Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
I'm an anarchist, which is technically to the right, but I tend to avoid political discussion because it always descends into "I'm right because I say so,"
Also, I dislike Ayn Rand, but that has little to do with the conversation, I just felt it should be said.
I mean actual anarchy, not the fake "I hate the world, let's burn stuff," anarchy, I mean anarchy as a state in which there is no permanent leadership, instead, leaders are elected as the need arises, and are immediately forced to resign when this crisis or disaster has been solved. There's some other fiddly bits, but that's the gist of it. It would never work in a large country, but it's nice to have ideals.
Love the little oxymoron Monster.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/02/21 21:10:17
Such labels are too broad. I'm 'pretty danged leftist' in terms of ideals, but at the same time, I have some pretty libertarian views of what government should and shouldn't do, and I have very open views when it comes to gun 'control'(that is to say, I'm pretty 'pro-gun').
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/02/21 21:27:04
Wait a Fascist... Anarchist. A Fascist who believes that all regulatory power should reside in the judgement of one organization or in one individual. and an Anarchist believes that the best course to obtain social liberty is to have no government at all. Sir, explain to me how you can have a totalitarian government and no government at all, at the same time.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/02/21 22:38:27
Wait a Fascist... Anarchist. A Fascist who believes that all regulatory power should reside in the judgement of one organization or in one individual. and an Anarchist believes that the best course to obtain social liberty is to have no government at all. Sir, explain to me how you can have a totalitarian government and no government at all.
Wow learn something every day. That actually brings a whole lot of global issues into prospective. A lot of Americans believe our President is an insane Communist and quiet frankly I agree, but if he is considered normal around the EU maybe he is not as crazy as we think although Greece does make Liberalism look bad.
broodstar wrote: A lot of Americans believe our President is an insane Communist and quiet frankly I agree,
I thought he was an insane, communist, socialist, muslim, elitist, illegal alien this week?
I wish people could spend less time making tinfoil hats and maybe draw up a flow chart for Obama's weekly alledged status so we can all stay abreast...
Ummm...
Other?
Left on some things.
Right on others...
Centre on a few things...
Dakka Bingo! By Ouze "You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry.