Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 12:37:00
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
[DCM]
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
These appear to be changes made in the new fliers book.
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?categoryId=1000018&pIndex=1&aId=3000006&multiPageMode=true&start=2
Amongst other things, IG Valkyries and Vendettas lose Scout and Deep Strike.
[With most, if not all, of this being for fliers, see the thread about Death from The Skies]
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/02/16 12:42:51
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 12:40:29
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Skinnereal wrote:Amongst other things, IG Valkaries and Vendettas lose Scout and Deep Strike.
That's pretty significant, right? Not that Vendettas necessarily need any help  but still...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 12:40:57
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Water-Caste Negotiator
|
Makes you wonder what the point of Death From The Skies is XD
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 12:43:17
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
[DCM]
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
GW's site needs updates, as the Valkyrie item page still lists those 2 rules.
Death From The Skies is now the only way to get rules for some of these units on paper, since WD for them is out of print.
Electronic updates are there in the codices, but we can now buy them in book for now, too.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/16 12:44:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 12:54:09
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Battleship Captain
The Land of the Rising Sun
|
One has to wonder if they bother reading through the faqs before updating them. The Eldar one has two different fixes for the same rule Intercept.
M.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/16 12:54:34
Jenkins: You don't have jurisdiction here!
Smith Jamison: We aren't here, which means when we open up on you and shred your bodies with automatic fire then this will never have happened.
About the Clans: "Those brief outbursts of sense can't hold back the wave of sibko bred, over hormoned sociopaths that they crank out though." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 13:07:24
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yeah,
The Ork FAQ invalidates the Ork WD flier update.
So the only valid rules for Ork fliers are the new £20 death from the skies or the £6 iPad download.
Panic...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 13:38:01
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Yeah. I noticed that the FAQ for the Stormtalon and Ork flyer entries basically read "Buy the limited edition deluxe FAQ"
|
I'm expecting an Imperial Knights supplement dedicated to GW's loyalist apologetics. Codex: White Knights "In the grim dark future, everything is fine."
"The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit,
lose everything that we hold dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky."
-Tom Kirby |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 13:39:14
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
I like the BA update.
"Page 38/94 – Stormraven Gunships, Skies of Blood.
Replace this rule with the following:
Skies of Fury:......"
They changed it so much they had to rename it? LOL
|
The Imperial Navy, A Galatic Force for Good. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 13:40:41
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
And I don't know why, but for some reason the way they're putting in entries that mention BT looks like it might get sucked into C:SM.
|
I'm expecting an Imperial Knights supplement dedicated to GW's loyalist apologetics. Codex: White Knights "In the grim dark future, everything is fine."
"The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit,
lose everything that we hold dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky."
-Tom Kirby |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 13:43:02
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Arschbombe wrote:I like the BA update.
"Page 38/94 – Stormraven Gunships, Skies of Blood.
Replace this rule with the following:
Skies of Fury:......"
They changed it so much they had to rename it? LOL
It was the same rule with two different names in the BA and GK codex- with it added to the SM and BT codex as well, they updated the rule and picked a codex-neutral name for all the books to use.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 13:44:21
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Cog in the Machine
|
Anyone find it funny they put out the Polish FAQs for Space Marines and Space Wolves as well as the english. Got me confused there for a moment thinking they broke something weird.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 14:51:10
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
Savageconvoy wrote:Yeah. I noticed that the FAQ for the Stormtalon and Ork flyer entries basically read "Buy the limited edition deluxe FAQ"
Death from the Skies is not Limited Edition.
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 14:58:20
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Cultist of Nurgle with Open Sores
|
Hopefully updating the FAQ and Errata will please the people who've been complaining that they would need to buy the new book to play their IG, BA, or other armies. The book is not limited edition and it appears to be optional (unless you don't already have the rules for your fliers, but hey, at least they're making the rules available again).
|
2,500 pts. | 3,200 pts. | 4,000 pts. | 2,000 pts | 2,500 | 3,000 pts. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:16:02
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Both dark eldar flyers lost deep strike. As did the necron flyers.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:18:29
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
Looks like everyone did. And Valkyries lost Scout. Not that they really needed it, what with the additional mobility of being a Flyer.
|
The supply does not get to make the demands. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:23:43
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Looks like a streamlining of rules to reflect how GW sees flying units now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:28:06
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Speed Drybrushing
|
Did i read it correct that Black templars can take the Strom talon as well as the raven?
Q: Land Speeder Storms, Stormraven Gunships and Stormtalon
Gunships are all listed as Space Marine vehicles in the Reference
section. Does this mean that every Space Marine Chapter now has
access to these vehicles as well (i.e . Space Wolves, Blood Angels,
Grey Knights etc.)? (p411)
A: No – you may usually only select units and vehicles that are
available in the army list section of your codex. The two
exceptions are the Stormtalon and Stormraven Gunships,
which are available to armies chosen from Codex: Space
Marines and Codex: Black Templars. The rules for using these
Flyers can be found in the Death From the Skies compendium
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/16 15:28:39
Ravenwing 8,0 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:30:38
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Cultist of Nurgle with Open Sores
|
Arrathon wrote:Did i read it correct that Black templars can take the Strom talon as well as the raven?
Q: Land Speeder Storms, Stormraven Gunships and Stormtalon
Gunships are all listed as Space Marine vehicles in the Reference
section. Does this mean that every Space Marine Chapter now has
access to these vehicles as well (i.e . Space Wolves, Blood Angels,
Grey Knights etc.)? (p411)
A: No – you may usually only select units and vehicles that are
available in the army list section of your codex. The two
exceptions are the Stormtalon and Stormraven Gunships,
which are available to armies chosen from Codex: Space
Marines and Codex: Black Templars. The rules for using these
Flyers can be found in the Death From the Skies compendium
Looks like it. At least that's how I'm reading it too.
|
2,500 pts. | 3,200 pts. | 4,000 pts. | 2,000 pts | 2,500 | 3,000 pts. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:34:50
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Speed Drybrushing
|
hmmm.... so many modeling possibilities. what ta do...what ta do..Now i need to take a look at the BT codex and see if i like it.
|
Ravenwing 8,0 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:36:20
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
Agamemnon2 wrote:Looks like everyone did. And Valkyries lost Scout. Not that they really needed it, what with the additional mobility of being a Flyer.
Right, they couldn't use Scout anyway, as they don't start on the board.
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 15:40:26
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
DC Metro
|
They could have used Scout to Outflank before, which was extremely useful.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 16:00:15
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 16:06:52
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Slippery Ultramarine Scout Biker
|
Telion has a camo cloak and stealth, does this mean he gets a 2+ cover save when in 4+ cover? Does his unit of scouts get it as well without any upgrades?
|
10,000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 16:10:59
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Miguelsan wrote:One has to wonder if they bother reading through the faqs before updating them. The Eldar one has two different fixes for the same rule Intercept.
M.
They in fact, do not. The DA FAQ states a wargear fix in the army section for Azreal but out of 3 entries on that page...he's on the one before it. A month later they apparently still haven't noticed that.
I guess the fix was more important than the page number but yeah... bonkers.
Savageconvoy wrote:Yeah. I noticed that the FAQ for the Stormtalon and Ork flyer entries basically read "Buy the limited edition deluxe FAQ"
Your thing has new rules, you buy book yes?  Doesn't seem to come out and say that for all of them though. Funny thing is looking at the dates and seeing who still lacks flyers...might've been a good occasion to fix that what with this book and all. Would have been interested then!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 16:23:19
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Terrifying Wraith
|
Mmmm now Tyranid FAQ are now in Polish....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 16:23:56
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Deranged Necron Destroyer
Somewhere Ironic
|
And SW still don't have a flyer or anything to deal with flyers. Fun.
|
DQ:90S++G++MB++I--Pw40k01+D+A++/hWD-R+++T(D)DM+
Organiser of 40k Montreal
There is only war in Montreal
kronk wrote:The International Programmers Society has twice met to get the world to agree on one methodology for programming dates. Both times they met, the meeting devolved into a giant Unreal Tournament Lan party... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 18:45:51
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Arrathon wrote:Did i read it correct that Black templars can take the Strom talon as well as the raven?
Q: Land Speeder Storms, Stormraven Gunships and Stormtalon
Gunships are all listed as Space Marine vehicles in the Reference
section. Does this mean that every Space Marine Chapter now has
access to these vehicles as well (i.e . Space Wolves, Blood Angels,
Grey Knights etc.)? (p411)
A: No – you may usually only select units and vehicles that are
available in the army list section of your codex. The two
exceptions are the Stormtalon and Stormraven Gunships,
which are available to armies chosen from Codex: Space
Marines and Codex: Black Templars. The rules for using these
Flyers can be found in the Death From the Skies compendium
According to RAW, Blood Angels and Grey Knights just lost their Storm Raven
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 19:12:26
Subject: Re:GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
Kroothawk wrote: Arrathon wrote:Did i read it correct that Black templars can take the Strom talon as well as the raven?
Q: Land Speeder Storms, Stormraven Gunships and Stormtalon
Gunships are all listed as Space Marine vehicles in the Reference
section. Does this mean that every Space Marine Chapter now has
access to these vehicles as well (i.e . Space Wolves, Blood Angels,
Grey Knights etc.)? (p411)
A: No – you may usually only select units and vehicles that are
available in the army list section of your codex. The two
exceptions are the Stormtalon and Stormraven Gunships,
which are available to armies chosen from Codex: Space
Marines and Codex: Black Templars. The rules for using these
Flyers can be found in the Death From the Skies compendium
According to RAW, Blood Angels and Grey Knights just lost their Storm Raven 
Except Codex > Rulebook right, so I do still have my Storm Ravens.
Also, GW FINALLY fixed that stupid argument with the Valks/Vendetta. We all knew scout was going away, which is now official. It also looks like they don't have any other change, so Death from the Skies shouldn't change AV/points cost.
I am still angry now that everyone gets the raven, it feels like it has much less flavor now. Changing the name of the rule hurts.
Also, why did almost every flyer in the game lose deepstrike?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/02/16 19:16:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 19:14:36
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
So since the faq didn't change the foc slot of gk stormraven, the placement of the product on gw webpage is wrong ?
(Atm the gk stormraven is in the heavy support slot of grey knight page)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/16 19:17:19
Subject: GW releases 40k FAQs for Feb. Rulebook errata 1.3
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Nasakenai wrote:Telion has a camo cloak and stealth, does this mean he gets a 2+ cover save when in 4+ cover?
Yes.
As long as Telion is alive, his unit has Stealth. However, the further +1 camo-cloak bonus applies only to Telion unless you purchase camo-cloaks for the rest of the squad.
|
|
 |
 |
|