Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:24:06
Subject: Re:40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
labmouse42 wrote:No more double stacks of cursed earth. Only one flickering fire form a screamer star.
Q : If there are 2 Daemon Psykers who cast Cursed Earth and they are within 12" of each other, do they have a +2 bonus to their invuln save?
A : No. Modifiers from identical psychic powers do not stack.
Q : If a unit includes multiple IC psykers, can they cast the same power (Psychic Shriek) multiple times, once for each IC
A : No.
In other news...
Q : How does a Gargantuan Creature move through difficult terrain?
A : Roll 3d6 and double the highest result.
Q : If a MC is also an IC, can it join other units? Can other ICs then join the unit that the MC is now a part of?
A : Yes, and No.
(What MCs are ICs)
Q : Can Swooping FMCs be hit with blast or Template attacks that don't target them, such as scattered Blasts and vehicle explosions?
A : No
Q : Can swooping FMCs be hit by nova and beam powers ?
A : Yes for nova powers, no for beam powers.
Well, if you go to the independent character FAQ, it states that if they are different independent characters they can cast the same power twice!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:25:29
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot
|
Inb4 "facebook posts aren't official rules"
I am loving the fact that summoned bloodthirsters can arrive in gliding mode!
|
"If you wait a few months, they'll pick one of the worst codexes and they'll nerf almost everything, its an abstract sort of balance, but it's the sort of balance gw likes...  " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:25:42
Subject: Re:40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
killerdou wrote: labmouse42 wrote:No more double stacks of cursed earth. Only one flickering fire form a screamer star.
Q : If there are 2 Daemon Psykers who cast Cursed Earth and they are within 12" of each other, do they have a +2 bonus to their invuln save?
A : No. Modifiers from identical psychic powers do not stack.
Q : If a unit includes multiple IC psykers, can they cast the same power (Psychic Shriek) multiple times, once for each IC
A : No.
In other news...
Q : How does a Gargantuan Creature move through difficult terrain?
A : Roll 3d6 and double the highest result.
Q : If a MC is also an IC, can it join other units? Can other ICs then join the unit that the MC is now a part of?
A : Yes, and No.
(What MCs are ICs)
Q : Can Swooping FMCs be hit with blast or Template attacks that don't target them, such as scattered Blasts and vehicle explosions?
A : No
Q : Can swooping FMCs be hit by nova and beam powers ?
A : Yes for nova powers, no for beam powers.
Well, if you go to the independent character FAQ, it states that if they are different independent characters they can cast the same power twice!
the image of the IC faq has errors, to the right in the comments from poster section it states to ignore it and use the written comments as the draft.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:26:51
Subject: Re:40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
blaktoof wrote:
the image of the IC faq has errors, to the right in the comments from poster section it states to ignore it and use the written comments as the draft.
Even some of those are contradictory.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:28:45
Subject: Re:40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
blaktoof wrote:killerdou wrote: labmouse42 wrote:No more double stacks of cursed earth. Only one flickering fire form a screamer star.
Q : If there are 2 Daemon Psykers who cast Cursed Earth and they are within 12" of each other, do they have a +2 bonus to their invuln save?
A : No. Modifiers from identical psychic powers do not stack.
Q : If a unit includes multiple IC psykers, can they cast the same power (Psychic Shriek) multiple times, once for each IC
A : No.
In other news...
Q : How does a Gargantuan Creature move through difficult terrain?
A : Roll 3d6 and double the highest result.
Q : If a MC is also an IC, can it join other units? Can other ICs then join the unit that the MC is now a part of?
A : Yes, and No.
(What MCs are ICs)
Q : Can Swooping FMCs be hit with blast or Template attacks that don't target them, such as scattered Blasts and vehicle explosions?
A : No
Q : Can swooping FMCs be hit by nova and beam powers ?
A : Yes for nova powers, no for beam powers.
Well, if you go to the independent character FAQ, it states that if they are different independent characters they can cast the same power twice!
the image of the IC faq has errors, to the right in the comments from poster section it states to ignore it and use the written comments as the draft.
In my defense, there was a picture, and text, of course I only looked at the picture
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:31:43
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
jokerkd wrote:Inb4 "facebook posts aren't official rules"
I am loving the fact that summoned bloodthirsters can arrive in gliding mode!
Whats better, you can summon the fearless KDK version, that generates blood tithe points.
|
DFTT |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:33:23
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
They addressed a lot of things having read through it all...but not the Thunderwolf Cavalry S9/S10 conundrum.
I still have a SW main mate who adamantly argues it as S10.
|
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:35:14
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Frozocrone wrote:They addressed a lot of things having read through it all...but not the Thunderwolf Cavalry S9/S10 conundrum.
I still have a SW main mate who adamantly argues it as S10.
Codex specific stuff will be coming.
|
DFTT |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:36:03
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Agile Revenant Titan
|
We have not seen Codex FAQs yet.
|
No earth shattering, thought provoking quote. I'm just someone who was introduced to 40K in the late 80's and it's become a lifelong hobby. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:36:04
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Frozocrone wrote:They addressed a lot of things having read through it all...but not the Thunderwolf Cavalry S9/S10 conundrum.
I still have a SW main mate who adamantly argues it as S10.
That would be in the codex FAQ which I believe they said were still to come.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:42:17
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot
|
Have they contradicted themselves with regards to the timing of reserves?
One answer states that drop pods arriving from reserves can generate a tactical objective card for an objective it lands on that turn because its still the start of the turn.
Another answer states that moving on from reserve is done at the start of the movement phase
|
"If you wait a few months, they'll pick one of the worst codexes and they'll nerf almost everything, its an abstract sort of balance, but it's the sort of balance gw likes...  " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:43:14
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I feel just SO justified in the "psychic powers don't need to roll to hit" department. But what's with the Independent Character not joining squads with Monstrous Creature Independent Characters? What if the IC is already in the squad that the MC IC wishes to join?
|
Galef wrote:If you refuse to use rock, you will never beat scissors. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:43:17
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ahh that makes sense, particularly if three people say so!
Still pleased that they did this. Time period might have been better, but the amount of questions they have had to sift through and clarify must have been hard, particularly when they have AoS to think about as well.
|
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:47:56
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Yarium wrote:I feel just SO justified in the "psychic powers don't need to roll to hit" department. But what's with the Independent Character not joining squads with Monstrous Creature Independent Characters? What if the IC is already in the squad that the MC IC wishes to join?
It's in the 'Monstrous & Gargantuan Creatures' FAQ:
Q: If a Monstrous Creature is also an Independent Character, can it join other units? Can other Independent Characters then join the unit that the Monstrous Creature is now a part of?
A: Yes to the first question. No to the second question.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:49:53
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Wait... GW means to say that Traditio was right about the grenade thing? Holy hell. That's a decent buff to vehicles in the Assault Phase (assuming no Str 6/7 spam stops that from happening  ).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/04 20:52:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:56:08
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Matt.Kingsley wrote:Wait... GW means to say that Traditio was right about the grenade thing? Holy hell.
That's a decent buff to vehicles in the Assault Phase (assuming no Str 6/7 spam stops that from happening  ).
To cue Walt Disney's Peter Pan, poor Tankbustas!
|
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 20:56:20
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Matt.Kingsley wrote:Wait... GW means to say that Traditio was right about the grenade thing? Holy hell..
Well, no... He's right now. He wasn't yesterday.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:00:19
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I also like no more transport sharing among Battle Brothers, as well as no more IC benefitting from detachment rules that they weren't purchased for.
|
YMDC = nightmare |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:05:28
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
That horse died days ago. You can stop beating it now.
|
2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:05:36
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Agile Revenant Titan
|
Frozocrone wrote:I also like no more transport sharing among Battle Brothers, as well as no more IC benefitting from detachment rules that they weren't purchased for.
There seemed to be a weekly debate on this forum regarding the IC issue, specifically regarding Skyhammer. Thankfully, GW is answering that one.
|
No earth shattering, thought provoking quote. I'm just someone who was introduced to 40K in the late 80's and it's become a lifelong hobby. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:13:21
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
Yarium wrote:I feel just SO justified in the "psychic powers don't need to roll to hit" department. But what's with the Independent Character not joining squads with Monstrous Creature Independent Characters? What if the IC is already in the squad that the MC IC wishes to join?
They answered that in a different spot, but basically, "joining" and "joined" are not completely equal. An IC cannot put himself in a position to join a unit in which an MC already exists. However, once joined, an MCIC doesn't kick out any other ICs that are currently joined.
Frozocrone wrote:I also like no more transport sharing among Battle Brothers,
Not true. They just cannot Embark during Deployment.
as well as no more IC benefitting from detachment rules that they weren't purchased for.
A stupid ruling since it basically means that if something like Stubborn is provided by the detachment, then it doesn't work with a joined IC, but Stubborn does work if it was on the unit's datasheet.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:26:45
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
EnTyme wrote:
That horse died days ago. You can stop beating it now.
Nobody's beating any horse. The rule now is what it is... assuming that they don't change their minds again between now and the final draft.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:28:08
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
EnTyme wrote:
That horse died days ago. You can stop beating it now.
I'm sorry but I found that funny.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:34:14
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
Geez, there are gonna have a huge impact. However, I'm glad to see any FAQ's at all. Sad to have lost my Krak Grenades in Assault phase, but whatever.
|
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:44:16
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot
|
I'm sad rhat assassins cant ride in drop pods anymore. But,saying that, they have made invisible units more vulnerable, so the culexus isn't the "must have" that it was
|
"If you wait a few months, they'll pick one of the worst codexes and they'll nerf almost everything, its an abstract sort of balance, but it's the sort of balance gw likes...  " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:47:31
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No more 4+ cover by sticking a Wraithknight's toe into a ruin. Fair enough! =]
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 21:59:35
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
My favorite has got to be the independsnt characters can not benefit from formation and detachment special rules!
Finally ending the nonsense on this board from a handful of people. Automatically Appended Next Post: Frozocrone wrote:They addressed a lot of things having read through it all...but not the Thunderwolf Cavalry S9/S10 conundrum.
I still have a SW main mate who adamantly argues it as S10.
They addressed it multiple then add
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/04 22:01:39
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 22:02:54
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot
|
Lets all just keep in mind that this is a draft. It can, has already, and probably will be changed again before it see official status
|
"If you wait a few months, they'll pick one of the worst codexes and they'll nerf almost everything, its an abstract sort of balance, but it's the sort of balance gw likes...  " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 22:03:01
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Not as Good as a Minion
|
gungo wrote:My favorite has got to be the independsnt characters can not benefit from formation and detachment special rules!
Finally ending the nonsense on this board from a handful of people.
So a CAD Cryptek cannot benefit from a Reclamation Legion's Move Through Cover.
A Blood Angel Captain in a SM Demi-Company Assault Squad doesn't count for Objective Secured.
A LOT of problems with this ruling that I am not sure they considered.
|
Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/04 22:04:36
Subject: 40K FAQ first draft posted...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Sarigar wrote: Frozocrone wrote:I also like no more transport sharing among Battle Brothers, as well as no more IC benefitting from detachment rules that they weren't purchased for.
There seemed to be a weekly debate on this forum regarding the IC issue, specifically regarding Skyhammer. Thankfully, GW is answering that one.
It was weekly because the same 5 people argued it constantly in every unrelated thread.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Charistoph wrote:gungo wrote:My favorite has got to be the independsnt characters can not benefit from formation and detachment special rules!
Finally ending the nonsense on this board from a handful of people.
So a CAD Cryptek cannot benefit from a Reclamation Legion's Move Through Cover.
A Blood Angel Captain in a SM Demi-Company Assault Squad doesn't count for Objective Secured.
A LOT of problems with this ruling that I am not sure they considered.
Holy hell man stop arguing about this.
It's ridiculous and sad at this point.
You lost
That ship has sailed
In the immortal words of frozen; let it go!!! Automatically Appended Next Post: jokerkd wrote:Lets all just keep in mind that this is a draft. It can, has already, and probably will be changed again before it see official status
It's a draft for clarity not for arguing or opinion
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/05/04 22:08:58
|
|
 |
 |
|