Switch Theme:

Quicken and falling back  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Purged Thrall





FL

Would using quicken on a unit allow it to fall back (as if it were the movement phase)?
   
Made in us
Never Forget Isstvan!







Falling back is just a move so yes quicken should let you fall back.

Since they could have fallen back before the psychic phase anyway, im not sure why you would ever have this come up though.

JOIN MY CRUSADE and gain 4000 RT points!
http://www.eternalcrusade.com/account/sign-up/?ref_code=EC-PLCIKYCABW8PG 
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






 novaspike wrote:
Would using quicken on a unit allow it to fall back (as if it were the movement phase)?
Yes. Falling Back is the only legal movement they could make (if they were within 1" of an enemy).
   
Made in nz
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




Ankh Morpork

 BaconCatBug wrote:
Yes. Falling Back is the only legal movement they could make (if they were within 1" of an enemy).


I take it you've changed your mind on the application of "as if"?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/02/07 19:22:26


 
   
Made in us
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon






 Mr. Shine wrote:
 BaconCatBug wrote:
Yes. Falling Back is the only legal movement they could make (if they were within 1" of an enemy).


I take it you've changed your mind on the application of "as if"?
No, BCB is right - "As if" is clearly different from"Is".

However, "As if it were" is semantically same thing as "is".

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/02/07 19:53:39


 
   
Made in nz
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




Ankh Morpork

 skchsan wrote:
No, BCB is right - "As if" is clearly different from"Is".

However, "As if it were" is semantically same thing as "is".


Yes, but both here and the Auspex Scan thread I'm making reference to are situations where, "as if it were" are used, and he's given conflicting responses.

I know BCB's claimed people are always trying to catch him out etc. which I'm certainly not trying to do with any malice, simply pointing out with some good-natured humour that it seems he's changed his view.
   
Made in se
Swift Swooping Hawk





 Eihnlazer wrote:
Since they could have fallen back before the psychic phase anyway, im not sure why you would ever have this come up though.

You're in close combat with Wyches and failed to fall back in the movement phase, and you really want to fall back?

Craftworld Sciatháin 4180 pts  
   
Made in gb
Been Around the Block




 Eihnlazer wrote:

Since they could have fallen back before the psychic phase anyway, im not sure why you would ever have this come up though.


Leaving a unit of engaged with an enemy to prevent Auspex Scan or Forewarned stratagem fire from that unit but then wanting to be out of combat to allow you to shoot said enemy unit and/or charge them with something else.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: