Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Its just amusing that when the rules can no longer be argued instead people start to argue about the definition of a FAQ and then can turn virtually anything into a RAW debate... even a PDF document

Criticizing the FAQ is fairly irrelevant since it is quite clear on its ruling and its straight from GW

The idea that the FAQs are also "studio house rules" is also straight from GW.

One flaw .. Adepticon FAQ is the official FAQ of GW tournaments (and obviously adepticon).. Since their FAQ uses GW's FAQ it is indeed much more than studio house rules
I have never been to a tournament where the GW FAQs were ignored

Knowing that whatever FAQ GW produces will be followed by a majority of tournaments its irrelevant to argue about its validity because such validity is already assured and proven

willydstyle wrote:It's amazing how on Dakka some people can point out how GW writes bad rules, and then makes up for it by directly contradicting some of the clear rules they've already written, and some players feel that's not worth criticizing... Seriously?

We're nothing if not inconsistent. And argumentative.

Adepticon is the official FAQ for 'Ard Boyz final. It is not the official FAQ for RTTs or necessarily for any future GW tournaments.