Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 07:23:46
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Which is stupid but eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh
That's why medusas are a thing, I guess. And I think stuff like Manticore Missiles, Battlecannons and Earthshakers should be able to penetrate any armor worn by infantry, but we can't have nice things, apparently.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 07:25:16
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 07:25:32
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Douglas Bader
|
Ashiraya wrote:Said shell (assuming we're talking battle cannon/earthshaker?) would just bounce off the model's artificer armour anyway, as if it was little more than a bayonette.
This. It's important to remember that high-end power armor is really durable. It's quite likely that the chapter will be able to hose out the bloody remains of a space marine after their armor is hit by an earthshaker shell and give the priceless relic to another worthy member of the chapter. This is why you should always follow an artillery barrage with dedicated anti-armor weapons to destroy the armor and prevent it from being used against you in the future.
|
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 07:27:07
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Or what Peregrine said, that works too, eh.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 08:07:43
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
As long as everything falls flat before your artillery you're happy, eh?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 08:11:02
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Mhmm, haven't played much with my DKoK these past times, anyways, mostly been rolling out with my Scions.
So uh... make hotshot str: D
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 08:16:01
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
Hotshots bounce off artificer armour as well, even if they had been D. I love AA.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 08:16:20
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 08:32:45
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
I can give rending to my guns.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 09:58:32
Subject: Re:Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Tactical_Spam wrote: vipoid wrote: NorseSig wrote:
Another way to look at it is Eternal warrior on those units would serve as a way to demonstrate their intelligence.
By what possible measure?
Marneus Calgar determines what will hurt him before it hits so he knows when to dodge anything lethal
I find it worrying that you apparently see nothing wrong with that statement.
Firstly, isn't that the point of a to-wound roll of 1 always failing? Second, why is it that "random plot events" can only protect arbitrary characters? Why can't they protect an Archon? Or a SM sergeant destined for greatness? Or even an IG sergeant?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 12:36:56
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Between Alpha and Omega, and a little to the left
|
Which is hilarious coming from you, since the crux of your argument is "I don't like it that other people are allowed to have nice things".
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 12:58:00
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
I think what people need to remember is that this is a game. As such it is designed in a specific way, currently that design involves lots of high cost special characters, many of which due to lack of EW are garbage. Essentially if it is highly likely for my 200+ point character to die before it does anything it won't get taken. Is it "realistic" for these characters to tank artillery shells, probably not, but in general dodging/evasion is not part of the game either.
If you are going to eliminate things like multiple wounds and EW you should also eliminate high cost leaders all together and have most HQ models run 50 points because all the fancy offensive stats in the world don't matter when you are dead.
I said it earlier in the thread both EW and instant death should be done away with in game and be replaced by a system where weapons due more wounds to a target based on the difference between the weapon strength and the targets toughness.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 13:46:43
Subject: Re:Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle
|
vipoid wrote: Tactical_Spam wrote: vipoid wrote: NorseSig wrote:
Another way to look at it is Eternal warrior on those units would serve as a way to demonstrate their intelligence.
By what possible measure?
Marneus Calgar determines what will hurt him before it hits so he knows when to dodge anything lethal
I find it worrying that you apparently see nothing wrong with that statement
Thats what my Spiritual liege said and I'm gonna take it
|
H.B.M.C.- The end hath come! From now on armies will only consist of Astorath, Land Speeder Storms and Soul Grinders!
War Kitten- Vanden, you just taunted the Dank Lord Ezra. Prepare for seven years of fighting reality...
koooaei- Emperor: I envy your nipplehorns. <Magnus goes red. Permanently>
Neronoxx- If our Dreadnought doesn't have sick scuplted abs, we riot.
Frazzled- I don't generally call anyone by a term other than "sir" "maam" "youn g lady" "young man" or " HEY bag!"
Ruin- It's official, we've ran out of things to talk about on Dakka. Close the site. We're done.
mrhappyface- "They're more what you'd call guidlines than actual rules" - Captain Roboute Barbosa
Steve steveson- To be clear, I'd sell you all out for a bottle of scotch and a mid priced hooker.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 14:43:47
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Breng77 wrote:I think what people need to remember is that this is a game.
Agreed - hence there should be no plot armour.
'Badly.'
Breng77 wrote:currently that design involves lots of high cost special characters, many of which due to lack of EW are garbage. Essentially if it is highly likely for my 200+ point character to die before it does anything it won't get taken.
Another way to look at it is that characters with EW make all other characters look bad by being ridiculously survivable for their cost.
Breng77 wrote:
If you are going to eliminate things like multiple wounds and EW you should also eliminate high cost leaders all together and have most HQ models run 50 points because all the fancy offensive stats in the world don't matter when you are dead.
Well, I certainly wouldn't want to remove multiple wounds.
Breng77 wrote:
I said it earlier in the thread both EW and instant death should be done away with in game and be replaced by a system where weapons due more wounds to a target based on the difference between the weapon strength and the targets toughness.
How would that work? As in, how many points over the target's toughness would a weapon need to be to cause 2 wounds or 3?
I'm presuming it's not a 1:1 ratio otherwise it might as well be ID in most cases.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 14:49:22
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
vipoid wrote:With the game now including Gargantuan Creatures and other units that belong in Apocalypse, does anyone else think marine-sized models having EW is a little silly?
No, I think that including GCs and other unitst hat belong in Apocalypse is silly.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 14:49:56
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Melissia wrote: vipoid wrote:With the game now including Gargantuan Creatures and other units that belong in Apocalypse, does anyone else think marine-sized models having EW is a little silly?
No, I think that including GCs and other unitst hat belong in Apocalypse is silly.
Can't argue with that.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 15:57:06
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
Man, the hate is strong in this thread. Gooooood, goooood.
But seriously, OT, none of you would have a problem if your named characters died like chaff in the wind? I could live with that change, but my 300 point Chapter Master should now cost WAY less.
|
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 16:02:57
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Assassin with Black Lotus Poison
|
jreilly89 wrote:Man, the hate is strong in this thread. Gooooood, goooood. But seriously, OT, none of you would have a problem if your named characters died like chaff in the wind? I could live with that change, but my 300 point Chapter Master should now cost WAY less. I play tau, my named characters already do that
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/01/14 16:03:56
The Laws of Thermodynamics:
1) You cannot win. 2) You cannot break even. 3) You cannot stop playing the game.
Colonel Flagg wrote:You think you're real smart. But you're not smart; you're dumb. Very dumb. But you've met your match in me. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 16:16:24
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
jreilly89 wrote:Man, the hate is strong in this thread. Gooooood, goooood.
But seriously, OT, none of you would have a problem if your named characters died like chaff in the wind? I could live with that change, but my 300 point Chapter Master should now cost WAY less.
So, what exactly is not just killing but Instant Deathing all these named characters with no problems whatsoever?
Let's talk about Chapter Masters for a moment. I don't know what build you're using, but I've just made a biker one on battlescribe for 50pts less with T5, 4 wounds (obviously), a 2+/3+, and a S7 weapon that strikes at initiative with Digital Weapons (can even save 15pts by going Power Fist/Lightning Claw instead). And I haven't even applied Chapter Tactics yet.
Point being, why is he apparently so badly in need of EW? He can already take a Lascannon or Bright Lance to the face and shrug it off (assuming it even gets past his 3++). And, in fact, even a weapon that can ID him still has to get past that 3++. And that's before you even get into the protection offered by his squad (and LoS).
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 16:39:36
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
vipoid wrote: jreilly89 wrote:Man, the hate is strong in this thread. Gooooood, goooood.
But seriously, OT, none of you would have a problem if your named characters died like chaff in the wind? I could live with that change, but my 300 point Chapter Master should now cost WAY less.
So, what exactly is not just killing but Instant Deathing all these named characters with no problems whatsoever?
Let's talk about Chapter Masters for a moment. I don't know what build you're using, but I've just made a biker one on battlescribe for 50pts less with T5, 4 wounds (obviously), a 2+/3+, and a S7 weapon that strikes at initiative with Digital Weapons (can even save 15pts by going Power Fist/Lightning Claw instead). And I haven't even applied Chapter Tactics yet.
Point being, why is he apparently so badly in need of EW? He can already take a Lascannon or Bright Lance to the face and shrug it off (assuming it even gets past his 3++). And, in fact, even a weapon that can ID him still has to get past that 3++. And that's before you even get into the protection offered by his squad (and LoS).
EW in this case would be for Force and the rare S10. In fact, some would argue that, if he's on a Bike, EW is less needed. However, assuming he's on foot, he's more likely to need it. Way too easy to get enough S8+ that the minimum for a Chapter Master, 130, is risky.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 16:45:02
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
But why does he need it?
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:In fact, some would argue that, if he's on a Bike, EW is less needed. However, assuming he's on foot, he's more likely to need it. Way too easy to get enough S8+ that the minimum for a Chapter Master, 130, is risky.
But, again, why should Chapter Masters get EW and not other HQs?
You talk about S8-9 weapons being too much of a risk when he isn't on a bike, but what about characters who need bikes just to reach T4? If they can manage without EW then so can a Chapter Master.
Or, if Chapter Masters can't cope without EW, then other characters should also have EW. And when I say "characters" I mean actual customisable HQs, not 'one SC in the army'.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 16:46:04
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 20122012/01/14 16:48:51
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
vipoid wrote: jreilly89 wrote:Man, the hate is strong in this thread. Gooooood, goooood.
But seriously, OT, none of you would have a problem if your named characters died like chaff in the wind? I could live with that change, but my 300 point Chapter Master should now cost WAY less.
So, what exactly is not just killing but Instant Deathing all these named characters with no problems whatsoever?
Let's talk about Chapter Masters for a moment. I don't know what build you're using, but I've just made a biker one on battlescribe for 50pts less with T5, 4 wounds (obviously), a 2+/3+, and a S7 weapon that strikes at initiative with Digital Weapons (can even save 15pts by going Power Fist/Lightning Claw instead). And I haven't even applied Chapter Tactics yet.
Point being, why is he apparently so badly in need of EW? He can already take a Lascannon or Bright Lance to the face and shrug it off (assuming it even gets past his 3++). And, in fact, even a weapon that can ID him still has to get past that 3++. And that's before you even get into the protection offered by his squad (and LoS).
Because he's paying all those points for the protection? Let's look at a kitted out Chapter Master on a bike. With all his upgrades how much does he run? ~300? He should be able to take all those shoots and do that much damage, that's roughly 1/6 of your force (if playing 1850 points) for one guy! Automatically Appended Next Post: vipoid wrote:
But why does he need it?
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:In fact, some would argue that, if he's on a Bike, EW is less needed. However, assuming he's on foot, he's more likely to need it. Way too easy to get enough S8+ that the minimum for a Chapter Master, 130, is risky.
But, again, why should Chapter Masters get EW and not other HQs?
You talk about S8-9 weapons being too much of a risk when he isn't on a bike, but what about characters who need bikes just to reach T4? If they can manage without EW then so can a Chapter Master.
Or, if Chapter Masters can't cope without EW, then other characters should also have EW. And when I say "characters" I mean actual customisable HQs, not 'one SC in the army'.
I think all HQ's should get Eternal Warrior. It's crazy stupid guys like Azrael, Asmodai, Librarians, etc. don't, but random Chapter Master does.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 16:49:25
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 16:55:42
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
No, he's also paying a good deal of points for mobility and weapons. And, you know, the orbital bombardment.
Furthermore, T5 4 wounds and a 2+/3+ save is more than most armies can get even with their most heavily-armoured special characters - and few of those boast a 12" move and a S7 sword.
jreilly89 wrote:Let's look at a kitted out Chapter Master on a bike. With all his upgrades how much does he run? ~300?
Even a heavily kitted one is only 250. If you stick to basics he's barely over 200pts.
jreilly89 wrote:He should be able to take all those shoots and do that much damage, that's roughly 1/6 of your force (if playing 1850 points) for one guy!
Again, you're acting as if he dies to a stiff breeze without EW. He's still T5 4 wounds with a 2+/3+ save.
How the hell do you think other armies cope? Ones whose characters can't even come close to that level of protection, no matter how much they pay.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/01/14 16:57:25
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:10:34
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Chapter Masters fight in melee unlike Farseers, Ethereals, buffmanders and a whole host of other cowardly HQ.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:18:06
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
CMs fight in CC, so shouldn't be IDed by Krak missiles on foot or Railgun shots on bikes, but Farseers and Autarchs fight at range, so should be IDed by Plasma Guns and Krak Grenades on foot?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 17:18:38
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:23:37
Subject: Re:Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
|
How would that work? As in, how many points over the target's toughness would a weapon need to be to cause 2 wounds or 3?
I'm presuming it's not a 1:1 ratio otherwise it might as well be ID in most cases.
I explained my thought back on P. 2 of the thread. Essentially It ammounted to
S = T wound on 4s
S = T+1 Wound on 3s
S= T+2 or 3 wound on 2s
S = T + 4 or 5 wound on 2 causes 2 wounds
S = T + 6 or 7 wound on 2s causes 3 wounds
etc.
So for instance a T 4 model wound take 2 wounds from a S8 gun, which will instant death some models but not all. IT also improves T3 models by meaning S6 wound not cause 2 wounds, meaning it would take S7 to cause multiple wounds.
It is not a perfect system but it is better IMO than the current one.
Alternatively if you wanted to keep instant death and EW in the game but wanted some change a possibility would be to make Instant death causing attacks reduce EW models to a single wound.
Another way to look at it is that characters with EW make all other characters look bad by being ridiculously survivable for their cost
I don't feel that this is the case at all. IT makes them look bad because they are bad, they cost too many points and die to easily compared to noncharacter models/units of equal cost. Lets just look at say a 75 point HQ choice, without eternal warrior it is likely less durable than most units of equal cost due to instant death and having fewer wounds.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 17:26:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:31:56
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
There's lots S10 in the game.
Demolisher
DCCW
GMC
SHW
SW IC on TW mount with fist or hammer
Daemonhammer with Hammerhand
Etc.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:35:25
Subject: Re:Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Dozer Blades wrote:There's lots S10 in the game.
Demolisher
DCCW
GMC
SHW
SW IC on TW mount with fist or hammer
Daemonhammer with Hammerhand
Etc.
There's vastly more S8-9 and S6-7. A T5 character already gets EW against those.
Breng77 wrote:
I explained my thought back on P. 2 of the thread. Essentially It ammounted to
S = T wound on 4s
S = T+1 Wound on 3s
S= T+2 or 3 wound on 2s
S = T + 4 or 5 wound on 2 causes 2 wounds
S = T + 6 or 7 wound on 2s causes 3 wounds
etc.
So for instance a T 4 model wound take 2 wounds from a S8 gun, which will instant death some models but not all. IT also improves T3 models by meaning S6 wound not cause 2 wounds, meaning it would take S7 to cause multiple wounds.
It is not a perfect system but it is better IMO than the current one.
I wouldn't object to that system.
One thing though - how would you do Force Weapons (and other ID stuff that doesn't involve strength)? Or, would they just be removed.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/01/14 17:36:51
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:36:44
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
I just feel sorry for us Nid players, where is our smattering of EW rules?
Oh right yeah.....
|
Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be
By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.
"Feelin' goods, good enough". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:39:25
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
vipoid wrote:
No, he's also paying a good deal of points for mobility and weapons. And, you know, the orbital bombardment.
Furthermore, T5 4 wounds and a 2+/3+ save is more than most armies can get even with their most heavily-armoured special characters - and few of those boast a 12" move and a S7 sword.
Then blame GW for poor rules writing and for making SM their poster boys to sell the game. I'm all for leveling the playing field, but I think removing EW is a step in the wrong direction.
jreilly89 wrote:Let's look at a kitted out Chapter Master on a bike. With all his upgrades how much does he run? ~300?
Even a heavily kitted one is only 250. If you stick to basics he's barely over 200pts.
That's still a heavy chunk of points, considering a Wraithknight is not much over that and a Riptide is around the same for better survivability and firepower.
jreilly89 wrote:He should be able to take all those shoots and do that much damage, that's roughly 1/6 of your force (if playing 1850 points) for one guy!
Again, you're acting as if he dies to a stiff breeze without EW. He's still T5 4 wounds with a 2+/3+ save.
How the hell do you think other armies cope? Ones whose characters can't even come close to that level of protection, no matter how much they pay.
Because if a guy really is rocking that much gear, he should be able to take that much damage. That's the whole point of giving him all the upgrades, he's the hero character of your army.
Also, I think other armies cope by not investing that much in their HQs and spamming their best units. Even without EW, some armies can still have some nasty tricks up their sleeves, Ork's Lucky Stikk and the DEldar 2+ rerollable invuln come to mind.
Also, back up with the hostility. I'm not saying you wrote the rules, I'm just saying getting red of EW would open up a whole new list of problems.
|
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 17:44:37
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Compare a 200pt CM to a PL.
2+/3++ vs 2+/some have 4++ others don't
T5 vs T4
W4 vs W3
12" move vs mostly 6" move
S8ap2 I1 vs S4/5 AP2/3 I7
4A vs 4A
No EW vs EW
Clearly they get a lot for 200pts.
So you
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/14 18:01:32
Subject: Is Eternal Warrior outdated?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
jreilly89 wrote:
That's still a heavy chunk of points, considering a Wraithknight is not much over that and a Riptide is around the same for better survivability and firepower.
Yes, because we all know Wraithknights are the epitome of balance.
jreilly89 wrote:
Because if a guy really is rocking that much gear, he should be able to take that much damage.
And he can. Even without EW he can tank an absolutely ridiculous amount of firepower.
It takes 22 lascannon shots to kill this guy. That's 4 more than it takes to kill a land raider (which also have a small chance to get IDed by one), and 1 more than it takes to kill a Riptide with FNP. And, this isn't even including the Chapter Master's ability to divert wounds to his squad or get FNP (either through Iron Hands or via an Apothecary in the squad) or IWND.
jreilly89 wrote:
Also, I think other armies cope by not investing that much in their HQs and spamming their best units.
So do the same. No one is forcing you to take a 250pt Chapter Master.
jreilly89 wrote:Even without EW, some armies can still have some nasty tricks up their sleeves
You mean like a T5 2+/3+ 4-wound character on a bike?
jreilly89 wrote:
Also, back up with the hostility. I'm not saying you wrote the rules, I'm just saying getting red of EW would open up a whole new list of problems.
Then stop acting so entitled and maybe take a minute to appreciate what you've got. You have probably the single most durable non- SC in the game (not to mention also being one of the fastest and hardest hitting) - a character most other races would kill for - yet that's still not good enough for you. No, he has to be able to headbutt Demolisher Shells and take Force Weapons on the chin as well.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
|