Switch Theme:

What would be the best way to get started?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Focused Fire Warrior





England

As some of you may infer from the question, I could be starting AoS soon. What I would like to know is what is the best way to get started, both games-wise and army-wise?

Novels:
The Pirate Throne - 272 Pages
An Empire Broken - 229 Pages

Current Writing Project:
The Circus of the Devil

Short Stories:
The Skulls in the Well 
   
Made in ca
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer





British Columbia

If either of the armies in the starter interest you, buying a set and trading away the other side to double up is a great start.

 BlaxicanX wrote:
A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.


 
   
Made in us
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker





Pittsburgh, PA

Depends on what you're interested in. The get started boxs are some pretty good deals, and they have some box sets like the Slaves to Darkness or the Flesh-Eater Courts sets that are great deals. I got the Flesh Eaters box set for 145 on eBay, and it comes with enough stuff to build at least one of every unit they have. That's 6 kits at a huge discount.
   
Made in gb
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM





I would look at all the discount boxes (including the starter and the Start Collecting boxes) and choose an army to play from those.

Buy the box. Buy the general's handbook - away you go! Open, Narrative or Matched. Whatever you want to do.

Bye bye Dakkadakka, happy hobbying! I really enjoyed my time on here. Opinions were always my own :-) 
   
Made in kr
Regular Dakkanaut




Los Angeles

To start collecting an AoS army I would look at the Start Collecting boxes. Who would have known.
   
Made in us
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos






I picked up the Khorne half of the starter set from my FLGS's "bits box" for $60. Now I'm looking to get the Start Collecting Slave to Darkness and I'm hoping to find Lord Heldrath's Chaos Deathtide (seems to be completely out of production. If anyone has a link to where I can buy one, preferably US to avoid excess shipping fees, that would be freaking great!).

2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
 
   
Made in us
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant





Illinois

the getting started boxes or the large army boxes are a great place to start with virtually any army. If its available for the army you want

RoperPG wrote:
Blimey, it's very salty in here...
Any more vegans want to put forth their opinions on bacon?
 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 d00mspire wrote:
As some of you may infer from the question, I could be starting AoS soon. What I would like to know is what is the best way to get started, both games-wise and army-wise?


First off, what interests you? Once we find out what interests you we can tell you what to get. If you like Stormcast Eternals (sigmarines if you don't know what a Stormcast Eternal is) and the Chaos dudes, then get the AoS starter set. If they don't interest you, there is quite a few "Get Started" boxes out now with 3 more coming out in 2 weeks I think. Those would be a great way to get into AoS. And they are great savings.

For example, the Sephron, the Lizard dudes. Just to buy the dinosaur thingy (yeah sadly I keep forgetting the names) is a $100 Canadian. Now you can get the Dinosaur with 2 sets of troops for a $100 if you buy the get started box. Storm Cast Eteranals are going to get a new box set. Thing is, if you like the chaos ones as well you might want to get the Starter set first since you can have two armies. If not, then get what interests you.

Second what is your play style? If you don't have something that interests you, what is your play style? Are you a shooty person or assaulty person? Maybe you want a horde army or a small elite army.

Once we know this we can really help you in what to start looking at to see if that interests you or not.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in gb
Focused Fire Warrior





England

Davor wrote:
 d00mspire wrote:
As some of you may infer from the question, I could be starting AoS soon. What I would like to know is what is the best way to get started, both games-wise and army-wise?


First off, what interests you?


Possibly the Deathlords, the Flesh Eater Courts, or Slaves into Darkness. They seem to have interesting rules and interesting fluff. Personally, I like the models of the Flesh Eater Courts, but to my knowledge there isn't a Get Started box for them. I do know I would have to by the Death book.

Novels:
The Pirate Throne - 272 Pages
An Empire Broken - 229 Pages

Current Writing Project:
The Circus of the Devil

Short Stories:
The Skulls in the Well 
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

 d00mspire wrote:
.Personally, I like the models of the Flesh Eater Courts, but to my knowledge there isn't a Get Started box for them.

Its coming next week.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 d00mspire wrote:
I like the models of the Flesh Eater Courts, but to my knowledge there isn't a Get Started box for them. I do know I would have to by the Death book.


That is why I asked. There are I believe 6 new Get Started boxes being released so wasn't sure if one of some of those 6 would interest you. Now I want to start what you are. It just looks so freaking awesome.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in au
Bounding Assault Marine





Australia

 Ghaz wrote:
 d00mspire wrote:
.Personally, I like the models of the Flesh Eater Courts, but to my knowledge there isn't a Get Started box for them.

Its coming next week.


Thank you for dropping that link, I wondered what was up next

OP , I agree with what was said before. You need to let people know what style you are after, not so much the armies but what qualities in armies you look for and what it is you'd like to do with the army (Stand back and shoot, charge in, mixed bag, loads of special rules etc ).

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/07/22 13:07:51


 
   
Made in gb
Focused Fire Warrior





England

 Soldier0Fortune wrote:

OP , I agree with what was said before. You need to let people know what style you are after, not so much the armies but what qualities in armies you look for and what it is you'd like to do with the army (Stand back and shoot, charge in, mixed bag, loads of special rules etc ).


The style I'm after is close combat orientated, maybe some support in the form of huge monsters that can inflict heavy damage and take a lot of wounds before dying. All in all, I want to play an army whose style is opposite to that of the Tau, as I play them in 40K, and would like a change of play style.

Novels:
The Pirate Throne - 272 Pages
An Empire Broken - 229 Pages

Current Writing Project:
The Circus of the Devil

Short Stories:
The Skulls in the Well 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard




 d00mspire wrote:
 Soldier0Fortune wrote:

OP , I agree with what was said before. You need to let people know what style you are after, not so much the armies but what qualities in armies you look for and what it is you'd like to do with the army (Stand back and shoot, charge in, mixed bag, loads of special rules etc ).


The style I'm after is close combat orientated, maybe some support in the form of huge monsters that can inflict heavy damage and take a lot of wounds before dying. All in all, I want to play an army whose style is opposite to that of the Tau, as I play them in 40K, and would like a change of play style.


Well, you came to the right place. With the exception of a couple armies (Tzeentch Daemons, Empire, certain Wanderer builds), no army can really be built pure ranged, and most armies don't have more than one or two good ranged options.

Combat comes in many forms. How many models do you want to paint, a lot or a little? Do you like mounted stuff? What aesthetic jumps out at you?

AoS is still in the infancy. There's not so much a "best" combat army at the moment, and many seem to be good. Destruction is one of the best at just running forward and hurting things, especially Ogres and Ironjawz. But, pick an army that you like stylistically before you do anything else imo.
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 d00mspire wrote:
 Soldier0Fortune wrote:

OP , I agree with what was said before. You need to let people know what style you are after, not so much the armies but what qualities in armies you look for and what it is you'd like to do with the army (Stand back and shoot, charge in, mixed bag, loads of special rules etc ).


The style I'm after is close combat orientated, maybe some support in the form of huge monsters that can inflict heavy damage and take a lot of wounds before dying. All in all, I want to play an army whose style is opposite to that of the Tau, as I play them in 40K, and would like a change of play style.


How about Orruks? Awesome centre piece monster.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in gb
Focused Fire Warrior





England

Davor wrote:

How about Orruks? Awesome centre piece monster.


The Orruks are pretty cool models, and the Maw-Krusha is awesome. However, I'm beginning to lean towards Flesh-Eater Courts or Everchosen Chaos/Slaves Into Darkness.

Novels:
The Pirate Throne - 272 Pages
An Empire Broken - 229 Pages

Current Writing Project:
The Circus of the Devil

Short Stories:
The Skulls in the Well 
   
Made in ca
Fixture of Dakka




 d00mspire wrote:
Davor wrote:

How about Orruks? Awesome centre piece monster.


The Orruks are pretty cool models, and the Maw-Krusha is awesome. However, I'm beginning to lean towards Flesh-Eater Courts or Everchosen Chaos/Slaves Into Darkness.


That's great. You can do both right? Start one, then work on the other, or work on both slowly.

Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.

Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?

Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".  
   
Made in gb
Focused Fire Warrior





England

Davor wrote:

That's great. You can do both right? Start one, then work on the other, or work on both slowly.


I could do that.

Novels:
The Pirate Throne - 272 Pages
An Empire Broken - 229 Pages

Current Writing Project:
The Circus of the Devil

Short Stories:
The Skulls in the Well 
   
Made in us
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant





Illinois

if you want slaves to darkness I have a bunch of chaos stuff im willing to unload

RoperPG wrote:
Blimey, it's very salty in here...
Any more vegans want to put forth their opinions on bacon?
 
   
 
Forum Index » Warhammer: Age of Sigmar
Go to: