Quick question re BA and Assault Intercessors

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Dysartes**

Canonically, red helmet or yellow helmet?

**Platuan4th**

Yellow. They're still classed as Assault units.

**Dysartes**

Platuan4th wrote:
Yellow. They're still classed as Assault units.

Thanks for that, Platuan - when it came to the BA helmet colours, I wasn't sure if they were leaning more on Assault Intercessors or Assault Intercessors, if that makes sense.

Should probably pick up the Supplement at some stage, but I've got 5 Assault Intercessors here from a Recruit Edition starter set to address, and a bit of red sounds about right for them.

**Nevelon**

There are a couple of marine units where their shoulder markings/battlefield role (and helmets for BA I guess) don’t match the game mechanics force org slot. I think supressors are another one. There is a list in the marine codex on chapter organization about what’s where.