| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2020/07/13 17:57:18
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
 Ghaz wrote: Daedalus81 wrote: Ghaz wrote:
Looking at the URLs of the FAQs, the Adepta Sororitas FAQ was done in January while most of the rest of them were done last September.
I think maybe they just overwrote the old files from that FAQs at that time.
I've just changed the links for each and every updated FAQ in the Warhammer 40,000 FAQs sticky post in YMDC. I can assure you that GW did not (and never has) just reused the URLs of the old FAQs.
So basically none of the FAQs could possibly account for playtesting? Or did they just create the file then and updated it as they progressed?
This speaks of a much longer timeline for rules writing, which is a little nuts.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 17:57:49
|
|
|
 |
|
2020/07/13 17:57:30
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
Mexico
|
Mariongodspeed wrote:
Its actually Titanic units, not Superheavy. So your Armigers don't get to do it too, unfortunately.
Titanic is super heavy, Armigers never where super heavy units.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:01:33
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:07:10
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
 Shadenuat wrote:Judging by all the FAQs, GW kinda forgot to update Phoenix Rising.
Many of the Phoenix Rising books don’t have FAQs yet.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:08:43
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Phoenix Rising is one book.
|
 5250 pts
 3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K  2500 pts |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:09:00
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Thinknyou mean Psychic Awakening and most of them already had their 8th edition FAQ's just probably very few of them actually need changed for 9th.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:09:06
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Screaming Shining Spear
Russia, Moscow
|
Also I feel they made typo in Craftworlds FAQ which removes Rangers -1 to hit. It should be "change last sentence to read". If anyone can throw them about it somewhere would be nice. I have their FAQmail but honestly doubt they read it.
Also, is unlimited Smite from a single psyker still a thing? Am I missing something, maybe matched/tournament rules?
Ice_can wrote:Thinkn you mean Psychic Awakening and most of them already had their 8th edition FAQ's just probably very few of them actually need changed for 9th.
Phoenix Rising is name of our PA book.
And it has abilities which don't work anymore in 9th.
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:14:13
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:10:35
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
All of the Psychic Awakening books that have existing FAQs have been updated except for Phoenix Rising.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:11:17
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:13:39
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
 jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
 vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
 MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:14:04
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
GW are hoping we all forget it exists, as even they're embarrassed by printing it  .
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:15:37
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Gargantuan Gargant
|
Surprised they haven't touched Saga of the Beast yet, cause that one is long overdue. It even has SM involved so I'm surprised it hasn't been uploaded.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:17:18
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Sternguard are 17 pts. Right in the middle of Intercessors and Tactical Marines.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:20:48
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Terrifying Doombull
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Lias Issodon (if that's who you mean) is Sir Not Appearing in this Book.
Some other FW models went goodbye as well.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:23:41
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:21:37
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
 casvalremdeikun wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Sternguard are 17 pts. Right in the middle of Intercessors and Tactical Marines.
That's almost silly but alright. How did Lias fare? Automatically Appended Next Post: Voss wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Lias Issodon (if that's who you mean) is Sir Not Appearing in this Book.
Uh what about the other FW guys with no model?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:22:11
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:22:48
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Lias has been legended as No model = No Rules welcome to Main studio rules
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:24:28
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Terrifying Doombull
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Voss wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Lias Issodon (if that's who you mean) is Sir Not Appearing in this Book.
Uh what about the other FW guys with no model?
Not sure about 'no model' specifically, but Goonhammer mentioned these, there may be others they deemed 'not relevant'
Chaplain Dreadnoughts
Lias Issodon
Hellwrights
Sororitas Repressors
Death Rider Commissars
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:26:15
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:25:55
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Ice_can wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Lias has been legended as No model = No Rules welcome to Main studio rules
Having a model didn't protect the FW characters from disappearing to begin with(looking at you 8th Ed Index and excluding Hamath Kraatos).
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:26:20
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:28:59
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
That's ridiculous. I'm legit irate. Death Rider Commisars were clearly something needing a deletion. Repressors? Too broken!
I'm guessing the other FW Badab characters with no model did not fare well either.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:29:12
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Voss wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
Voss wrote:Slayer-Fan123 wrote:So how much more is Lias and Sternguard? I pray and hope it's still reasonable to run them together. Seeing as Intercessors are just 20 points, Sternguard should be a lot cheaper.
Lias Issodon (if that's who you mean) is Sir Not Appearing in this Book.
Uh what about the other FW guys with no model?
Not sure about 'no model' specifically, but Goonhammer mentioned these, there may be others they deemed 'not relevant'
Chaplain Dreadnoughts
Lias Issodon
Hellwrights
Sororitas Repressors
Death Rider Commissars
Elysians are out too.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:32:57
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Terrifying Doombull
|
True, though I'm less sure how that works in practice.
If someone put Elysian infantry and heavy weapon squads on the table and told me they were using Regiment traits X & Y, I wouldn't even blink.
I get from the other side, the Elysian player might be upset at losing whatever unique stuff Elysians get, but from the other side of the table, it doesn't have the impact.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:36:57
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:34:40
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Guess I need to rebase my Elysian Snipers then...
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:50:09
Subject: Re:40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
Since the old FAQs no longer apply, it looks like GK and Thousand Sons are now penalized for multiple smites like everyone else?
|
WH40K
  Death Guard 5100 pts.
  Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:53:48
Subject: Re:40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Terrifying Doombull
|
 puma713 wrote:Since the old FAQs no longer apply, it looks like GK and Thousand Sons are now penalized for multiple smites like everyone else?
You mean the warp charge going up? yes.
Barring any special rules buried in their books and not the FAQs, of course.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:55:23
Efficiency is the highest virtue. |
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 18:56:09
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Implacable Skitarii
|
 Tyran wrote:Mariongodspeed wrote:
Its actually Titanic units, not Superheavy. So your Armigers don't get to do it too, unfortunately.
Titanic is super heavy, Armigers never where super heavy units.
Interesting, I always thought Superheavy was the same as Lord of War, not Titanic, since a Super-Heavy Auxilliary Detachment or a Super-Heavy Detachment was required to take Armigers. Good to know.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 18:56:44
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:00:01
Subject: Re:40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
puma713 wrote:Since the old FAQs no longer apply, it looks like GK and Thousand Sons are now penalized for multiple smites like everyone else?
YOU TAKE THAT BACK!
*sigh* I suppose that's probably fair.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:07:36
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Fully-charged Electropriest
UK
|
Missed out on getting a copy of Indomitus this weekend? Don't worry, we've got you covered.
Due to unprecedented demand, Indomitus sold out online in minutes – but we don't want anyone to miss out, so today we’re going to make Indomitus available as a Made to Order item.
If you missed out and still want one, you can order it right now. These will be limited to one per customer order, and they will arrive some time after July 25th (we're not quite sure when right now – we'll make them as fast as we can!).
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 19:07:57
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:08:11
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Implacable Skitarii
|
Indomitus has been added as a made to order (limit 1 per person). Hopefully this helps those who missed out and wanted it!
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:11:52
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Rampaging Reaver Titan Princeps
|
The wailing and gnashing of teeth you can hear is every speculator who purchased multiple sets to resell.
Refunds incoming....
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/13 19:12:44
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:12:38
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Loopstah wrote:Missed out on getting a copy of Indomitus this weekend? Don't worry, we've got you covered.
Due to unprecedented demand, Indomitus sold out online in minutes – but we don't want anyone to miss out, so today we’re going to make Indomitus available as a Made to Order item.
If you missed out and still want one, you can order it right now. These will be limited to one per customer order, and they will arrive some time after July 25th (we're not quite sure when right now – we'll make them as fast as we can!).
Yeah should also help slap down some of those scalping prices, going to laugh if they end up going for under retail on ebay or even better not selling.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:13:42
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Mariongodspeed wrote:Indomitus has been added as a made to order (limit 1 per person). Hopefully this helps those who missed out and wanted it!
Scalpers can suck it lol.
|
|
|
|
|
2020/07/13 19:13:44
Subject: 40k 9th edition, : rules download page 298
|
|
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
Mexico
|
Mariongodspeed wrote: Tyran wrote:Mariongodspeed wrote:
Its actually Titanic units, not Superheavy. So your Armigers don't get to do it too, unfortunately.
Titanic is super heavy, Armigers never where super heavy units.
Interesting, I always thought Superheavy was the same as Lord of War, not Titanic, since a Super-Heavy Auxilliary Detachment or a Super-Heavy Detachment was required to take Armigers. Good to know.
You may have a point there.
But I guess it is more precise to say that Super Heavy is only a detachment name while Lord of War is the battlefield role and Titanic is a Keyword.
And nothing ever got additional rules just for being a Lord of War.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
