Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
No, no. Unfortunately, Riddler has been categorically stated by the director as not being in the film. A great pity, but whatever, I guess we'll have to wait for the damage done by Joel Schumacher to be fixed.
Melissia wrote:Stopping power IS a deterrent. The bigger a hole you put in them the more deterred they are.
Waaagh! Gorskar = 2050pts
Iron Warriors VII Company = 1850pts
Fjälnir Ironfist's Great Company = 1800pts
Guflag's Mercenary Ogres = 2000pts
I honestly hope that little part about Angelina Jolie being the Catwoman is a lie........I mean REALLY hope its a lie. Its not that I hate the chick, its more like she seems to ruin films imo
well perhaps (seriously PERHAPS) the "its not the riddler" is merely the groundwork in itself for Viral marketing, if your remember before Dark knight, there was a whole heap of "I Believe in Harvey Dent" kicking around the web, which later had been 'Hacked' and Graffitti'd By 'The Joker', But hey who knows.
Here's a REALLY slowed Idea for a villain: Deadpool.
He turns up (all be it once) in the DC universe, and has a hit on Bruce Wayne,
And seeing how there's a Deadpool movie in the Pipeline...
I'm just here to look at pretty pictures, and be an ass. W/D/L's:
Orks: 4/7/2
(Ex) BT: 1/0/13 <--- OUCH.
Iyanden: 2/0/2
I've thought about this more and more recently and I have started to think that Bane actually can and will work. I can see where Bane's super destructiveness could overwhelm Batman to the point where he breaks both emotionally and physically all while Bruce tries to deal with duality of being attracted to Catwoman and (only a rumor btw) Naomi Watt's character. The stress and weight of the issues involving these 3 things could show Batman really start to lose it and show some character vulnerability that can play into the storiy's themes. Plus I also trust Nolan to do "all that is necessary" to make this a great movie. All in all I will reserve judgment until I see the trailer at least XD.
Shhhhhh...be bwery bwery quiet, I'm huntin' hewetics of the Empewa. Huhuhuhuuu...
One thing to point out here...the movie's title probably isn't an accident. IIRC, Nolan and co. said that "The Dark Knight" intentionally had a dual meaning. Witness Harvey's speech about it being darkest just before the dawn. TDK was about Batman at his lowest and darkest...I suspect TDKR will be more about the "dawn" and end on an up note with more of an ascendent Bruce/Batman.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/01/26 02:51:23
I personally like the newer Batman movies. Sure you can pick them apart, and I personally think Christian Bale has a terrible Batman voice, but Im digging the darker set up. And as Ive said before, Bane is awesome, I think he will fit in nicely.