Poll |
 |
The new Guilliman model, do you like it? |
Yes. |
 
|
39% |
[ 142 ] |
No. |
 
|
50% |
[ 185 ] |
I don't know/other. |
 
|
11% |
[ 40 ] |
Total Votes : 367 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 09:05:29
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
Ireland
|
I am holding off until I see how it stands beside other Primarch models, namely the 30K version.
That version earlier in the thread with a bunch of the detailing removed from it improved the model a lot.
My biggest problem is to get the new Cypher you'd have to get him and Boringstance McGreyknight.
|
Stepping Between Games - www.steppingbetweengames.com |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 10:24:23
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Agile Revenant Titan
|
Thousandeyes wrote:My biggest problem is to get the new Cypher you'd have to get him and Boringstance McGreyknight.
If you're lucky you might be able to snag him from a bits site on his own before he sells out...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 14:29:14
Subject: Re:Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
kingbobbito wrote: jreilly89 wrote: kingbobbito wrote:Commissar Benny wrote:The best model to come out in recent years is hands down Cannoness Veridyan. I don't know who worked on her, but they knew what they were doing. Hopefully we'll see more from said designer/artist.
I personally don't like her. I get that they're going for an old school 40k look, but the high heels look absolutely idiotic and the pose just seems so... unnatural. Lose the heels and lower the leg a bit and it'd be a nice model.
I wish they'd either update the SoB line entirely or scrap it. The old sculpts are dumb looking
What did you think of Celestine? I do like her new model.
I like her new model, I just wish they'd move away from the "Bob" haircuts.
|
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 14:54:17
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
I'd be happier with the bob haircuts if they weren't always so freshly-trimmed and clean. Remember the 'sample Battle Sister' page in the 3e Witch Hunters book with the labels for all of the equipment and that same bob haircut sticking up every which way like it hadn't seen a comb in months of constant battle? Why can't we have models that look like that?
(The standard Battle Sister torso definitely needs a redesign (though my complaint is mostly that it looks like they've decided to use some sort of flexible material for the lower portion, and it doesn't really make intuitive sense to me as armour), but Celestine took almost all of my concerns about the rest of the Sisters' aesthetic and addressed them quite neatly. Though I do need to find her a sword that doesn't have a spray of roses coming off the handle, that bit just looks like she's in a Final Fantasy game. Which would be cool, except that she's in my Inquisition army, most of which would look silly in a Final Fantasy game.)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 17:01:38
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I voted Don't Know. At first I thought it was hideous on first time I saw it. But like other GW minis, the first look is always horrible lately, but sometimes grow on you.
After seeing it from a different angle it's not as bad as I first saw it. I agree the "swirly" parts need to go. Someone did a photoshop to make it look like the Emperor. I think if I can get my hands on him, that is what I will do. Looked pretty ok in gold with long black hair for the Emperor.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 17:05:07
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Water-Caste Negotiator
|
Don't want to be Mr Controversial, but I kinda like the new Guilliman model. It looks like a nice model to build, paint and display, although I get the thoughts on the other side of the table as well
|
"Good men mean well, we just don’t always end up doing well." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 17:59:41
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Nasty Nob
Crescent City Fl..
|
I like it. Got me excited to work on my First Legion models again. Hopeful for the Lion and Luther. 30K/40K rules and models after seeing Guilliman.
|
The rewards of tolerance are treachery and betrayal.
Remember kids, Games Workshop needs you more than you need them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 20:51:08
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
The new Guilliman model might be not be making Guilliman as tall and skinny as people seem to think. Looks to me like a normal sized Astartes with extended prosthetic hands and feet. If he has the same neural contacts as regular Astartes, then he could maneuver and function fine with such extensions. We know the armor was crafted by Cawl, what we don't know is the extent of Guilliman's injuries. Could he be paralyzed by the poison, and the new armor is effectively life support and wheelchair in one?
Could he be an imposter?
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/03 20:55:32
Subject: Re:Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Basecoated Black
|
Its a miss for me. Think he looks like joffrey from game of thrones.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/05 16:17:24
Subject: Re:Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
i thnk it looks awesome
Automatically Appended Next Post:
I will say, and usually the GW stuff is amazing, i think he would have look better on their paint job with brown or black hair. Too light blonde with the light skin and the wreath thing. Needed some darker color in the wreathe and hair. But the model is great. could be the white background accentuating this.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/03/05 16:37:24
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/05 17:24:32
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
Far too busy fr my liking.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/06 16:39:58
Subject: Guilliman model, hit or miss?
|
 |
Water-Caste Negotiator
|
It's okay. Better with the helmet on. Overall, I feel as though his armour is a little over-wrought. I prefer the Forgeworld imagining.
|
|
 |
 |
|