Switch Theme:

GW new releases getting bland?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Hardened Veteran Guardsman






Hiding in a ruined Chimera

 Medium of Death wrote:
I think we always see the community shine when it comes to the more mundane GW releases.


I see your point, however i dont expect to pay over twice the amount of money for a 40k plastic tank than i would pay for a Resin and Metal historical tank and then have too convert to make it look nice

Cadian 7th Regiment (Desert uniform) 550pts 2/0/0
WoC army 1000pts 1/0/0

 mattyrm wrote:
Yeah, I don't have PTSD after five combat tours, and frankly I'd rather get parachuted back into Helmand province armed with only a fething Nerf gun and my underpants than go into my local GW.
 
   
Made in gb
Lit By the Flames of Prospero





Rampton, UK

For me they are not really bland, I think just adding a huge model to each army is a bit of a cash grab but thats what we should expect.
I dont see how bringing out updated stuff predictably each month can be anything but a good thing, it could be so much worse.
   
Made in au
Hacking Proxy Mk.1





Australia

Back to that conversion for a sec, the head and extra tail stuff looks like it's from the forgefiend kit.

*Edit*
Also you can't tell me this doesn't scream "We only put 30 seconds of thought into this concept".

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/06/03 03:50:33


 Fafnir wrote:
Oh, I certainly vote with my dollar, but the problem is that that is not enough. The problem with the 'vote with your dollar' response is that it doesn't take into account why we're not buying the product. I want to enjoy 40k enough to buy back in. It was my introduction to traditional games, and there was a time when I enjoyed it very much. I want to buy 40k, but Gamesworkshop is doing their very best to push me away, and simply not buying their product won't tell them that.
 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







 jonolikespie wrote:
Also you can't tell me this doesn't scream "We only put 30 seconds of thought into this concept".
Spoiler:


I, for one, like he fact they're using Epic designs as a base for Apocalypse kits, even if there are some elements (such as the head) which I don't think work.

Bring on the Silver Towers of Tzeentch!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/03 05:57:48


2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in gb
Hardened Veteran Guardsman






Hiding in a ruined Chimera

 jonolikespie wrote:
Back to that conversion for a sec, the head and extra tail stuff looks like it's from the forgefiend kit.

*Edit*
Also you can't tell me this doesn't scream "We only put 30 seconds of thought into this concept".

Wow havent seen that yet! Hope they have some different apoc stuff in there - but i wouldnt mind large epic things, because they have been around for over a decade. However i do see your point, looking into it, it does seem, well, bland.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/06/03 17:36:48


Cadian 7th Regiment (Desert uniform) 550pts 2/0/0
WoC army 1000pts 1/0/0

 mattyrm wrote:
Yeah, I don't have PTSD after five combat tours, and frankly I'd rather get parachuted back into Helmand province armed with only a fething Nerf gun and my underpants than go into my local GW.
 
   
Made in us
Dangerous Leadbelcher




 curran12 wrote:
I have a feeling that GW could include a free puppy and handjob with a new codex release and people would find some way to whine about that as well.

Not excusing GW's mistakes, mind you, but seriously, it is a seamless shift from "why does GW update so slowwww!" to "these quick regular updates are too predictableeee!"


If it hasn't already been said: I am allergic to dogs. So I want to whine about GW's new codex!
   
Made in us
Thinking of Joining a Davinite Loge




 Just Dave wrote:
H.B.M.C. wrote:I never called it bland.


I was referring to the thread title.

H.B.M.C. wrote:Why would you want releases to be slower?


Slower releases appears to equate to more in-depth releases; with greater changes and more stuff: what I suspect he meant by more "dynamic".


Do you think they are only working on one project at a time? There was a good 8 months when nothing was released for fantasy. Now every two months something is coming out. I believe it has more to do with their law suit with chapter house. Don't make rules for a model that you don't have an actual model available. Now they are not putting out rules for models that don't exist.

[/sarcasm] 
   
Made in de
Fresh-Faced New User





I feel the same. The new Eldar models look kind of generic and uncreative. The Wrathguard just got an update that did not change much, which is ok. But the flyer and the Wrathknight just look boring to me. The flyer looks just like a modern fighter plane only a bit more curved and the Wrathknight looks like an upscaled Guardian. They look like the designers where just working to rule and where not really invested.

Its creativity is what made GW great. The reason why I play 40k instead of another game that would cost me much less money is that I love the models and the 40k universe. But when I think over it, most the stuff that caught me was introduced in the 90s, and actually GW is mostly feasting on its old ideas since then.
   
Made in us
Douglas Bader






 jonolikespie wrote:
Also you can't tell me this doesn't scream "We only put 30 seconds of thought into this concept".


To be fair, the artists could have spent a lot of time deliberately planning how to make the ugliest possible model. Making something as bad as that take a lot of effort you know.

There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices. 
   
Made in au
Hacking Proxy Mk.1





Australia

 Peregrine wrote:
 jonolikespie wrote:
Also you can't tell me this doesn't scream "We only put 30 seconds of thought into this concept".


To be fair, the artists could have spent a lot of time deliberately planning how to make the ugliest possible model. Making something as bad as that take a lot of effort you know.


Very true.

 Fafnir wrote:
Oh, I certainly vote with my dollar, but the problem is that that is not enough. The problem with the 'vote with your dollar' response is that it doesn't take into account why we're not buying the product. I want to enjoy 40k enough to buy back in. It was my introduction to traditional games, and there was a time when I enjoyed it very much. I want to buy 40k, but Gamesworkshop is doing their very best to push me away, and simply not buying their product won't tell them that.
 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: