Scottywan82 wrote:NAVARRO wrote:So fixing typos is your bright idea of "intellectual discourse"?
Great!
Actually it was a joke. Not that I should have expected you to get it. You can't figure out when a game is dead.
A joke really? For a moment there it looked like it was your ussual blind attitude towards the comunities you attend to...
You say dakka lacks "intellectual discourse" and the users of rackham forum are a "stupid-a$$ bull$gak whiners"... both because they sometimes have a diferent position and opinions towards something.
Thats really a showoff of intelectual maturity you should be very proud of
Funny!
But whats really very funny is that you accuse me of not accepting the game is dead and you are the one not only not accepting but antagonizing, atacking, flaming the current fan majority of displeased people towards rackham... On every chance you get. Everywere. Now thats being intelectuall
Also whats strange and a contradition of your "Kool aid guy" nick name is that you concentraded on making "jokes" about dakka instead of the first good news posted about rackham in a loooong time.
Odd.
Well I feel sorry for those who like to support rackham in a constructive way like sentinels or just fans of PPP and have to deal with you... theres a big diference about being exited about a game and making a pointless internet crusade towards everyone who thinks differently about rackham ways.
I dont know if rackham wouldnt be alot better served without your (and some rarities like you who appeard and disapeard so fast before) negative agenda.
I just want to paint some nice minis and that doest include dealing with you.

ops sorry wrong finger