| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/20 12:09:59
Subject: GSC and including AM units. Have I read it wrong?
|
 |
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern
|
How do!
Sorry I can't provide exact wording, as I'm at work and my book is at home.
But there was a comment in one of my other threads which made me stop and question my understanding of how AM Brood Brothers can be worked into a GSC army.
From memory, the first part of the rule explains that we can include AM units in a GSC army, without losing Creed benefits. So far, so good. The next bits explain that we can only have one AM detachment for every GSC detachment.
Now, my take on that is that if I want to ally in AM units as Brood Brothers, they need to be added a separate Detachment in my army. I can't simply add say, three Manticores as Heavy Support to a GSC Batallion Detachment. But the comment challenged that perception - and suggested we can indeed just add AM units to a GSC Detachment.
For clarity, this is an open question. I've no particular horse in this race, as my current army involves an AM Detachment anyway. I'm just looking to check if I've misread things or not.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/20 12:13:51
Subject: Re:GSC and including AM units. Have I read it wrong?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
You're right. The wording is:
So there are Brood Brother units from the GSC book, and separate AM Brood Brother allies.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/20 12:31:16
Subject: GSC and including AM units. Have I read it wrong?
|
 |
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern
|
Pretty much what I thought.
But I can see why some thing it's ambiguous without the next paragraph that explains how we can include AM units, as that solely mentions additional detachments.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/20 13:00:15
Subject: GSC and including AM units. Have I read it wrong?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Pretty much what I thought.
But I can see why some thing it's ambiguous without the next paragraph that explains how we can include AM units, as that solely mentions additional detachments.
I wish they hadn't overloaded Brood Brothers like that. It's used for a GSC unit, a keyword shared by some GSCs units and some AM units under certain conditions, and a detachment of said AM units.
Could have been done way more clearly.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/20 13:02:40
Subject: GSC and including AM units. Have I read it wrong?
|
 |
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern
|
I don't really get why 'codex native' stuff is Brood Brother.
See, in the olden days, Brood Brothers weren't Hybrids, just Cult Devotees (humans infected by the kiss).
But hey, I'm only taking a few AM bits, so not something I especially need to think about.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/20 13:35:01
Subject: GSC and including AM units. Have I read it wrong?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:I don't really get why 'codex native' stuff is Brood Brother.
See, in the olden days, Brood Brothers weren't Hybrids, just Cult Devotees (humans infected by the kiss).
But hey, I'm only taking a few AM bits, so not something I especially need to think about.
Agreed. They should have kept the term Brood Brothers separate from any units in GSC detachments to avoid confusion.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|