Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Here is the deal. I am scratch building a titan that looks like it is half way between an old armorcast warhound titan, and a new "wolf" class Forgeworld warhound. Basically, it has a domed carapace, but it is all angular. With this in mind I have run into a snag. I made the shoulders hang off the carapace as much as I could without making it look silly, but it doesn't leave much room for the arm weapons to turn.
One option I thought of to make the arms narrower is to mount the barrels of the guns in an over-under configuration ( like a dreadnought's lascannons) instead of side-by side.
Does anyone think tis would look silly, or is it okay?

it's just as logical and gives no unfair game advantage, so i can't see anyone complaining

should be great, i wanna see some pics

sleazy wrote:should be great, i wanna see some pics

I don't see why anyone would have an objection to this.

We still want pictures though

Well, I tried the over-under configuration for the weapon barrels. It's not that it looked bad.... it just stopped lookign like a Warhound. It looked more Mechwarrior. I guess I will stick to the side-by-side mounts.