Switch Theme:

The good fallen?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker







'lo to all

A while back I made a post asking a few things about the fallen, how many were there, were any good and if the DA would ever let them back in
Anyway, at the bottom some people mentioned this:

HisDivineShadow wrote:
I remember some very very old fluff hinting that the Fallen weren't the ones that were traitors.


Can someone expand on this please?

Any info appreciated

my guys: 40k
7000 4000 3000 5000 Daemonkin rar 3500 Daemons grr 5000 Pick 'n mix warband yaay 7000 Hostile environment tank army ooooh 4000 Imp. night :O 
   
Made in us
Confessor Of Sins




WA, USA

There are some Fallen who, after being zapped away by Chaos, have seen the error of their ways or tried to lead a somewhat normal life. I remember it in the old DA codex, not sure if it is in the new one.

But as far as letting them back in? No, that doesn't happen, period. The biggest reward a repentant Fallen will get is a quick and painless death from the Inerrogator-Chaplain. Which considering what unrepentant Fallen get, is a pretty huge mercy.

 Ouze wrote:

Afterward, Curran killed a guy in the parking lot with a trident.
 
   
Made in eu
Executing Exarch






It was hinted that we didn't know which side won - but the heresy story 'Savage Weapons' put a stop to that. It categorically stated that the Lion was loyal.
Which was a shame, I liked the idea of him being more calculating and waiting to see who was winning

 Blacksails wrote:

Its because ordinance is still a word.
However, firing ordinance at someone isn't nearly as threatening as firing ordnance at someone.
Ordinance is a local law, or bill, or other form of legislation.
Ordnance is high caliber explosives.
No 'I' in ordnance.
Don't drown the enemy in legislation, drown them in explosives.
 
   
Made in gb
Chalice-Wielding Sanguinary High Priest





Stevenage, UK

The way I see it is - if Luther were really the good guy, he wouldn't be so persistent about the Lion "forgiving" him. He wouldn't have been in the wrong.

"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is yielding. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I am attacking." - General Ferdinand Foch  
   
Made in us
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter




Seattle

thetallestgiraffe wrote:
'lo to all

A while back I made a post asking a few things about the fallen, how many were there, were any good and if the DA would ever let them back in
Anyway, at the bottom some people mentioned this:

HisDivineShadow wrote:
I remember some very very old fluff hinting that the Fallen weren't the ones that were traitors.


Can someone expand on this please?

Any info appreciated


"A Heretic may see the truth and seek redemption. He may be forgiven his past and will be absolved in death. A Traitor can never be forgiven. A Traitor will never find peace in this world or the next. There is nothing as wretched or as hated in all the world as a Traitor."

It is best to be a pessimist. You are usually right and, when you're wrong, you're pleasantly surprised. 
   
Made in us
Sneaky Striking Scorpion





In earlier publications it was quite popular to write your story in such a fashion that it could be open for interpretation or discussion. Many of the characters were morally ambiguous or indifferent, and they authors set them up to be mysterious so that the players could decide for themselves what they wanted to believe.

Unfortunately the current practice seems quite different. The writers are being more definite in their renditions of the characters and factions, which removes the mystery and provides a narrower or more limited view of the setting. The only defense the players really have against this new style of writing is to conclude that the material is written "form perspective" meaning that it is presented as fact, but from the perspective of the faction being depicted.

For my part, I think the DA being concretely loyal is an exception to my previous statement in that such a change actually does more good than harm to the setting overall. The core focus of the game's drama is played out in the form of Space Marines Vs. Chaos Space Marines. The writing was clever enough that players could logically justify taking either side depending on their personal preference or point of view. The story of Lion and Luther was essentially the same story in a minor key and was more or less redundant.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/22 20:59:32


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: