rigeld2 wrote:Note that this sentence isn't referring to the Str10 ID thing that I apologized for, it's referring to the identical list statement. It seems like you crossed the two.
I didn't cross the two, though I didn't make the sentence clear enough; let me rephrase that as 'when the first poster accused me of saying something I didn't say'. My point being I've been very careful in what I said, so I know what I did and didn't imply.
rigeld2 wrote:Not being at the peak of cost efficiency doesn't mean it's not a competitive choice, as it seems you're asserting.
I didn't say anything about the peak of cost efficiency. True some things are more cost efficient than others, but the point is he isn't cost efficient at all and so isn't a competitive choice. You may have a different opinion, but I'd wager most competitive player would not rate a unit competitive if they could do the same thing with a much cheaper unit.
rigeld2 wrote:http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/preList/485975/4949521.page
That post was in response to you, it was directed at you. You ignored it and Zebio responded. Therefore you haven't responded to my point, as I said.
Okay. Now point out to me where in that post of mine I said Sisters of Battle were competitive.
I ignored it because at first I didn't feel like it was worth responding to, no offense. The fact is I said after we get the results of several tournaments together we'll see what's good and what isn't, and you tried to invalidate that with hyperbole by saying one single tournament doesn't show anything, which is not what I had said clearly. As far as I'm concerned doing this isn't an argument, so I ignored it the first time.
So when you respond to the post I actually made, i.e. multiple tournament results, then I'll respond to yours. That seems fair to me.