Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:04:53
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Version A: https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/40K_8th_ed_Update_Codex_Genestealer_Cults_ver_1.0.pdf Version B: https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/warhammer_40000_genestealer_cults_en.pdf So, GW, which one is correct? How can you be so incompetent to once again fail at basic proofreading or playtesting as to continue your 0% success rate with rulebooks, but also release two FAQs, with the same version number WITH DIFFERENT NERFS??!?!? Why did you nerf Mind Control in one, nerf Mental Onslaught in the other but not both??? More importantly, why release two FAQs with the SAME VERSION NUMBER. If you wanted to change the FAQ and nerfs, FINE, but number them correctly so we know which one is correct.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:14:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:18:14
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Savage Khorne Berserker Biker
|
Er my mistake.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:18:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:19:55
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I want to start a pool on when Baconcat strokes out over a typo in some faq. I'm betting December 2021, Chapter Approved.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:24:45
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:21:31
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
I mean he is not wrong, despite being rather extreme. Why do we accept this level of incompetence with proofreading? The Warhammer community is the only one I've seen that repeatedly excuses this stuff every time it comes up. Is that the only difference? That one changes Mind Control and one changes Mental Onslaught? Is the wording for these powers the same because the text is identical the only difference is the name of the power.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:23:47
- Wayne
Formerly WayneTheGame |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:22:28
Subject: Re:Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Because they changed their mind and someone made a mistake putting the files in the proper folders?
The horror.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:22:37
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Wait they left it that you can Mind Control a knight? Interesting.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:23:34
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
As usual, didn’t need a thread tbh.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:24:13
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think after 30 years of expecting them to do differently they they do... At some point isn't it your fault for having the expectation?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:24:22
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Probably the one that's linked on the community website? Not sure where you found the other one, previous link?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:24:50
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Reemule wrote:I want to start a pool on when Baconcat strokes out over a typo in some faq. I'm better December 2021, Chapter Approved.
*eye twitches* It's POLL. YOU'RE JUST AS INCOMPETENT AS GW!
Anyways, seeing as version B is the one that is on the FAQ page (no idea where the other link was dug up from) I'd say that is correct.
|
    
Games Workshop Delenda Est.
Users on ignore- 53.
If you break apart my or anyone else's posts line by line I will not read them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:25:11
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
My issue isn't they made an oopsie poopsie and put the wrong file out.
My issue is they didn't make the corrected file v1.1, so now we have NO SODDING IDEA which one is correct.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:26:34
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Grimtuff wrote:Reemule wrote:I want to start a pool on when Baconcat strokes out over a typo in some faq. I'm better December 2021, Chapter Approved.
*eye twitches* It's POLL. YOU'RE JUST AS INCOMPETENT AS GW!
Anyways, seeing as version B is the one that is on the FAQ page (no idea where the other link was dug up from) I'd say that is correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_pool
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:26:44
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
BaconCatBug wrote:My issue isn't they made an oopsie poopsie and put the wrong file out. My issue is they didn't make the corrected file v1.1, so now we have NO SODDING IDEA which one is correct. To be fair though, if only one is linked on the site how would you even find the other one? I think what is more fun to complain about is how they changed the GSC version of Agents of Vect to be 1/game while the DE version remains as much as you want with just an increased CP cost. Having multiple things that are virtually identical but behave differently is just adding bloat
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:27:55
- Wayne
Formerly WayneTheGame |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:26:45
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Sneaky Lictor
|
Don't feed the troll guys/gals, it feeds off of any and all attention.
Edit: to avoid any confusion, I was referring to the OP
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:28:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:26:52
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
nekooni wrote:
Probably the one that's linked on the community website? Not sure where you found the other one, previous link?
WarCom has the second link. I'd bet Facebook has the first.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:27:20
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
BaconCatBug wrote:My issue is they didn't make the corrected file v1.1, so now we have NO SODDING IDEA which one is correct.
Yes, absolutely none. Unless we go to their website.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:27:43
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
BaconCatBug wrote:My issue isn't they made an oopsie poopsie and put the wrong file out.
My issue is they didn't make the corrected file v1.1, so now we have NO SODDING IDEA which one is correct.
So, we can ask them. And then they will tell us.
I bought all this gasoline for nothing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:28:27
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Witch Hunter in the Shadows
Aachen
|
Daedalus81 wrote:nekooni wrote:
Probably the one that's linked on the community website? Not sure where you found the other one, previous link?
WarCom has the second link. I'd bet Facebook has the first.
FB links to https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/warhammer_40000_genestealer_cults_en.pdf , too.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:28:39
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
nekooni wrote: BaconCatBug wrote:My issue is they didn't make the corrected file v1.1, so now we have NO SODDING IDEA which one is correct.
Yes, absolutely none. Unless we go to their website.
I went to their website earlier and got a different one to the one on the website now, they are both v1.0. Which is correct? They are both Official Updates, v1.0. Do we take the Union, Intersection or Difference of the two documents?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/25 19:29:13
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:29:20
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Is there a version of the "It's fine" meme where the dog is sitting next to a small, well contained and easily controlled fire?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:30:27
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
BaconCatBug wrote:nekooni wrote: BaconCatBug wrote:My issue is they didn't make the corrected file v1.1, so now we have NO SODDING IDEA which one is correct.
Yes, absolutely none. Unless we go to their website.
I went to their website earlier and got a different one to the one on the website now, they are both v1.0. Which is correct? They are both Official Updates, v1.0. Do we take the Union, Intersection or Difference of the two documents?
Well, as far as we know time is a straight line, so the one that came out later? It's not hard.
|
    
Games Workshop Delenda Est.
Users on ignore- 53.
If you break apart my or anyone else's posts line by line I will not read them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:30:44
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
LunarSol wrote:Is there a version of the "It's fine" meme where the dog is sitting next to a small, well contained and easily controlled fire?
As much as BCB tends to overract, I think more people need to hold GW to some sort of professional standard. Too many people just go "eh its not big deal" when that's not the point, the point is that we should expect quality from the "largest miniature company in the world".
|
- Wayne
Formerly WayneTheGame |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:30:55
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
Daedalus81 wrote:nekooni wrote:
Probably the one that's linked on the community website? Not sure where you found the other one, previous link?
WarCom has the second link. I'd bet Facebook has the first.
Facebook's news post thing and Community's FAQ thingamajig both link to identical "version b". Who knows where he found the other one.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:31:09
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
Reemule wrote:I want to start a pool on when Baconcat strokes out over a typo in some faq. I'm betting December 2021, Chapter Approved.
I'm in for $5!
Yes, we all know that GW couldn't proofread themselves out of a library full of plot holes and spelling errors.
But who cares, they're going to fix it. If you(people in general) are so egregiously offended at the fact that GW isnt perfect, maybe you should stop supporting them or talking about them?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:32:13
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Maybe email then? It uses an indirect link. Whatever the case they all settle on version B now.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:32:53
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
Racerguy180 wrote:Reemule wrote:I want to start a pool on when Baconcat strokes out over a typo in some faq. I'm betting December 2021, Chapter Approved.
I'm in for $5!
Yes, we all know that GW couldn't proofread themselves out of a library full of plot holes and spelling errors.
But who cares, they're going to fix it. If you(people in general) are so egregiously offended at the fact that GW isnt perfect, maybe you should stop supporting them or talking about them?
Ah yes the classic GW fan's reply: Just deal with it or stop supporting them.
You know there's a part in between "deal with poor quality" and "stop supporting the company" right?
|
- Wayne
Formerly WayneTheGame |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:32:58
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Wayniac wrote: LunarSol wrote:Is there a version of the "It's fine" meme where the dog is sitting next to a small, well contained and easily controlled fire?
As much as BCB tends to overract, I think more people need to hold GW to some sort of professional standard. Too many people just go "eh its not big deal" when that's not the point, the point is that we should expect quality from the "largest miniature company in the world".
They should, but this is really a mountain out of a molehill when he can just ask them directly instead of spitting his dummy out on here.
|
    
Games Workshop Delenda Est.
Users on ignore- 53.
If you break apart my or anyone else's posts line by line I will not read them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:34:17
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Reemule wrote:Wait they left it that you can Mind Control a knight? Interesting.
Sure - why not? Pew pew!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:35:56
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers
|
Quick, everyone needs to write Bacon cat letters. We NEED TO INTERVENE.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/02/25 19:37:27
Subject: Yet more GW Incompetence: GW Released two different GSC FAQs with the same version number
|
 |
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba
|
You have been able to since the index, so....
|
"Got you, Yugi! Your Rubric Marines can't fall back because I have declared the tertiary kaptaris ka'tah stance two, after the secondary dacatarai ka'tah last turn!"
"So you think, Kaiba! I declared my Thousand Sons the cult of Duplicity, which means all my psykers have access to the Sorcerous Facade power! Furthermore I will spend 8 Cabal Points to invoke Cabbalistic Focus, causing the rubrics to appear behind your custodes! The Vengeance for the Wronged and Sorcerous Fullisade stratagems along with the Malefic Maelstrom infernal pact evoked earlier in the command phase allows me to double their firepower, letting me wound on 2s and 3s!"
"you think it is you who has gotten me, yugi, but it is I who have gotten you! I declare the ever-vigilant stratagem to attack your rubrics with my custodes' ranged weapons, which with the new codex are now DAMAGE 2!!"
"...which leads you straight into my trap, Kaiba, you see I now declare the stratagem Implacable Automata, reducing all damage from your attacks by 1 and triggering my All is Dust special rule!" |
|
 |
 |
|