Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2023/05/08 23:35:19
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
So there are a few things with Thunderstrike in the name.
Thunderstrike Brotherhoods are a formation of Stormcast that led the initial charge into the Mortal Realms. The units that came with the first AoS start box on the Stormcast side are what make up a Thunderstrike Brotherhood:
Spoiler:
The Thunderstrike Host is the newest wave of Stormcast clad in Thunderstrike Armour, an enhanced version of the Sigmarite plate worn by the Stormcast. When Be'lakor enacted a ritual known as the Cursed Skies, Stormcast became unable to return to Azyr for Reforging. The Thunderstrike Armour bypasses this curse and allows its wearers to be reborn again.
Sadly Lexicanum only has the Warhammer Fest 2021 Community article listed. It's probably in the rulebook as well and possibly the Stormcast Battletome.
I know the Cursed Skies ritual was from Broken Realms though.
I +1 the "anything by Josh". IT was a dark day that BL lost him as a writer as he not only wrote a LOT but he really got the setting and was doing really great stuff with it. Huge shame and I feel like with BL having so many of hteir authors tied up in 40K stuff we are missing out without Josh. Esp as he did things that weren't just "this book is for the next X release" type books.
I'd also recommend checking out any of the Novella stories. They are all generally really solid writing and give a nice adventure feel without getting too deep.
Gotrek books are also a good read, though I wish they'd get some sense of long term plan with him. I feel like he keeps jumping to new ideas at the end of every book only to re-set at the start of the next. Plus there's this constant "going to bring all the dwaves back" kinda feel to every single one that never happens that just feels like the writing team are waiting on the design and release team to update dwarves to actually advance Gotrek's story/character
I’ll check out Josh.
I’m almost done with the stormcast rulebook and i swear it’s like i read it twice. Feels like there’s a lot of repetition.
2023/05/14 23:35:58
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
I hate the Age of Sigmar setting, with a passion. But I gave Dark Harvest a go for the WH Horror section, and it was absolutely fantastic. Well set, great tones, and an interesting and unexpected twist on an unexplored part of the Age of Sigmar fluff. The audiobook in particular was great.
It was so good I basically stole the themes for the next of my DnD homebrew campaign arcs.
2023/05/15 03:28:58
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
Overread wrote: I +1 the "anything by Josh". IT was a dark day that BL lost him as a writer as he not only wrote a LOT but he really got the setting and was doing really great stuff with it. Huge shame and I feel like with BL having so many of hteir authors tied up in 40K stuff we are missing out without Josh. Esp as he did things that weren't just "this book is for the next X release" type books.
I'd also recommend checking out any of the Novella stories. They are all generally really solid writing and give a nice adventure feel without getting too deep.
Gotrek books are also a good read, though I wish they'd get some sense of long term plan with him. I feel like he keeps jumping to new ideas at the end of every book only to re-set at the start of the next. Plus there's this constant "going to bring all the dwaves back" kinda feel to every single one that never happens that just feels like the writing team are waiting on the design and release team to update dwarves to actually advance Gotrek's story/character
Yeah BL getting rid of Josh was a bad move tbh. He was doing some great stuff for AoS and then they ditched him overnight. He says that BL reasoning is that they wanted to go a different direction with AoS lore. But then one of the first novels they released after they let him go was godsbane, which is pretty much the exact same story blurb as Spear of Shadows, just with an extra stormcast! (Maybe the story is vastly different, but I've not had a chance to read godsbane yet)
I honestly think there was more to them getting rid of him as the 'main' AoS writer than what has been said publicly, but we will never know. I'm just bitter than Spear of Shadows will never see the end of the trilogy now. Only logically thing I can think is that he was becoming the main writer of AoS and they didn' t want any one name associated too strongly with the IP. But that's just my guess and is probably wildly off!
I haven't really been on board with AoS books all that much but I can break down what I've read:
Spoiler:
Realmgate Wars Omnibus 1 and 2 - Fine. Mostly just a novelisation of what was happening in the campaign books.
Soul Wars - Great, loved it. The interactions between the undead generals were great.
Nagash: Undying King - Again, great. Really good from start to finish.
Gitslayer - Disturbing in many ways, thank you Gloomspite. Still a good read though.
Ghoulslayer - Meh.
Overlords of the Iron Dragon - Forgetable.
Godeater's Son - Brilliant. I 100% recommend it. I bought it to try and get myself a bigger book that I wouldn't read in a short span and ended up doing just that.
The biggest issue IMO for the early AoS stuff is that it was blindingly obvious how much interference from Marketing there was. Undying King and Soul Wars are really good books but there are some utterly jarring moments where a character will just say something that is clearly out-of-universe. The worst one is Nefferata saying "Welcome to the Deathlords." which made me physically cringe at the forcefulness of it.
2023/05/15 11:44:21
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
Yeah I think that's one big issue with AoS. Because it was born of marketing and managers it doesn't have the same heart and sole to it.
It doesn't feel like its got a lead writer or pair or small team that's really die-hard loving the setting. Building maps, stories, interconnected events events and such.
It has a very fragmented feel; heck the simple lack of dates and any effective maps (we are starting to get those) made it really hard to tell when things happen in relation to each other.
Even the main story we don't actually have any real idea how long the Age of Sigmar has been going on for. Some books suggest that its already many centuries since the Stormcast marched forth; others suggest that its only decades since. About the only dating are big events; eg before or after the Necroquake, but that is super rough.
AoS lore feels bitty and chopped up somewhat and lacking an overall focus save for following marketing and production and sort of creating a story that revolves around the Gods kinda.
The thing with the whole dating part of it I actually don't mind. We're not talking about a single planet but entire realms that have different seasons and calendars, strapping a dating system on there IMO would lead to more issues than it solves. Heck, look at 40k where the first rule about the background dating system is "Don't trust the dating system".
I do get the irritation though. People like to have solid dates for when things happen so they can plan around them and have their characters participate but I think AoS is a lot more forgiving than 40k considering how long lived or flat out immortal certain characters are. Vampires, Aelves, Dawi (I will not use Duardin), Bone Dudes, Chaos monsters, Stormcast, and the list goes on. I think the only ones that suffer are Humans but then people can just add more numbers to the ends of their names and create whole dynasties.
I think the real issue is that online sources aren't nearly as well-curated as 40k or WHFB mostly because it hasn't been around as long but that the fanbase has grown only recently so older publications just aren't there to be used. I can hop on the 40k Lexicanum and find pretty much everything with a citation to which book the info came from but the AoS side is basically empty. Heck, Arkhan the Black got thrown into the void between realms in the Broken Realms series, and his Lex article is about four lines long featuring more about his appearance than his history. Katakros however, has a full article with links to the Ossiarch reveal videos and the books he's featured in.
I do think there is a turning point coming for AoS where the online sources are coming closer to matching those of 40k and the Old World though and I'm glad that the setting is getting more solid.
2023/05/15 14:22:37
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
Thing is 40K has a dating system. You can 100% date things to specific points in time in relation to each other.
Now yes GW does make a mess of it, heck they even had to ret-con a bunch of dates because they wound up taking the 40K setting toward its last years and didn't want to start marketing 41K as a game.
For me in AoS yes each realm has its own dates, but at the same time they are interacting with each other in an insane degree. These aren't worlds so vastly far apart that events on them won't ever be felt; events on one are most certainly felt on the others.
Honestly AoS feels just like a managers pitch; a setting so open and free that there's no foundation. Which is exactly what AoS was as a product at launch. It wasn't meant to be a lore or game or anything more than the most casual light touch spread over the sale of models.
I'd also argue that the number of immortal or long lived characters in AoS is ok, except it entirely means that humans don't work. Which is a problem because a LOT of people associate with humans and it also hinders your human characters. Also just because many of the races can live very long lifespans; it doesn't really help either.
Again we hit the issue of trying to judge time - is that elf who can't recall the Age of Chaos 1000 years old or 100? Is that massive city built by magic and Sigma in a year; or did it grow over many generations? Are those trade networks established over generations of caravans exploring the world or are they simply the result of rapid expansoin in the last 30 years?
Again all these things are solved by a simple mapping and dating system and trying to hand-wave it all away as impossible or just so complex I think kind of creates a setting that is hard to get into through a total lack of proper foundations.
Now I'm totally open to the idea of the AoS setting having a period of chaos and settling down; to having some kind of big events "The Time Vortex" that suddenly knocks the realms onto general time (like the Necro Quake awoke many ancient powers); creating a period of confusion within the setting nad lore and then an age of order nad structure and such.
Thing is freedom to create your own is given by firm foundations. You could found your own stories in Old World or 40K because you know how things relate in space and time to each other.
You know when a huge hive fleet is smashing into a region of space and what might be happening there because its marked in space and time.
You can't easily tell if your kingdom in the Realm of Fire in relation to anything save the Necroquake or the start of the Age of Sigmar. So its harder to perhaps tie it into stories that you've read; or to understand the passing of time and such.
I don't want exact dates. They are a pain for lore fans and writers alike. What I want is eras to be marked out with length. We know the Age of Chaos was ~400 years and that is extremely helpful, but locking down how long the RGW/Age of Sigmar was, how long the Soul Wars were, etc. Would help a great deal.
I'm going to break this up so it isn't a brick of text.
Maps
Spoiler:
Maps have been a thing in AoS since the very start, in fact, I still have the big map of the realms on my wall from when Realmgate Wars was released. Do they map the entirety of the Mortal Realms? No, because that would be silly, they're effectively infinite spaces after all. However, they do focus on specific areas like the Great Parch in Aqshy or Prime Interlands in Shyish which in turn are already huge spaces with monuments, landmasses, coastlines, oceans, and forests named and located for people to build upon. AoS gives you these areas that GW builds up and focuses on for mainline stories while also giving players their own space to craft their stories. There are objectively important places such as the Eightpoints, the Free Cities, Idoneth Enclaves, or Fyreslayer Lodges just as in the Old World there were Imperial Provinces, Dwarf Holds, or Nehekaran Kingdoms.
Human perspective
Spoiler:
I'd argue that the lack of a unifying human perspective is a boon rather than a curse. In the same way that human characters enhance Space Marines in 40k, they enhance longer-lived or immortal characters in AoS by bringing that mortal perspective to things. Exploring the tragic aspect of immortality is a favourite trope of mine as well so I'm very biased in that regard.
Events in relation to players
Spoiler:
I'd argue that only the big numbers matter to the majority of people. Most people don't care what happened on 601390.M38 (The Rogue Trader House of Ecale and the Marines Errant Space Marine Chapter seal a covenant in blood) but they do care that the Age of Apostasy was in M36 or that the Third War for Armageddon was in M41.
Obviously, there are those who like more exact dates for things, and a lot of older Warhammer players are used to that sort of system myself included. That being said I don't think it's necessary for the setting to be good as there are big event points in AoS that people who know the setting can base their stories around just like with 40k.
2023/05/15 17:58:45
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
I'd ague that its hard to explore the nature of immortal or long lived lifespans when you don't have an effective dating system to allow mortal lifespans to be measured and accounted for.
I agree its not that I'm after specific dates down to exact days, but a general ability to know that its been X number of years; or generations of humans; to know that event A happens before, after or during event B without either one having to be a massive event like the Necroquake.
For me a good example is the Gotrek Stories. As you read the AoS' ones right now its actually really hard to work out just when they are happening. The stories suggest that he's travelled for only a short span of time and yet some of the events are pairing up to the main storylines which seem to move much slower with decades and long periods between them.
Eg Necroquake to Morathi' rising up as a God is covered. That, far as I'm aware, is a pretty big span of time and yet in the Gotrek stories it feels like hardly any time at all unless we expect Malineth to be spending VAST amounts of time just hanging out with a drunk depressed dwarf between adventures. Which does happen but I doubt she'd spend years doing that.
I'd highly recommend Gombrindal. A surprisingly great look at Duardin culture in the mortal realms. Hallowed Ground is also pretty good. A pretty dark look at a messed up father daughter relationship.
2023/06/02 11:15:38
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
The original Gotrek and Felix books are the Old World while the more recent ones (Ghoulslayer, Gitslayer, and I think Realmslayer?) are set in the Mortal Realms.
2023/06/02 11:40:58
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
thanks Gert.
is there an actual book version of realmslayer or a collection that includes it?
i can only find the audio book.
gotreks transition to the new world sounds like a good place to start his series of books.
2023/06/02 13:26:31
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
There was a limited release of the transcript of Realmslayer, however I don't think its still in print. Also its a transcript so it lacks some of the value that you get with an audio novel.
Also the sequel didn't get a release. Honestly I'd say get both - they are audio novels and you get to hear Brian Blessed being Gotrek! They are fairly important too as they setup his story for the Mortal Realms and lead into the stories.
Also the latest - Blightslayer - is really good and creates a few longer term story plots and questions outside of Gotrek alone.
usernamesareannoying wrote: thanks Gert.
is there an actual book version of realmslayer or a collection that includes it?
i can only find the audio book.
gotreks transition to the new world sounds like a good place to start his series of books.
The first one is really good but they decided to ditch the narrator for the second one and go with dialogue only. I think it suffered as a result.
I think the Gotrek books are deliberately written as an intro to AoS. There's a lot of Gotrek saying wtf is that and then someone explains it to him.
2023/06/03 08:40:02
Subject: Recommend your favorite age of sigmar books...
usernamesareannoying wrote: thanks Gert.
is there an actual book version of realmslayer or a collection that includes it?
i can only find the audio book.
gotreks transition to the new world sounds like a good place to start his series of books.
The first one is really good but they decided to ditch the narrator for the second one and go with dialogue only. I think it suffered as a result.
I think the Gotrek books are deliberately written as an intro to AoS. There's a lot of Gotrek saying wtf is that and then someone explains it to him.
.
To be fair that's almost like it was for the Old World. Only a little less "on your nose" style because Gotrek and Felix were from the Old World. But they still had to learn about a lot of factions that they might otherwise only have heard about from rumour; or Gotrek only know of from a few hundred years ago or a grudge or such. Gotrek books were always about picking a major in-game faction and introducing them to readers through Gotrek's adventures. Honestly its a very solid way to create a character that remains stable with a loyal fanbase and then introduce the world through their eyes and the myriad of factions (even if many of them end up getting sliced up on his axe)
I've only read/listened to Nagash: The Undying King which I got from a Humble Bundle bunch. It was basically a story about Death/Human team up to repel a Nurgle invasion of Shyish.
I expected to hate it but I thoroughly enjoyed it.