Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/02 23:51:46
Subject: Re:Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
decker_cky wrote:pm713 wrote: casvalremdeikun wrote:To be honest, Ward was actually a pretty good rules writer. His codexes had excellent internal Balance (at least relative to the current ones) and weren't too far off from each other in terms of external balance. Keep him away from the fluff and let him write the rules and things will actually be pretty good.
Didn't he make ridiculously OP GK, and ruin 7th Fantasy with Daemons? Plus the High Elves book. He is not good at rules.
High Elves was Adam Troke.
Ward got better at writing rules and fluff writing as he got more experience. I seem to remember him getting a lot of positive feedback for his work on Lord of the Rings stuff.
But if he's being brought back as a consultant, I doubt he's doing the same work as he was doing when he was part of the development team.
I'm sure it was Matt Ward.
|
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 00:27:43
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
The High Elves book says Written By Mat Ward.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 00:29:43
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Bottle wrote:I think he's going to be the main plot writer for the AoSification of 40k
Oh Bottle you bad boy. You trying to start something?
oni wrote:Calm down everyone. He's not back at GW, he's just writing a novel for Black Library.
You have proof of this or just guessing?
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 00:36:20
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
Truly we are now living in the End of Times, woe be unto us all.
EDIT: Seriously though, what's Ward going to do, write something ridiculously OTT and tonally inconsistent with the setting? Welcome to 90% of modern GW's output.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/08/03 00:38:25
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 00:37:10
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Love this.
Dude is an idiot.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 01:31:54
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Ultramarine Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Davor wrote:
oni wrote:Calm down everyone. He's not back at GW, he's just writing a novel for Black Library.
You have proof of this or just guessing?
No proof, simple logic can figure it out. Matt said GW is a new "client". So he's not a GW employee, he's simply been contracted by them to do something. Typically GW contracts BL writers. GW is not going to contract someone to write a codex or a rulebook.
Although,he could be play testing. I'm not sure how GW goes about that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 01:43:12
Subject: Re:Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
despite the flack people gave matt ward, ward was a very consistent rules writer. A Ward Codex was always balenced agiest the other Ward Codexs.
Lord of the Rings was good because he had more control over all the armies involved when balancing them. The issue in 40k was that Ward was just never on the same page as everyone eals when writing rules.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 01:49:22
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
oni wrote:Davor wrote:
oni wrote:Calm down everyone. He's not back at GW, he's just writing a novel for Black Library.
You have proof of this or just guessing?
No proof, simple logic can figure it out. Matt said GW is a new "client". So he's not a GW employee, he's simply been contracted by them to do something. Typically GW contracts BL writers. GW is not going to contract someone to write a codex or a rulebook.
Although,he could be play testing. I'm not sure how GW goes about that.
That was my guess as well but I didn't think Matt War ever wrote a Black Library novel so didn't think it would happen. GW also contracts out artwork now, but I don't think Matt Ward is an artist that way. Who knows, seeing how some of the art is horrible maybe he would make better art  .
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 01:51:08
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
I wonder if he'll carve his own initials into the rib plate of the space marine statue they unceremoniously moved to under the staircase...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 02:00:52
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
If it is a book, will it be that the emperor finally dies, his warp self explodes into existence, destroying the universe were only a few realms survive, so starts the age of the Emperor
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 02:03:00
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Knowing him, Rowboat Girlyman awakens from Stasis, sees the condition of the Imperium and deems the Emperor a failure. Then he kills the emperor and uses his status as the last non-corrupted Primarch to become the new Emperor. Then everyone bows to him due to his unmatched intelligence and he earns the alliegence of every space marine chapter in existence because of this. Then he sends the Ultramarines into the warp to finally defeat Chaos.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 02:03:41
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
GoonBandito wrote:gungo wrote:At the end of the current warzone fenris campaign draigo has his illusionary mask ripped off by azreal and reveals he was Magnus all along. Magnus then shouts " and I would have gotten away with it to if it wasn't for you meddling dark Angels and that stupid dog" (in reference to leman Russ).
- Matt ward
I'd read that to be honest
No need to read this you can catch it on nick at night with scooby doo reruns.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 02:48:27
Subject: Re:Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Perturbed Blood Angel Tactical Marine
|
Well my only concern is the fluff matter. It's not good.
But his rules are quite intresting and really fun.
And whe you remember that GK broke the whole meta - think about current eldar.
I can't even put a nice word of how broken 7th eldar is.
So it was the Angels of death that toned it down a little bit... but at what price? being the most broken ever - 2++ rerollable with 2+ FNP eternal warrior charging anywhere on first turn riding ruin centurions - wtf?
So power creep does not depend on Ward.
And if you dare to compare with current BA/GK/DE/Necrons codicies to what was in 5th edition - it's just two completly different levels.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 03:56:04
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
A lot of no in here. I think we need a Daniel Bryan YES YES YES. It's not the same when he left..
Please please please do the Tyranid codex.i guess Geanstealers would be too Lars eh?
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 04:17:03
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
His books were way more interesting than the current crop of copy/paste codexes with cartoon artwork.
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 04:38:49
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
|
Are the GKs in line for a new codex update? Guess GW needs to butcher more Sisters to protect the GKs from some taint or another.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 06:51:04
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
New client? How about an old client?
Poor guy can't even write a good tweet.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 07:21:53
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Probably just some novels.
Man now I want a book by him called 'Dragio, Interrupted'.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 07:43:56
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
He will write upp new fluff revealing that Draigo is one of the two lost primarchs and has returned to take the place of the God Emperor and whipe chaos out forever. Duh..
Friggin Mat Ward..
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 07:48:11
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Alluring Sorcerer of Slaanesh
|
Truly the End Times are upon us
|
No pity, no remorse, no shoes |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 07:49:24
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
gak. Why the feth have they brought him back? He's terrible.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 07:58:12
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Novice Knight Errant Pilot
|
Yup. Couldn't say it better myself.
|
"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 08:03:33
Subject: Re:Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
I think his Necron Codex was about the only decent thing he put out there.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 09:20:08
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
oni wrote:Calm down everyone. He's not back at GW, he's just writing a novel for Black Library.
Seems the most likely.
Which I'm happy about.
Read one of his novels, some of his shorts and his other novel is in the post.
I think he'd be a good fit for BL.
Kirasu wrote:His books were way more interesting than the current crop of copy/paste codexes with cartoon artwork.
I certainly liked the way there were viable different builds with his books.
TBF the introduction of the formations has altered things a lot here but seems to me you used to see/get a lot more variety on the tabletop than you get now.
And as others have said it wasn't all done by him and was all approved by others along the way.
He's a nice guy too
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 09:49:32
Subject: Re:Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Courageous Grand Master
-
|
In the interests of balance, I'll say the following points in Ward's defence:
1) Alan Merrit  The chapterhouse court case revealed a lot of what really happened behind the scenes at GW, so if you're working for somebody like that, it's not always your fault.
2) The models drove the rules, and not vice versa. We know from numerous Rick Priestly interviews that the studio ended up as a marketing wing for the company, and in many cases new army books emerged because a particular designer felt the need to develop a new monster or tank or whatever, often ignoring the fact that Army X was long overdue for a new codex...
So, if you're Mat Ward, sitting at your desk, and somebody comes up and dumps a whole load of stuff in front of you and says we need rules for X Y Z, you may not have the time to develop that great idea you had for a new Brettonian army book.
3) The LOTR stuff was good, and I though his Daemon army book was great fun to play with and against...
All in all, I don't think he merits a lot of the flak that came his way, and was too often used as a punchbag for those who had gripes with GW.
|
"Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky. But is it true?" - Tom Kirby, CEO, Games Workshop Ltd |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 09:56:25
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Yeah but Draigo. And Nemesis DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM Fists.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 10:02:30
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness
|
Quarterdime wrote:New client? How about an old client?
Poor guy can't even write a good tweet.
It's almost as if referring to them as a new client is the entire joke! Who'd have thunk it?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 10:23:24
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Scouting Shade
|
I never understood the hate for Mat Ward. His Necrons codex was my first Warhammer 40K Codex since the 4th edition Imperial Guard one, and, regarding balance and fluff, I always found the Cruddace ones to be much worse.
Plus, remember his first job was to write rules for LOTR, which was quite biased towards heroes. After that he was put to work on Space Marines, which are the "Heroes of Heroes" in 40K. Then Grey Knights, which are the "Heroes of Heroes of Heroes".
Can't blame the guy if he had to go overboard with the fluff. Plus, I loved the Iyanden supplement, and the fluff of the Necron Codex.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 10:32:33
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Good if he joins them again, he might actually help fix the crappy mess 40k has become.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/08/03 10:35:06
Subject: Mat Ward back at GW?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
n0t_u wrote:Good if he joins them again, he might actually help fix the crappy mess 40k has become.
I find this amusing as he helped make it that way lol.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|