Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/20 21:39:43
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Charging Dragon Prince
|
Hah, I can't believe just how heated this thread got for a while. Yea, Blood Bowl is in the Old World, so was Mordheim, and Mordheim was set quite a bit of time before the events of Warhammer Fantasy.
All I care about is whether they keep the original flavor and fun, light-hearted nature of the game. That's what got me into it, and it will get me back into it as long as the fun comes back with it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/20 22:53:54
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Building a blood in water scent
|
I've always thought that BB was set in "an" Old World (as opposed to "the" Old World).
The existence of Cabalvision and Orca-Cola and the like in BB lore and absent from WFB lore?
|
We were once so close to heaven, St. Peter came out and gave us medals; declaring us "The nicest of the damned".
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'” |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/20 22:57:47
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Zealous Sin-Eater
Chico, CA
|
feeder wrote:I've always thought that BB was set in "an" Old World (as opposed to "the" Old World).
The existence of Cabalvision and Orca-Cola and the like in BB lore and absent from WFB lore?
Because it is.
But like WHFB and 40K there has been crossover and out right dumb ideas blurring settings by GW.
|
Peter: As we all know, Christmas is that mystical time of year when the ghost of Jesus rises from the grave to feast on the flesh of the living! So we all sing Christmas Carols to lull him back to sleep.
Bob: Outrageous, How dare he say such blasphemy. I've got to do something.
Man #1: Bob, there's nothing you can do.
Bob: Well, I guess I'll just have to develop a sense of humor. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/21 00:02:02
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Gun Mage
|
Yeah, it isn't "the" Old World. The only people who think it is apparently don't understand the concept of alternate continuities.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/21 00:16:18
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I was surprised how hurt people got over this!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/21 00:16:43
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/21 01:29:03
Subject: Re:Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I will be happy as long as it has nothing to do with AoS.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/21 03:09:43
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Gun Mage
|
Says the guy who's written the biggest rant in this thread.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 09:56:58
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Dudley, UK
|
I spoke to Andy Hoare over the weekend as I was at the Bugmans XXXXXX event at Warhammer World. Andy confirmed it's set in the Blood Bowl universe which is an alternative reality to the Old World/Age of Sigmar universe.
So it's very similar but instead of war they play Blood Bowl. Also means they can crank the dial up on the silly stuff
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 10:10:29
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I find that to be such a weird idea... How is it justified? In 3rd Edition, Blood Bowl is set in the Warhammer universe and Blood Bowl has not "replaced" warfare between the different factions—in fact it is entirely unrelated. The teams in the circuit are simply professional competitors that make their livelihood playing Blood Bowl, despite the wars going on around them (ok it is true, some teams just play the game for the love of the carnage, er I mean sport!). They are travelling entertainers, basically, and do not "represent" one faction or another. I would think a setting where Blood Bowl replaces war would make zero sense to me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 11:13:27
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Galadrin wrote:
I find that to be such a weird idea... How is it justified? In 3rd Edition, Blood Bowl is set in the Warhammer universe and Blood Bowl has not "replaced" warfare between the different factions—in fact it is entirely unrelated. The teams in the circuit are simply professional competitors that make their livelihood playing Blood Bowl, despite the wars going on around them (ok it is true, some teams just play the game for the love of the carnage, er I mean sport!). They are travelling entertainers, basically, and do not "represent" one faction or another. I would think a setting where Blood Bowl replaces war would make zero sense to me.
Are you perhaps implying, that the game of over the top satirical sports comedy has to make sense as a serious world (as a baseline)? Blood Bowl has never, ever, been a serious attempt at world building, but an idea that sounded awesome when the designers were drunk. Let's have a rugby game with fantasy monsters and screw it, it is somehow so popular that it is the coolest thing ever in its world! No wars or politics, just bashin' n' passin'!
It is a parody set in an alternate continuity of the Old World timeline, which is very different than the Warhammer one. Warhammer universe, yes, but an alternative version. There are humans from the Empire and there are Skaven and they play happily together, whereas in Warhammer the humans don't even believe skaven exist. The games are different entities by different authors, handling very differently from each other. Just accept the fact, which has already been established as canon by the very designers themselves.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 12:56:53
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Sherrypie wrote:It is a parody set in an alternate continuity of the Old World timeline, which is very different than the Warhammer one. Warhammer universe, yes, but an alternative version.
Well, that is not what the text says. The rulebook clearly states that it is set in the Old World. It sounds like GW changed their mind later about this, however?
Anyway, I don't personally feel that any fantasy must (or even can) make perfect sense. The idea that wars are never fought, however, seems very contradictory to the setting described in the Blood Bowl rulebook.
Edit: I realised that perhaps not everyone actually owns the rulebook, so I've quoted some relevant passages below (there are a lot more, but these seemed to address many of the questions in this thread). Note, this is not saying that the Blood Bowl setting didn't change after 1994 to become it's own thing. Emphasis added:
Back of the Blood Bowl box: wrote:“A mighty roar fills the stadium as the players take to the field! The two teams face each other: brutal, menacing Orcs versus hardened Human warriors. The starting whistle blows and the football is kicked off… The game of BLOOD BOWL has begun!
Across the length and breadth of the Warhammer World teams of armoured warriors battle to the death in great arenas. The Dwarfs in their mountain halls, Goblins in sewers, all these and more field Blood Bowl teams that play for the glory and honour of their race. Massive crowds cheer on their favorite teams and Star Players rise to fame and glory as the meanest, toughest players in the world.”
Page 39, “The Old World” wrote:“The Old World. Blood Bowl is played on a mammoth continent that is known to its inhabitants as the Old World. The Old World is a wild and dangerous place—let’s face it, it has to be if people are going to play Blood Bowl for fun! The land is bounded by the Worlds Edge Mountains to the east and by the Great Western Ocean to the west. The northern coast lies against the Sea of Claws, on the other side of which is Norsca, the home of fierce sea-fighting warriors and raiders. The southern coast lies against the Southern Sea which divides the Old World from the mysterious Southlands and the realms of Araby.
In the Old World life is often short and death sudden and unexpected. Considering the similarities between everyday life and Blood Bowl, then, it is hardly surprising that the game has proved so hugely and enduringly popular. Brought up amidst constant wars, dark forests full of horrible monsters, and the ever present reality of plague and other incurable diseases, the people of the Old World are natural Blood Bowl players, willing to risk all to win fabulous riches or fame in a world where their future is never certain.
The Old World is home to Men, Dwarfs, Elves and Halflings. These civilized folk are numerous and powerful, and their cities are large and well fortified. And they need to be, for the Old World is also home to many of the evil creatures that are their enemies: Orcs, Goblins, and the followers of Chaos in their various guises. The high mountains and deep forests are infested with many monsters, and the northern regions are so wild and dangerous they are known as the Troll Country. Away to the east lie the lands of evil and demented Chaos Dwarfs, while beyond the Troll Country lie the Northern Wastes, from where the armies of Chaos advance southwards to threaten the Old World.
The Old World also lies within striking distance of the raiding fleets of the Dark Elves of Naggaroth, who sweep through the Seas of Chaos and attack the northern coasts of the Old World, and the Undead fleets from the Land of the Dead which raid the southern and western coasts.
Considering the vast number of races that hate each other’s guts, it is hardly surprising that war between the different races is a frequent state of affairs in the Old World, while rebellions and uprisings can overturn nations and plunge them into civil war. Ancient feuds and bitter hatreds are common and run very deep. None the less, when two Blood Bowl teams arrive at a city to play a match a special truce is declared which lasts until after the match is over. This means that, no matter what the race of the team or its supporters, and barring all-out warfare, nothing will interfere with the playing of the all important game of Blood Bowl!”
Page 46, Dark Elf Blood Bowl Teams (excerpt) wrote:“Dark Elf Blood Bowl Teams. Over five thousand years ago, the High Elf kingdoms underwent a costly civil war brought about by a group of renegades known as the Dark Elves. Greedy for worldly power, the Dark Elves forsook their traditional deities to worship the darker gods of evil magic The war lasted seven centuries and resulted in the banishment of the Dark Elves from the Elf kingdoms. Embittered by their enforced exile, the Dark Elves became even more decadent and are now counted amongst the most useful of all servants of Chaos, still concentrating their considerable and malevolent power against their kin above all others.”
Death Zone, Introduction wrote:“Howdy there sports fans! Jim Johnson here, welcoming you to Death Zone, the first supplement for Blood Bowl, the game of fantasy football. And, boy, are you guys and gals in for a treat! Isn’t that right, Bob?
It sure is Jim. Because not only does Death Zone include a host of exciting new teams and Star Players for you to use, but it also includes a deck of over 100 Special Play cards that allow you to play all kinds of sneaky and underhand tricks on your opponent!
And that’s not all, Bob, because Death Zone also includes all the rules and information you need to set up your very own Blood Bowl League, just like the one run in the Warhammer Old World!
Wow, Jim. I bet tha fans can hardly wait for us to tell them about all this exciting stuff. When do we start?
Why, right now, Bob, right now…”
|
This message was edited 6 times. Last update was at 2016/05/23 13:55:11
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 13:56:01
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Dudley, UK
|
Galadrin wrote:Sherrypie wrote:It is a parody set in an alternate continuity of the Old World timeline, which is very different than the Warhammer one. Warhammer universe, yes, but an alternative version.
Well, that is based on conjecture. The rulebook clearly states that it is set in the Old World. It sounds like GW changed their mind later about this, however?
Anyway, I don't personally feel that any fantasy must (or even can) make perfect sense. The idea that wars are never fought, however, seems very contradictory to the setting described in the Blood Bowl rulebook.
I think Jervis regrets ever saying it was in the Old World. Yes at some point in the past, GW said it was set in the Old World aka Warhammer. Now they have been saying it's is in it's own universe. New game will clear this up
But it is a parody of the Warhammer World and our world (Orcidas, McMurty's, Orcland Raiders) and the facts aren't serious either
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 15:09:06
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Gaz Taylor wrote:I think Jervis regrets ever saying it was in the Old World. Yes at some point in the past, GW said it was set in the Old World aka Warhammer. Now they have been saying it's is in it's own universe. New game will clear this up
But it is a parody of the Warhammer World and our world (Orcidas, McMurty's, Orcland Raiders) and the facts aren't serious either 
Agreed! I don't know if I'll pick up the new game (I am pretty happy with what I already have), but I will definitely check it out. It's great to see GW returning to this game after so long.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/23 22:51:46
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Gun Mage
|
We have author intent on record saying that you are wrong. It's not a retcon, you just don't understand the concept of alternate continuity.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 01:15:55
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
TheWaspinator wrote:We have author intent on record saying that you are wrong. It's not a retcon, you just don't understand the concept of alternate continuity.
And you apparently do not know how to read, mate. I've tried to be helpful and post some relevant quotes above. We do not even have the author's intent on record: we have a second hand report that doesn't contain the author's actual words, just a summary of them. Regardless, JJ saying over a decade later that Blood Bowl is set in it its own world does not change the fact that this is not at all how it is presented in the 3rd Edition rulebook. I agree with Gaz; this is a case of GW changing its mind (not the first time they did that). You may feel free to pursue your interpretation, but if you want to convince me, you'll have to provide the exact words of Jervis (not some Wiki's paraphrasing) and you'll have to address the texts I quoted above. It's useless if we are not talking about actual texts here.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/05/24 01:20:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 01:23:20
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
What does it say in the first and second edition rule books?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 01:34:37
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Admit it. It would be cool as just about anything to see a face off between an Old World Denier, say fielding Stormcast Eternals, versus an Old World Confirmer fielding Orcs---but not these new designs---ones from the 1st edition, the cardstock standees.
|
Thread Slayer |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 02:07:52
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba
The Great State of New Jersey
|
Galadrin wrote: It would hardly be the Warhammer World without war, don't you think?
Exactly, thats why its an alternate dimension.
I feel like I am arguing that the Earth is round here!
More like you're arguing that the earth is flat...
So what you are saying is that Blood Bowl was absolutely set in the Old World, and over a decade after publishing the last boxed edition, Jervis said in passing at a GenCon panel discussion that he felt this was the wrong decision and that it should be otherwise?
What? How the hell did you get that? The quote literally says that the setting moved closer to the Warhammer Fantasy setting over time, implying that it absolutely never was set in the Old World, and he even goes on to say:
"the Blood Bowl world is similar to, but definitely not the same as, the Warhammer world"
Nowhere does it say or even imply this in the rulebook. In fact it says the exact opposite.
WE JUST QUOTED YOU THE GODDAMNED CREATOR OF THE GAME EXPLAINING HOW IT IS AN ALTERNATE TIMELINE.
Anyway, you do have Jervis himself admitting that the game was originally part of the Warhammer world in 3rd Edition
Again, NO.
Well, that is not what the text says. The rulebook clearly states that it is set in the Old World. It sounds like GW changed their mind later about this, however?
Anyway, I don't personally feel that any fantasy must (or even can) make perfect sense. The idea that wars are never fought, however, seems very contradictory to the setting described in the Blood Bowl rulebook.
Edit: I realised that perhaps not everyone actually owns the rulebook, so I've quoted some relevant passages below (there are a lot more, but these seemed to address many of the questions in this thread). Note, this is not saying that the Blood Bowl setting didn't change after 1994 to become it's own thing. Emphasis added:
*snip*
Harry Turtledove writes novels about how the Confederate States became Nazi's and adopted the swastika as part of the flag. You're not about to argue with me that Harry Turtledove is writing stories that happened within our timeline, are you? Yes, they are set on Earth. No, they are not set on our Earth.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/05/24 02:15:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 03:03:43
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
methebest wrote:What does it say in the first and second edition rule books?
Well, that's neither here nor there to my argument (which is just about 3rd Edition), but if I recall correctly, both 1st and 2nd made brief references to the Old World (I think it was called the "Known World" in 1986, of course). Bear in mind that the Warhammer setting developed quite a bit between 1986 and 1994). Each edition reflected aspects of the setting as it was understood at that time, but none go into such an explicit description as 3rd Edition does.
chaos0xomega wrote:Galadrin wrote: It would hardly be the Warhammer World without war, don't you think?
Exactly, thats why its an alternate dimension.
Welcome to the thread. Please read the previous posts carefully, particularly the rulebook section I quoted above which explicitly clarifies that warfare has not been "replaced" with football in the game's setting. That idea is a later invention.
chaos0xomega wrote:FFS, STOP BEING OBTUSE. WE JUST QUOTED YOU THE GODDAMNED CREATOR OF THE GAME EXPLAINING HOW IT IS AN ALTERNATE TIMELINE.
Calm down. What was provided was not a quote by Jervis, but rather was a paraphrase by an unknown Wiki editor. I have listened to the panel that supposedly has Jervis saying this and can confirm that there was no such statement at that event. This is exactly the point that I was trying to make earlier about using actual sources for one's arguments.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/24 03:07:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 07:44:13
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
First Edition does not place Bloodbowl in the Old World/Warhammer worlds merely referring to how a Ancient hidden Nuffle temple was discovered during a battle and everyone stopped to play Bloodbowl. Jim n' Bob are in there from the start. One of the expanded teams included a team of Judges and Fatties (from Judge Dredd).
I think its safe to say the game was never intended to be set in the Old World timeline but was merely a collection of tropes and races to create a diverse set of teams. Allot of the team names were in it from the start coming as they did from the Studio playtesters team names back in the 80's.
That's not to say GW didn't try to bring it closer in background in later editions, but that's just branding and product alignment. I'd imagine that it was probably also due to the constant player questions of where it was set; a question that's almost entirely inconsequential to the game.
|
How do you promote your Hobby? - Legoburner "I run some crappy wargaming website " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 11:40:00
Subject: Re:Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
@Galadrin
White Dwarf 85 (January 1987) - Blood Bowl release issue
No Warhammer setting
Case closed?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/24 11:41:20
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 11:50:07
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
That's an ad for the 1st edition—my comment was about 3rd.
If your Blood Bowl universe is different from the Warhammer world, or is an alternate take on it, then that's fine! It's your game, play it as you see fit. There is certainly room to interpret it how you would like.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/05/24 11:53:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 12:15:55
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I had the same impression like you while reading the 3rd edition rulebook. It's a thing of the past now as already mentioned by those talking to Andy Hoare for example. I'm fine with both depictions of the BB world.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 12:23:50
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Of course 3rd Edition was surpassed by two further (and soon to be another) editions.
I'm not sure why you are sticking to the relevance of a 3rd edition book that is equally outdated?
Anyone with a modicum of common sense would see the fluff in 3rd Edition as an aberration of what cam before and after (and from the writers mouth) rather than pinning his hat to it. No?
|
How do you promote your Hobby? - Legoburner "I run some crappy wargaming website " |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/24 13:01:48
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
notprop wrote:Of course 3rd Edition was surpassed by two further (and soon to be another) editions.
I'm not sure why you are sticking to the relevance of a 3rd edition book that is equally outdated?
Anyone with a modicum of common sense would see the fluff in 3rd Edition as an aberration of what cam before and after (and from the writers mouth) rather than pinning his hat to it. No?
Certainly, 3rd Edition is unique in how it depicts the setting (an aberration, as you say). It was a relic of a very particular moment in GW history, shortly after the buyout when GW was trying to consolodate its brand, strengthen its IP and make a lot of money for as little expenditure as possible (because of the cost of the buyout). GW went a little crazy on branding and started to mix everything together to make a single brand (see, for example, Talisman 3rd Edition, which has playable Night Goblin Fanatic and Witch Elf characters). For the most part, this made little sense, but was desirable for marketing reasons. It is not surprising that GW dropped this approach like a ton of bricks when they became much more stable years later and started taking their settings more "seriously."
Of course, Blood Bowl's setting is a joke—even a huge "in-joke" for those familiar with Warhammer. But early 90's Warhammer Fantasy Battle was also full of jokes. Some complain that this was just GW marketting to younger types, but I don't mind that—I was a kid in the 90's and quite loved the bright, silly aesthetics. I'm older now and I still do prefer it that way (if a grown man is going to play with little, pewter dollies, might as well lean in to the ridiculous, I say!). The Warhammer setting got a lot more serious later on, of course, which matches the "grim" feel of 1980's Warhammer much more closely (a return to form, really, and probably what most people prefer or feel is more "authentic").
Anyway, way back when this conversation started, I did not know that GW moved away from this as 3rd edition is the only edition I have ever owned.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/05/24 13:54:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/25 00:58:54
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
running amok, against the reality of defeat
|
Galadrin wrote: TheWaspinator wrote:I still think you're reading that Jervis comment waaaay wrong. It's saying that the Blood Bowl aesthetics and world got more similar to the main Warhammer world during BB 3rd edition and that that was a mistake, not that they were ever meant to be the exact same world.
Blood Bowl is a parody spinoff. It's about as much in continuity with WFB as Hostess Fruit Pie Spiderman is with normal Marvel comics. It's pretty obvious when you consider that BB claims that all war was replaced with football while WFB continued to have giant apocalyptic wars.
Yes, Blood Bowl is a parody of American football. That is very clear in the NAF name (Nuffle Amorical Footbal) and Nuffle (NFL). Yes, the Blood Bowl 3rd Edition rulebook specifically states that Blood Bowl is set in the Warhammer Old World. I can see why these two things seem contradictory: if the Old World is supposed to be a fantasy setting, how could they "break the fourth wall" and make humerous references to the real world? Doesn't that make the Old World a joke? Well, yes it does. A good part of the Old World is meant to be a partly tongue-in-cheek reference to a very British and very humorous interpretation of the real world and its history. In the 90's, GW had a goofy sense of humour baked right into the setting. Warhammer was NOT a grimdark, serious setting, but a funny and vibrant setting, where Karl Franz was an uplifting statesman (compare to KF in 3rd Edition) and Teensy-Weensy's (ahem, "Tichi-Huichi's") Raiders were the scourge of the battlefield. It was the era before the square-jawed, "gorilla" style Orcs (rather, it was a time when Orcs were sculpted by Kev Adams and each one had a big, stupid grin). But notice, you were not bothered by the famous Estalian discoverer of the New World, "Marco Colombo," or the adventures of Lost Losterikson. Why? Are not these clear parodies? To say anything other that they are would be to obviously "miss" the joke.
So you are absolutely correct. I am implying that the Warhammer World was not a "serious" setting. I am also saying that the 3rd Edition Blood Bowl rulebook is 100% crystal clear, dried ink on paper, that 3rd Edition Blood Bowl is set in the Warhammer world. Not a parody of it (since the whole thing is already a parody from the start) and not an "alternate dimension." My point is that Blood Bowl parodies American Football. It does NOT parody the Warhammer universe. Those kind of jokes are riven throughout the setting. They are part of the game, just like Squig Hoppers, the Skaven Doomwheel, Pavane of Slaanesh and the Halfling Hot Pot.
Later on, it seems about 13 years later (2005), GW changed their mind on this. I hadn't heard about this, since it is not mentioned in any Blood Bowl rulebook or supplement, but it is not surprising. GW had been changing for years, ever since about 2000, and the Warhammer setting was becoming "grimdark" (in an attempt to recapture what it had been in the 80's, but with a much more clear and defined form). My argument is only that 3rd Edition was much less serious (and, in my personal opinion, much more fun because of it).
Edit: By the way, Blood Bowl 3rd Edition does NOT claim that "war was replaced by football." Read the chapter on the Old World and the Origins of Blood Bowl again and you can see that it directly refutes such a notion.
Edit 2: By the way, why is Blood Bowl imagined to be so "unrealistic"? Surely the Romans began the practice of importing "exotic" foreign athletes from distant lands to compete in all manner of bloodsports in the colliseum (not just gladiator battles, but wrestling, racing, team-based naval skirmishes and so on). Check out the violent sport of Harpastum, for example. Blood Bowl is much more clearly a reference to Medieval football, however— just check out the description. It was a sport "involving an unlimited number of players on opposing teams, who would clash in a heaving mass of people struggling to drag an inflated pig's bladder by any means possible to markers at each end of a town. By some accounts, in some such events any means could be used to move the ball towards the goal, as long as it did not lead to manslaughter or murder" (Wiki). That means you could maim, beat, stomp and dogpile whoever you wanted to get at victory. That was a real sport. Are you suggesting that if medieval Britain had that, the Old World wouldn't (or would have something much tamer)?
So you just want to argue your point?
|
come join us
greg graffin |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/25 06:08:48
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Galadrin wrote:That's an ad for the 1st edition—my comment was about 3rd.
If your Blood Bowl universe is different from the Warhammer world, or is an alternate take on it, then that's fine! It's your game, play it as you see fit. There is certainly room to interpret it how you would like.
I think what you meant to say was "I'm wrong". You are literally the only person arguing that it was set in the traditional Warhammer world. If YOUR Blood Bowl universe is different from everyone elses, then more power to you. If you want, you can have Sigmar riding a My Little Pony crapping out golden Blood Bowl balls while naked Halfling cheerleaders clap him on. Facts would confirm otherwise however.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/05/25 06:26:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/25 06:30:08
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Gun Mage
|
tyrannosaurus wrote:Galadrin wrote:That's an ad for the 1st edition—my comment was about 3rd.
If your Blood Bowl universe is different from the Warhammer world, or is an alternate take on it, then that's fine! It's your game, play it as you see fit. There is certainly room to interpret it how you would like.
I think what you meant to say was "I'm wrong". You are literally the only person arguing that it was set in the traditional Warhammer world. If YOUR Blood Bowl universe is different from everyone elses, then more power to you. Facts would confirm otherwise however.
He seems to have latched onto some single lines in Blood Bowl that say "the Warhammer world" and is acting like that has more weight than all of the weird stuff about the Blood Bowl setting that leads to the conclusion that it is not canon to the main setting, like the previously-mentioned "Nagash watching Cabalvision". When the spin-off doesn't fit the original setting, most people naturally conclude that the spin-off is its own separate thing. He's either trolling, trying to force his fan canon as official, or just unable to read context. In any case, we should probably just let this topic die.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/05/25 06:32:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/25 06:55:02
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
TheWaspinator wrote: tyrannosaurus wrote:Galadrin wrote:That's an ad for the 1st edition—my comment was about 3rd.
If your Blood Bowl universe is different from the Warhammer world, or is an alternate take on it, then that's fine! It's your game, play it as you see fit. There is certainly room to interpret it how you would like.
I think what you meant to say was "I'm wrong". You are literally the only person arguing that it was set in the traditional Warhammer world. If YOUR Blood Bowl universe is different from everyone elses, then more power to you. Facts would confirm otherwise however.
He seems to have latched onto some single lines in Blood Bowl that say "the Warhammer world" and is acting like that has more weight than all of the weird stuff about the Blood Bowl setting that leads to the conclusion that it is not canon to the main setting, like the previously-mentioned "Nagash watching Cabalvision". When the spin-off doesn't fit the original setting, most people naturally conclude that the spin-off is its own separate thing. He's either trolling, trying to force his fan canon as official, or just unable to read context. In any case, we should probably just let this topic die.
Ok. I'm off to the 40K forums to try to convince them that the Emperor is alive and kicking and living in Luton.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/05/25 09:37:07
Subject: Upcoming Blood Bowl - Old World setting?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
@whomever, nah boys, I am just trying to point out that Blood Bowl 3e explicitly states in two entire chapters of the Blood Bowl rulebook that it is set in the Warhammer world. If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, holds up a huge freaking sign that says "yes, I am indeed a duck!" then it is indeed a duck. If you don't think cabalvision or other BB sillyness could "fit" Warhammer, then that is fine, but it's not so much an argument as it is a preference. The 90's Warhammer world was an extremely silly place, but that was so very clearly before your time, so you don't "get it," just like I am sure you don't "get" a world before the internet when you couldn't just log on to a forum and bang your head against a keyboard for 30 minutes and call it an argument, lie about what Jervis Johnson said and claim that the backcopy of a Black Library novel written by some unknown editor over a decade later overrules the actual, literal words written in the actual, literal official rulebook of the game you so clearly do not understand.
Anyway, I am tired of arguing the obvious. Have fun bashing your heads against the keyboard lads.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2016/05/25 09:42:04
|
|
 |
 |
|