Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 02:07:12
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Ultramarine Scout with Sniper Rifle
Seattle
|
The title says it all. Just wondering if I’m missing something.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 02:32:35
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Nasty Nob
|
You can spam flamers
|
ERJAK wrote:
The fluff is like ketchup and mustard on a burger. Yes it's desirable, yes it makes things better, but no it doesn't fundamentally change what you're eating and no you shouldn't just drown the whole meal in it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 02:52:04
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Bounding Ultramarine Assault Trooper
|
They are a tac squad with two flamers in fast attack and you can buy them jet packs.
|
Ultramarine 6000 : Imperial Knights 1700 : Grey Knights 1000 : Ad mech 500 :Nids 4000 : Necrons 500 : Death watch 500 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 03:33:17
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Huge Hierodule
|
BigErn wrote:The title says it all. Just wondering if I’m missing something.
Nope, +10pts for +1 atk per base.
|
was censored by the ministry of truth |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 04:03:24
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yeah you pretty much never would want to use assault Marines. Maybe as BA since they get some extra weapon options... But even then there are better choices.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 09:59:23
Subject: Re:Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
|
They can take melt bombs
|
Brutal, but kunning! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 10:02:52
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
I kina want a vanguard squad of just all jetpack claws! Looks cool and might shred up the odd T3 infantry.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 14:26:21
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Cog in the Machine
Washington, DC
|
lolman1c wrote:I kina want a vanguard squad of just all jetpack claws! Looks cool and might shred up the odd T3 infantry.
As someone that plays VV heavy Raven Guard, Dual Lightning Claw vets can be OK if you have a ton of LOS blocking terrain or they get thier deepstrike charge off, but they tend to just get shredded by any sort of shooting. I rarely get my points back. They are fun with Shrike because you can 'turn-off' overwatch, and get reroll charge reroll hits and reroll to wound. Make sure to pay for melta bombs - claws do what they do well, but against anything T5+ they start to get a lot weaker.
I would also suggest mixing in a few Storm Shields so you can at least have an invuln if you need it.
They need to make assault marines troops IMO. Even then I am not sure I would use them over scouts, but at least I would have a reason to possibly include them.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/04/10 14:27:56
#dontbeatony
3500+
(Raven Guard) 7000+
(Scions) 1500+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 14:43:34
Subject: Re:Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 16:03:55
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Fluff
Or you really *really* need 10 pts but aren't otherwise optimizing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 17:00:40
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
And +1LD, which makes them basically immune to Battleshock. Assuming all but 1 die of course but still. They run better in a larger group.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 18:00:46
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
What you really use assualt marines for, is adding a basic mortal wound/0AP weapons chump to take the first death, with chainsword bolt pistol.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/04/10 18:01:36
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/06 20:23:51
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Ice_can wrote:What you really use assualt marines for, is adding a basic mortal wound/0AP weapons chump to take the first death, with chainsword bolt pistol.
But Vanguard aren't much more expensive to do that, and you can have a cheap one or two with just Chainswords.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 19:38:27
Subject: Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:Ice_can wrote:What you really use assualt marines for, is adding a basic mortal wound/0AP weapons chump to take the first death, with chainsword bolt pistol.
But Vanguard aren't much more expensive to do that, and you can have a cheap one or two with just Chainswords.
I ment you split your old assualtmarine squad models with the basic weapons and tack one or two of them into the special weapon carrying vanguard vets, to sponge up the MW or overwatch before your special weapon carrying vanguard vets die.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/04/10 19:39:10
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/04/10 19:40:21
Subject: Re:Why should I ever choose Assault Squads over Vetran Vanguards?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
PA Unitied States
|
Deleted
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/04/10 19:47:56
22 yrs in the hobby
:Eldar: 10K+ pts, 2500 pts
1850 pts
Vampire Counts 4000+ |
|
 |
 |
|