Switch Theme:

Texas Dad beats man assaulting his daughter, to death  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Assassin with Black Lotus Poison





Bristol

Orlanth wrote:

PhantomViper wrote: (as if any person would just misinterpret the reason why his child his crying and kill a man he knew over that misunderstanding!)


Actually there is a massive hysteria over 'paedos'. There was a study done in the UK in the last decade where parents were asked to give a percentage to the chance of their kid being a victim of a sexual predator. On average they overestimated the threat by 200x.
People are regularly attacked threatened or victimised because of false testimonies of paedophilia. Its not just out of control kids saying it also. Its a common ploy in criminal communities to smear someone as being a paedo because its the one taboo that is a virtual death sentence if believed.

I knew of a case where a man was living in an estate in my town, he was large and seedy looking so in the eyes of some ignorant idiots that meant he 'must be' a paedo. Some children in the area knew this rumour also. Anyone one evening a teenage girl arrived late home, she had disobeyed dad and not rushed home from school to go to a mates house and play on her playstation. In order to not get into trouble with dad she said she met this man on the way home and evaded him and hid. Dad got angry, phoned a few friends and went around to this mans house. By the time he was finished the victim was lucky to be alive. Later when the girl heard what happened she owned up that it was a lie, after all she was at her friends house and her friends parents knew the truth of the matter.
Nevertheless even though the victim had no child offences to his name nothing happened to the angry dad and AFAIK is still claiming 'the paedo had whats coming' in flat denial rather than face the truth.


Here's another example of the stupidity of people over "paedophiles"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/901723.stm

The Laws of Thermodynamics:
1) You cannot win. 2) You cannot break even. 3) You cannot stop playing the game.

Colonel Flagg wrote:You think you're real smart. But you're not smart; you're dumb. Very dumb. But you've met your match in me.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





St. Louis, MO

You need proof here buddy. A man is dead, if he wants to say he was protecting his girl let him proove it.


actually when someone admits to killing someone and claims to have good reason it pays to check that reason out and demand burden of proof.

How about someone guns down your dad and when the police arrest him says, "yeah I killed PhantomViper's dad, he was a child molester after my kid."
You would be happy for burden of proof to be required then wouldn't you.
there is evidence, he killed him and admitted it. Now we need proof it was justified, not just his word for it.


Generally there is an investigation when someone kills someone else. If there is not enough evidence to convict a person or say overwhelming proof that the killing was indeed justified, then they do not bring charges against that person. You are trying to justify throwing the guy over the coals based on a newspaper article who is most likely not privey to the details of that investigation.

11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die.
++

Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

Maelstrom808 wrote:
You need proof here buddy. A man is dead, if he wants to say he was protecting his girl let him proove it.


actually when someone admits to killing someone and claims to have good reason it pays to check that reason out and demand burden of proof.

How about someone guns down your dad and when the police arrest him says, "yeah I killed PhantomViper's dad, he was a child molester after my kid."
You would be happy for burden of proof to be required then wouldn't you.
there is evidence, he killed him and admitted it. Now we need proof it was justified, not just his word for it.


Generally there is an investigation when someone kills someone else. If there is not enough evidence to convict a person or say overwhelming proof that the killing was indeed justified, then they do not bring charges against that person. You are trying to justify throwing the guy over the coals based on a newspaper article who is most likely not privey to the details of that investigation.


Whereas Frazz and associates are saying that the murder was 100% justified based on the same incomplete newspaper article.
   
Made in us
Stubborn Hammerer





As the official watch report would say, "he committed suicide."
   
Made in gb
Highlord with a Blackstone Fortress






Adrift within the vortex of my imagination.

Maelstrom808 wrote:
You need proof here buddy. A man is dead, if he wants to say he was protecting his girl let him proove it.


actually when someone admits to killing someone and claims to have good reason it pays to check that reason out and demand burden of proof.

How about someone guns down your dad and when the police arrest him says, "yeah I killed PhantomViper's dad, he was a child molester after my kid."
You would be happy for burden of proof to be required then wouldn't you.
there is evidence, he killed him and admitted it. Now we need proof it was justified, not just his word for it.


Generally there is an investigation when someone kills someone else. If there is not enough evidence to convict a person or say overwhelming proof that the killing was indeed justified, then they do not bring charges against that person. You are trying to justify throwing the guy over the coals based on a newspaper article who is most likely not privey to the details of that investigation.


A fair point, but thenwe are open to being convinced by the evidence, or more accurately we hope Law enforcement in Texas are open to being convinced on the evidence.
However Corpsesarefun has it right. Too many here are assuming that the killing is justified due to the alleged status of the victim without subjecting the case to the scrutiny an investigation into the killing of a man deserves.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/12 15:26:22


n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.

It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





St. Louis, MO

Corpsesarefun wrote:
Maelstrom808 wrote:
You need proof here buddy. A man is dead, if he wants to say he was protecting his girl let him proove it.


actually when someone admits to killing someone and claims to have good reason it pays to check that reason out and demand burden of proof.

How about someone guns down your dad and when the police arrest him says, "yeah I killed PhantomViper's dad, he was a child molester after my kid."
You would be happy for burden of proof to be required then wouldn't you.
there is evidence, he killed him and admitted it. Now we need proof it was justified, not just his word for it.


Generally there is an investigation when someone kills someone else. If there is not enough evidence to convict a person or say overwhelming proof that the killing was indeed justified, then they do not bring charges against that person. You are trying to justify throwing the guy over the coals based on a newspaper article who is most likely not privey to the details of that investigation.


Whereas Frazz and associates are saying that the murder was 100% justified based on the same incomplete newspaper article.



Lavaca County Sheriff Micah Harmon said the father, whose name has not been released, is unlikely to be arrested for Saturday's killing and that no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story.

Pretty much supports that Frazz and associates are right.





Automatically Appended Next Post:
Orlanth wrote:
Maelstrom808 wrote:
You need proof here buddy. A man is dead, if he wants to say he was protecting his girl let him proove it.


actually when someone admits to killing someone and claims to have good reason it pays to check that reason out and demand burden of proof.

How about someone guns down your dad and when the police arrest him says, "yeah I killed PhantomViper's dad, he was a child molester after my kid."
You would be happy for burden of proof to be required then wouldn't you.
there is evidence, he killed him and admitted it. Now we need proof it was justified, not just his word for it.


Generally there is an investigation when someone kills someone else. If there is not enough evidence to convict a person or say overwhelming proof that the killing was indeed justified, then they do not bring charges against that person. You are trying to justify throwing the guy over the coals based on a newspaper article who is most likely not privey to the details of that investigation.


A fair point, but thenwe are open to being convinced by the evidence, or more accurately we hope Law enforcement in Texas are open to being convinced on the evidence.
However Corpsesarefun has it right. Too many here are assuming that the killing is justified due to the alleged status of the victim without subjecting the case to the scrutiny an investigation into the killing of a man deserves.


Absolutely, you have to put faith that the investigators are doing a fair and unbiased investigation. If someone feels otherwise, they are certainly free to try and bring a case against them. Much like currency, if you don't have faith in the justice system, the whole thing falls apart. That said, it is entirely possible that they are biased and are influencing the the investigation based on that bias, but unless someone can show proof of that, you have to assume that they are being impartial.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/12 15:31:04


11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die.
++

Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless.
 
   
Made in gb
Oberstleutnant





Back in the English morass

Frazzled wrote:

Oh I get you now. This is a legal term.
In Texas the legal crime is not "rape." The term is now "sexual assault." I see why you're not understanding now.


Does sexual assault definately mean rape? In the UK it has lots of meaning ranging from inappropriate touching to full blown sodomy. I'm not sure on the more serious examples but it is certainly a widely used term that seems to cover a lot of activities.

RegalPhantom wrote:
If your fluff doesn't fit, change your fluff until it does
The prefect example of someone missing the point.
Do not underestimate the Squats. They survived for millenia cut off from the Imperium and assailed on all sides. Their determination and resilience is an example to us all.
-Leman Russ, Meditations on Imperial Command book XVI (AKA the RT era White Dwarf Commpendium).
Its just a shame that they couldn't fight off Andy Chambers.
Warzone Plog 
   
Made in gb
Highlord with a Blackstone Fortress






Adrift within the vortex of my imagination.

Maelstrom808 wrote:
Lavaca County Sheriff Micah Harmon said the father, whose name has not been released, is unlikely to be arrested for Saturday's killing and that no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story.

Pretty much supports that Frazz and associates are right.


If Frazzie and associates are right its only by accident.

It wont be the first time police haven't looked very hard at a case because they like the idea of a 'paedo' getting their comeuppance. It wont be the first time the victim denied justice wasn't actually a paedo.
IF the father can convince the police via the evidence and IF that counts as self defence under the law then so be it.

Still we can only hope they are doing their job properly.

n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.

It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. 
   
Made in gb
Oberstleutnant





Back in the English morass

Maelstrom808 wrote:
Lavaca County Sheriff Micah Harmon said the father, whose name has not been released, is unlikely to be arrested for Saturday's killing and that no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story.

Pretty much supports that Frazz and associates are right.



On the other hand that statement doesn't actually support his story either.

RegalPhantom wrote:
If your fluff doesn't fit, change your fluff until it does
The prefect example of someone missing the point.
Do not underestimate the Squats. They survived for millenia cut off from the Imperium and assailed on all sides. Their determination and resilience is an example to us all.
-Leman Russ, Meditations on Imperial Command book XVI (AKA the RT era White Dwarf Commpendium).
Its just a shame that they couldn't fight off Andy Chambers.
Warzone Plog 
   
Made in gb
Bane Knight




Inverness, Scotland.

Palindrome wrote:
Frazzled wrote:

Oh I get you now. This is a legal term.
In Texas the legal crime is not "rape." The term is now "sexual assault." I see why you're not understanding now.


Does sexual assault definately mean rape? In the UK it has lots of meaning ranging from inappropriate touching to full blown sodomy. I'm not sure on the more serious examples but it is certainly a widely used term that seems to cover a lot of activities.

Perhaps it is a broad term covering varying degrees such as those you mentioned, as is the case with violent assault?
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





St. Louis, MO

Palindrome wrote:
Maelstrom808 wrote:
Lavaca County Sheriff Micah Harmon said the father, whose name has not been released, is unlikely to be arrested for Saturday's killing and that no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story.

Pretty much supports that Frazz and associates are right.



On the other hand that statement doesn't actually support his story either.


Whaaaa?

"no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story"

In other words, from what they have seen so far, the evidence supports his story.

11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die.
++

Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

RossDas wrote:
Palindrome wrote:
Frazzled wrote:

Oh I get you now. This is a legal term.
In Texas the legal crime is not "rape." The term is now "sexual assault." I see why you're not understanding now.


Does sexual assault definately mean rape? In the UK it has lots of meaning ranging from inappropriate touching to full blown sodomy. I'm not sure on the more serious examples but it is certainly a widely used term that seems to cover a lot of activities.

Perhaps it is a broad term covering varying degrees such as those you mentioned, as is the case with violent assault?


It is, however rape is a separate charge and is not included with sexual assault.
   
Made in gb
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator





Glasgow

Corpsesarefun wrote:If he walked in on someone molesting or raping his daughter then, while I can fully empathise with him (I'd certainly beat the fether to death if it were me), from an objective point of view he should have disabled/restrained the assailant, made sure his daughter was in no further danger and called the police.


What father would react like that?

Actually there is a massive hysteria over 'paedos'.


Probably has something to do with releasing them into the community when their short sentences are done and not giving a good indication of where they are...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/12 15:45:42


 
   
Made in gb
Oberstleutnant





Back in the English morass

Maelstrom808 wrote:

On the other hand that statement doesn't actually support his story either.


Whaaaa?

"no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story"

In other words, from what they have seen so far, the evidence supports his story.


The statement is neutral. Not casting doubt is not the same as supporting.

RegalPhantom wrote:
If your fluff doesn't fit, change your fluff until it does
The prefect example of someone missing the point.
Do not underestimate the Squats. They survived for millenia cut off from the Imperium and assailed on all sides. Their determination and resilience is an example to us all.
-Leman Russ, Meditations on Imperial Command book XVI (AKA the RT era White Dwarf Commpendium).
Its just a shame that they couldn't fight off Andy Chambers.
Warzone Plog 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

Mr Hyena wrote:
Corpsesarefun wrote:If he walked in on someone molesting or raping his daughter then, while I can fully empathise with him (I'd certainly beat the fether to death if it were me), from an objective point of view he should have disabled/restrained the assailant, made sure his daughter was in no further danger and called the police.


What father would react like that?

Actually there is a massive hysteria over 'paedos'.


Probably has something to do with releasing them into the community when their short sentences are done and not giving a good indication of where they are...


Other than being on the sex offenders register that, to my knowledge, lists the names and current address of all convicted paedophiles.
   
Made in gb
Oberstleutnant





Back in the English morass

He wants their details plastered all over the taboids so he can have a real lynch mob.

RegalPhantom wrote:
If your fluff doesn't fit, change your fluff until it does
The prefect example of someone missing the point.
Do not underestimate the Squats. They survived for millenia cut off from the Imperium and assailed on all sides. Their determination and resilience is an example to us all.
-Leman Russ, Meditations on Imperial Command book XVI (AKA the RT era White Dwarf Commpendium).
Its just a shame that they couldn't fight off Andy Chambers.
Warzone Plog 
   
Made in gb
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator





Glasgow

Perhaps the fear over them would lesson if it was made much more public where they are. Lets you know who to watch out for.

He wants their details plastered all over the taboids so he can have a real lynch mob.


Preventing the inevitable re-offending from occurring by watching Them carefully is better than having to deal with the after effects of child abuse...

But really, it depends on if you want to reduce the number of lives hurt by paedos or enable them.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/06/12 15:54:00


 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard





St. Louis, MO

Palindrome wrote:
Maelstrom808 wrote:
Palindrome wrote:

On the other hand that statement doesn't actually support his story either.


Whaaaa?

"no evidence so far has led investigators to doubt his story"

In other words, from what they have seen so far, the evidence supports his story.


The statement is neutral. Not casting doubt is not the same as supporting.


Maybe so, I'll give you that, but when the burden of proof is on you to supply evidence on someone's alleged wrong-doing, not casting doubt on a story is just about as good as supporting.

11,100 pts, 7,000 pts
++ Heed my words for I am the Herald and we are the footsteps of doom. Interlopers, do we name you. Defilers of our
sacred earth. We have awoken to your primative species and will not tolerate your presence. Ours is the way of logic,
of cold hard reason: your irrationality, your human disease has no place in the necrontyr. Flesh is weak.
Surrender to the machine incarnate. Surrender and die.
++

Tuagh wrote: If you won't use a wrench, it isn't the bolt's fault that your hammer is useless.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

Mr Hyena wrote:Perhaps the fear over them would lesson if it was made much more public where they are. Lets you know who to watch out for.

He wants their details plastered all over the taboids so he can have a real lynch mob.


Preventing the inevitable re-offending from occurring by watching Them carefully is better than having to deal with the after effects of child abuse...

But really, it depends on if you want to reduce the number of lives hurt by paedos or enable them.


Again, their names and addresses ARE public knowledge.
   
Made in us
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)




The Great State of Texas

Corpsesarefun wrote:
Maelstrom808 wrote:
You need proof here buddy. A man is dead, if he wants to say he was protecting his girl let him proove it.


actually when someone admits to killing someone and claims to have good reason it pays to check that reason out and demand burden of proof.

How about someone guns down your dad and when the police arrest him says, "yeah I killed PhantomViper's dad, he was a child molester after my kid."
You would be happy for burden of proof to be required then wouldn't you.
there is evidence, he killed him and admitted it. Now we need proof it was justified, not just his word for it.


Generally there is an investigation when someone kills someone else. If there is not enough evidence to convict a person or say overwhelming proof that the killing was indeed justified, then they do not bring charges against that person. You are trying to justify throwing the guy over the coals based on a newspaper article who is most likely not privey to the details of that investigation.


Whereas Frazz and associates are saying that the murder was 100% justified based on the same incomplete newspaper article.


No charges so yea.

-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

No charges so far.

God it's almost like you need to take time to construct a full picture of a scenario before casting absolute judgement...
   
Made in us
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)




The Great State of Texas

RossDas wrote:
Palindrome wrote:
Frazzled wrote:

Oh I get you now. This is a legal term.
In Texas the legal crime is not "rape." The term is now "sexual assault." I see why you're not understanding now.


Does sexual assault definately mean rape? In the UK it has lots of meaning ranging from inappropriate touching to full blown sodomy. I'm not sure on the more serious examples but it is certainly a widely used term that seems to cover a lot of activities.

Perhaps it is a broad term covering varying degrees such as those you mentioned, as is the case with violent assault?


Well in actuality "assault" as in battery would have the same defense. Strangely, you can't batter children either...


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Corpsesarefun wrote:No charges so far.

God it's almost like you need to take time to construct a full picture of a scenario before casting absolute judgement...


The event happened on the 9th. We're not talking CSI here. If he's not charged now he won't be.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/12 16:12:53


-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
 
   
Made in us
Member of the Ethereal Council






4 yr old? Ugh, I feel my lunch coming up. thats sick.
And if that was my girl/niece. i might have lost it too and killed the guy aswell

5000pts 6000pts 3000pts
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






Corpsesarefun wrote:
Mr Hyena wrote:
Corpsesarefun wrote:If he walked in on someone molesting or raping his daughter then, while I can fully empathise with him (I'd certainly beat the fether to death if it were me), from an objective point of view he should have disabled/restrained the assailant, made sure his daughter was in no further danger and called the police.


What father would react like that?

Actually there is a massive hysteria over 'paedos'.


Probably has something to do with releasing them into the community when their short sentences are done and not giving a good indication of where they are...


Other than being on the sex offenders register that, to my knowledge, lists the names and current address of all convicted paedophiles.


Just a small correction, since your post is a shining example of how people misunderstand the sex offender registry:

The registers list the name and current address of all convicted sex offenders.

Sex offender is a very different term than paedophiles. It's the whole square rectangle thing. While all convicted paedophiles might be sex offenders, not all sex offenders are convicted paedophiles. Flashers, streakers, people who hire prostitutes, and sometimes even people convicted of public urination are all on the sex offenders list, right up along side those convicted of rape, bestiality, sexual assault and the like. In some states, even people convicted of sodomy end up on the sex offender registration.
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Chicago

How about we all take a moment and send our thoughts and prayers to this poor girl, rather than arguing back and forth over sex offender registries.

She was horribly traumatized by first a terrible, terrible act by a despicable human being, and then again by watching her father beat a man to death in front of her.

Whether or not her father's actions were justifiable, the entire incident would be very troubling to a 4-year-old, who wouldn't really understand the nuances of what happened.

On behalf of all of us, I'd like to wish her a speedy and thorough recovery.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/12 16:20:06


6000pts

DS:80S++G++M-B-I+Pw40k98-D++A++/areWD-R+T(D)DM+

What do Humans know of our pain? We have sung songs of lament since before your ancestors crawled on their bellies from the sea.

Join the fight against the zombie horde! 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

Very true, that doesn't change the fact that people ARE given a good indication of where said convicted paedophiles are.

and @Frazz, really? 3 days is enough time to totally close a case like that?
   
Made in us
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator




Ephrata, PA

hotsauceman1 wrote:
i might have lost it too and killed the guy aswell


Its really hard to read that, look at your avatar, and not giggle a bit.

But I just see this as spinning wheels, hes not going to jail. And objective thinking about what he should have done is pointless. If you have kids and something like that happened, you wouldn't sit there and think it through.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/12 16:23:20


Bane's P&M Blog, pop in and leave a comment
3100+

 feeder wrote:
Frazz's mind is like a wiener dog in a rabbit warren. Dark, twisting tunnels, and full of the certainty that just around the next bend will be the quarry he seeks.

 
   
Made in gb
Ancient Ultramarine Venerable Dreadnought





UK

I've always supported capital punishment until I read this thread, now I'm having second thoughts.

Basically people want to act like fething Afghan goat herders as soon as their blood is up. At this rate there wouldn't be anyone left alive by 2018.

The bloke should have been arrested, charged, found guilty in a court and THEN been beaten to death.

And beating someone to death isn't easy by the way, who was the guy who said it was a few pages back? And has he EVER been in a proper fight? Ive been wrapped over the head with all sorts, I got knocked out with a sock full of snooker balls, mashed over the head 4 times with 3 cricket stumps taped together, and then booted all over a street by a gang when I was 15, and I was alright to go on the piss the next day once they stitched my crust back together.

If you fething kick a man to death, you have to seriously go to town. Even I would have a sweat on and I can run a 10k in 38 minutes.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/06/12 16:36:24


We are arming Syrian rebels who support ISIS, who is fighting Iran, who is fighting Iraq who we also support against ISIS, while fighting Kurds who we support while they are fighting Syrian rebels.  
   
Made in gb
Renegade Inquisitor de Marche






Elephant Graveyard

mattyrm wrote:I've always supported capital punishment until I read this thread, now I'm having second thoughts.

Basically people want to act like fething Afghan goat herders as soon as their blood is up. At this rate there wouldn't be anyone left alive by 2018.

The bloke should have been arrested, charged, found guilty in a court and THEN been beaten to death.

And beating someone to death isn't easy by the way, who was the guy who said it was a few pages back? And has he EVER been in a proper fight? Ive been wrapped over the head with all sorts, I got knocked out with a sock full of snooker balls, mashed over the head 4 times with 3 cricket stumps taped together, and then booted all over a street by a gang when I was 15, and I was alright to go on the piss the next day once they stitched my crust back together.

If you fething kick a man to death, you have to seriously go to town. Even I would have a sweat on and I can run a 10k in 38 minutes.

I've had unconfirmed reports regarding your mortality...

Dakka Bingo! By Ouze
"You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry. 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Swindon, Wiltshire, UK

purplefood wrote:
mattyrm wrote:I've always supported capital punishment until I read this thread, now I'm having second thoughts.

Basically people want to act like fething Afghan goat herders as soon as their blood is up. At this rate there wouldn't be anyone left alive by 2018.

The bloke should have been arrested, charged, found guilty in a court and THEN been beaten to death.

And beating someone to death isn't easy by the way, who was the guy who said it was a few pages back? And has he EVER been in a proper fight? Ive been wrapped over the head with all sorts, I got knocked out with a sock full of snooker balls, mashed over the head 4 times with 3 cricket stumps taped together, and then booted all over a street by a gang when I was 15, and I was alright to go on the piss the next day once they stitched my crust back together.

If you fething kick a man to death, you have to seriously go to town. Even I would have a sweat on and I can run a 10k in 38 minutes.

I've had unconfirmed reports regarding your mortality...


This.

My respect for matty has increase greatly in this thread Ignoring the sprinklings of racism he drops into each post.
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: