A drug that can reverse aspects of ageing has been successfully trialled in animals, say scientists.
They have rejuvenated old mice to restore their stamina, coat of fur and even some organ function.
The team at Erasmus University Medical Center, in the Netherlands, are planning human trials for what they hope is a treatment for old age.
A UK scientist said the findings were "impossible to dismiss", but that unanswered questions remained.
The approach works by flushing out retired or "senescent" cells in the body that have stopped dividing.
They accumulate naturally with age and have a role in wound healing and stopping tumours.
But while they appear to just sit there, senescent cells release chemicals that cause inflammation and have been implicated in ageing.
The group of scientists created a drug that selectively killed senescent cells by disrupting the chemical balance within them.
"I got very rebellious, people insisted I was crazy for trying and for the first three times they were right," Dr Peter de Keizer told the BBC.
'Crazy'
On the fourth attempt he had something that seemed to work.
He tested it on mice that were just old (the equivalent of 90 in mouse years), those genetically programmed to age very rapidly and those aged by chemotherapy.
The findings, published in the journal Cell, showed liver function was easily restored and the animals doubled the distance they would run in a wheel.
Dr de Keizer said: "We weren't planning to look at their hair, but it was too obvious to miss."




He also said there were a lot of "grey" results - things that seemed to improve in some mice but not all.
The drug was given three times a week and the experiments have been taking place for nearly a year.
There are no signs of side-effects but "mice don't talk", Dr de Keizer said. However, it is thought the drug would have little to no effect on normal tissues.
When asked if this was a drug for ageing, Dr Keizer told the BBC News website: "I hope so, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating as you say.
"In terms of mouse work we are pretty much done, we could look at specific age-related diseases eg osteoporosis, but we should now prepare for clinical translation."
Commenting on the results, Dr Dusko Ilic, a stem cell scientist at King's College London, said: "The finding is impossible to dismiss.
"[But] until more high-quality research is done, it is better to be reserved about these findings.
"Though, I would not be surprised if manufacturers try to capitalise on this and, in a few years, we could buy this peptide as a supplement over the counter."
Prof Ilaria Bellantuono, Professor in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, called for further tests on "heart, muscle, metabolic, cognitive function" to take place.
But added: "The use of this peptide in patients is a long way away.
"It requires careful consideration about safety, about the appropriate group of patients for whom this peptide can be beneficial in a reasonable period of time so that positive effects can be easily measured at an affordable cost."

 SlaveToDorkness wrote:
Why would we want younger mice?

 timetowaste85 wrote:
To be the "downer" in this...we age and die due to necessity. If we didn't die, we'd overpopulate more than we already do. It sounds awesome. But...making people live longer? It sounds great, if we can terraform other planets and branch out. Otherwise we're in trouble. Trust me, I feel like an ass typing that, with its intended use for cancer patients who get a serious bum rap...but...realistically, this will cause further problems if it works.

AllSeeingSkink wrote:

 timetowaste85 wrote:
To be the "downer" in this...we age and die due to necessity. If we didn't die, we'd overpopulate more than we already do. It sounds awesome. But...making people live longer? It sounds great, if we can terraform other planets and branch out. Otherwise we're in trouble. Trust me, I feel like an ass typing that, with its intended use for cancer patients who get a serious bum rap...but...realistically, this will cause further problems if it works.

If you have a drug that lets people live forever I'd be fine if it was only given to people weren't procreating or had strict limits on it. Actually I wonder if it'd naturally reduce peoples' desire to have kids if they knew they were going to live forever.

 timetowaste85 wrote:
To be the "downer" in this...we age and die due to necessity. If we didn't die, we'd overpopulate more than we already do. It sounds awesome. But...making people live longer? It sounds great, if we can terraform other planets and branch out. Otherwise we're in trouble. Trust me, I feel like an ass typing that, with its intended use for cancer patients who get a serious bum rap...but...realistically, this will cause further problems if it works.

 n0t_u wrote:

 timetowaste85 wrote:
To be the "downer" in this...we age and die due to necessity. If we didn't die, we'd overpopulate more than we already do. It sounds awesome. But...making people live longer? It sounds great, if we can terraform other planets and branch out. Otherwise we're in trouble. Trust me, I feel like an ass typing that, with its intended use for cancer patients who get a serious bum rap...but...realistically, this will cause further problems if it works.

Don't worry if it becomes reality the super rich would try to keep their claws on it forever. It'd never be available widely enough for that to be an issue.

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:

 n0t_u wrote:

 timetowaste85 wrote:
To be the "downer" in this...we age and die due to necessity. If we didn't die, we'd overpopulate more than we already do. It sounds awesome. But...making people live longer? It sounds great, if we can terraform other planets and branch out. Otherwise we're in trouble. Trust me, I feel like an ass typing that, with its intended use for cancer patients who get a serious bum rap...but...realistically, this will cause further problems if it works.

Don't worry if it becomes reality the super rich would try to keep their claws on it forever. It'd never be available widely enough for that to be an issue.

Pretty much this, and it's what SciFi has predicted. The Haves remain young and healthy forever. The Have-Nots become a disposable underclass. Society begins to stagnate.

 Yodhrin wrote:

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:

 n0t_u wrote:

 timetowaste85 wrote:
To be the "downer" in this...we age and die due to necessity. If we didn't die, we'd overpopulate more than we already do. It sounds awesome. But...making people live longer? It sounds great, if we can terraform other planets and branch out. Otherwise we're in trouble. Trust me, I feel like an ass typing that, with its intended use for cancer patients who get a serious bum rap...but...realistically, this will cause further problems if it works.

Don't worry if it becomes reality the super rich would try to keep their claws on it forever. It'd never be available widely enough for that to be an issue.

Pretty much this, and it's what SciFi has predicted. The Haves remain young and healthy forever. The Have-Nots become a disposable underclass. Society begins to stagnate.

And then the Have-Nots start getting very interested in French history.

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
And just like the English, French, American and Russian Revolution, that simply changes who happen to be the Haves.

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Well, Civil War. Did away with the monarchy, until the English rightly realised Puritans are no fun.

Blood from human teens rejuvenates body and brains of old mice