| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 03:07:53
Subject: Mephiston
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
|
I've been putting this model off for a long time because I didn't think I'd do it any justice, But I needed it for a tournament so I had to get it painted.
Let me know what you think.
Thanks.
|
d-usa wrote:Orks are the GW version of R2D2. No matter how advanced the defenses may be, there is always an open serial port somewhere that can be pluged into and a firewall that was never configured. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 03:59:25
Subject: Mephiston
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
No two ways about it, that's a nicely painted model.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 04:08:25
Subject: Re:Mephiston
|
 |
One Canoptek Scarab in a Swarm
|
Nice painting dude. Real nice.
But am I the only one to think this model is badly designed? I mean: the pose is kind of cheesy, the whole guy looks rather generic... tell me I'm not alone...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 04:10:19
Subject: Re:Mephiston
|
 |
Using Object Source Lighting
|
charley29 wrote:Nice painting dude. Real nice.
But am I the only one to think this model is badly designed? I mean: the pose is kind of cheesy, the whole guy looks rather generic... tell me I'm not alone...
Yeah, the model's ancient, and it shows. Nice job with the painting, but I wish it were on a mini that deserved the paint job....
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 04:10:37
Subject: Re:Mephiston
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
charley29 wrote:Nice painting dude. Real nice.
But am I the only one to think this model is badly designed? I mean: the pose is kind of cheesy, the whole guy looks rather generic... tell me I'm not alone...
You are definitely not alone, Captain Tyco, Brother Corbulo and Mephistion are sorely in need of a remodelling!
Awesome work on this model though, looks real good, I like the extra height given by the base as well. Good work!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 04:27:56
Subject: Mephiston
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
An excellent paintjob on a model that is a classic and still quite nice even by today's standards.
I shudder to think of what ridiculous pose GW would come up with if they tried to re-do this Jes masterpiece!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/17 04:59:24
Subject: Re:Mephiston
|
 |
Contagious Dreadnought of Nurgle
|
Always liked that mini. Good job dude, nice paint job, nice base.....Nice!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/18 13:07:56
Subject: Mephiston
|
 |
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant
Alexandria, VA
|
Great looking model. You have some crappy lighting (no offense) but the shadows and highlights still come through, especially his face. Looks awesome here, must look 10x better in person.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/19 13:31:17
Subject: Re:Mephiston
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It's a classic model from a bygone GW era; one where models oozed character and atmosphere, not the horrific malformed pieces of plastic rubbish that pass for "characters" today.
Kids these days, sheesh...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/20 07:19:34
Subject: Mephiston
|
 |
Aspirant Tech-Adept
|
I'm one of the ones who doesn't particularly like this model. Albeit, it is a classic. You've painted it wonderfully though. Really good work. The cape from the back looks amazing.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|