don't think it is true now. There are a lot of donkey-caves in the world. The internet just gives them an audience and an echo-chamber.
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised.
2015/11/17 19:29:32
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
Psienesis wrote: Yeah, I've seen the comic before, but I don't think it was true then, and I don't think it is true now. There are a lot of donkey-caves in the world. The internet just gives them an audience and an echo-chamber.
Okay.
I don't disagree with your statement that there are a lot of donkey-caves in the world. I do disagree regarding anonymity's influence, however. I think anonymity gives people opportunity to do or say things they wouldn't otherwise do or say.
Otherwise why would people don literal masks when performing crimes or committing hate speech?
I do wonder if the comic above touched on a "truth" from the early days of the internet that is no longer true.
Perhaps we are so accustomed to online vitriol (which perhaps stemmed from the more ubiquitous anonymity that websites used to provide) that it has become the accepted form of behavior while online despite our personal information now being tied to our horrible postings.
I dunno. Interesting to think about, though.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/11/17 19:30:13
2015/11/17 19:39:23
Subject: The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
Psienesis wrote: Yeah, I've seen the comic before, but I don't think it was true then, and I don't think it is true now. There are a lot of donkey-caves in the world. The internet just gives them an audience and an echo-chamber.
Okay.
I don't disagree with your statement that there are a lot of donkey-caves in the world. I do disagree regarding anonymity's influence, however. I think anonymity gives people opportunity to do or say things they wouldn't otherwise do or say.
Otherwise why would people don literal masks when performing crimes or committing hate speech?
I do wonder if the comic above touched on a "truth" from the early days of the internet that is no longer true.
Perhaps we are so accustomed to online vitriol (which perhaps stemmed from the more ubiquitous anonymity that websites used to provide) that it has become the accepted form of behavior while online despite our personal information now being tied to our horrible postings.
I dunno. Interesting to think about, though.
Maybe a bit but I don't really think so? Mainly, since "I was there" in the early days of the internet (and the early days of PCs in the home in general) what I saw was people online would be jerks if they were jerks IRL, and would not be if they were not. The only thing that really separated them was that their RL jerkiness would be slightly more filtered, depending on their present company, than it was online, but only to a degree, and mostly out of fear of reprisals and repercussions. Like... people who, IRL, were closeted racists would go full-bore Klansman online. They wouldn't IRL because they were pretty certain someone would beat their ass.
What the comic, and the idea it implies, suggests is that if you give anyone anonymity, they will become d-bags. I disagree with the concept, I knew *plenty* of really awesome people in those days, even going back into the BBS and usenet days, but I also knew a bunch of complete d-bags, and rarely did the personality types flip when encountering them IRL. Sure, some of the trolliest of trolls I knew were, IRL, witty people with a biting sense of sarcasm, but that still kind of makes them jerks, they're just funny jerks. Online? Sarcasm doesn't translate in text well, so it just seems assholish, but, then again, these same people were assholish IRL to a greater or lesser extent, too.
It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised.
2015/11/18 04:22:47
Subject: Re:The Gygax Effect: D&D lays foundation for Information Age?
D&D was not in vogue enough in the 90s from what I recall to account for all the AOL users out there at the time. I want to say it was still the "devil's work" as of the early 90s in fact, though people who found that notion alluring might also be the kind of people to perpetuate such douchebaggery. I'm going with Mr Gabriel's previously mentioned theory. I think it's just some part of human nature.
I've never bought the anonymity = donkey-cave argument. People are donkey-caves in general (come on, I even apologize for it in my sig!). I love my moniker, but lacking it wouldn't make me any nicer or less likely to feel the need to put my less than subtle opinion on a monitor. Real names exist all over face book, twitter, reddit, tumblr, and other websites and there's no shortage of people saying really stupid crap. Lacking concrete and enforced rules like we see on Dakka, it always descends into an apparent contest to see who can be the biggest douche bag.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/11/21 14:06:51