Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Nice powerfists there, I would love to field those not-valkyries myself but since ATC is hosted not far from where I live and the owner who sometimes get to manage the things know what I do to models, I can't field them for my new guard regiment. Thankfully they do not readily fit my regiments design .

Maybe a kit that can be purchased to give a throw back to either WWI or WWII would be awesome and save me tons of hours devising a scheme to model the wings accordingly, since the majority of my army has to be GW.

They are all left arms...I wonder if we will get right ones too?

I'd imagine it's not too much work to mirror a digital design

Both hands will be available

Presuming they're big enough, they would be great arms for count-as Mutilators, for all those who don't like the GW version. That won't help with the Mutilator rules though :(

Anyone happen to know, would the egyptian heads work good for Necron models, namely lords and immortals? Or are they really just designed to fit with marines?

I was thinking of using the jackal heads for my immortals, and then get the multi-god pack and use 1 for each lord. Worried they would look too "beefy" or take too much carving and stuff to make tem fit right

Another WIP pic of the tank, looks more WW1 now:

Ah you beat me to it.

Yes it is looking great but also not looking like it was going to be what I was hoping for.

Even so, looks like it will be an awesome tank.

Tank is looking good!

I like what I see so far with that tank. I've always felt the Leman Russ wasn't long enough.

I really hope that the right hand side of that pic is the front of it. .or it's going to have problems going over kerbs and pavements!

I'm pretty sure it is. What leads you to believe otherwise?

The right side of the pic is a straight vertical hull piece... more likely to be the back, I would think.

yeah those lugs on the left look like something that a "dozerblade" would be mounted on .

Yeah, they've gone for "40k" tank proportions, which is a shame, since the GW designers have followed on from the early designs, when the artists clearly didn't know a thing about suspension or why tracks are designed the way that they are, instead going for a streamlined "racing car" look - that 40k designs still follow to this day....

Like many GW tanks, it is inspired by the British WW1 tank, so front is on the right side of the Puppet's War pic.
Driving in the other direction with that tracks would give it almost no all-terrain capabilities, stopping the tank at the first trench or wall.

I think the left is the front- but I agree with your analysis, Kroot.

I'm thinking the right side is where the engines will be mounted.

Thunder crow looks nice.
I really appreciate the addition of the windscreen. Nice.

Puppets War wrote:
Both hands will be available

What size miniatures are they meant for?


Also, love the Land Raider-ish shaped vehicle so far, looking forward to seeing more of it.

Sm, they may fit tdas as well.

Is there a possiblity that the flyer will be realeased before xmus?

Also could you put the links to puppes war's homepage in your sig? I would like to just click the link (facebook link would be awesome too) in your sig instead googling "puppets war".

ty in advance

 RiTides wrote:
I think the left is the front- but I agree with your analysis, Kroot.

Seems you were right :

Thats huge , I actually choked when I saw it.

It's... backwards!

Nonono, you guys just don't get it. The low track side is the rear! See, that thing is actually a repeating cannon with a high ROF, making silly things like an engine entirely obsolete! All that's missing is the small calibre machine gun on top. For, you know, offensive capabilities

It went from "Must Buy" status to "Must Avoid" status!

Oh well!

We'll see if any variants are developed using the same chassis. Could still end up having potential.

I kinda like it this way. But I'm a little weird. But this will be a good stand-in for my Iron Warriors.

 Bolognesus wrote:
Nonono, you guys just don't get it. The low track side is the rear! See, that thing is actually a repeating cannon with a high ROF, making silly things like an engine entirely obsolete! All that's missing is the small calibre machine gun on top. For, you know, offensive capabilities

Repeating cannon? No, no, no. It's a massive jet engine. The thing is designed to fly into walls - literally - and break them apart!