Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

(Due to a post a few down.... i renamed the Subject line) Hey guys.....i just found this photo on my computer of a stompa i totally scratch built when the new Apoc rules came out a year or so ago. I really wanted one and tried to copy the best i could from some of the examples they had in the Apoc rule book. Now that I have GW's stompa I realize how off i was in the proper size. I ended up selling this massive beast to someone in Australia for $200.00 just before I found out about the new Stompa coming out. I could have used the Gargant! Anyhow i played in a tourny with it and won. Let me know what you think.

Nice looking scratchbuild! I like it!

Can I use cute as a descriptive word for a Gargant? It's definitely cute.

A cute ork gargant? Perhaps that is why i sold it. Lol. Come on.... it's not that cute is it?

I added a poll question due to Chrispy's post. Make sure you vote!

^_^ ^_^ ^_^ Cute

See my profile pic, and then think gargant

Your profile pic is cute. Lol. That should settle the debate.

Thats a pretty sweet gargant. You shouldnt of sold it! Or better yet..... build a new one lol

I think it has to be judged on cuteness for ork standards. That being the case, I would have to say that it is very cute.

looks orktastic