Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 12:21:05
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
Eastern PA
|
I was thinking about it last night. Do you prefer to have a generic army (Meaning you could use it as any other type of army like having marines but using CSM rules) or do you prefer to have a brand name army (Ultramarines, World Eaters, Bad Moons, etc)
Having done both I prefer the latter. I used to play a generic CSM army (Steel Cobra paint scheme). I played with the old Iron Warriors rules. BUt I got tired of explaining what I played. Now my armies are anything but generic. I have a Death Guard and World Eaters army. So what do you prefer and why?
|
Click and help my baby daemon! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 14:28:17
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
I'm generally attracted to an army because I like it's fluff, theme, aesthetic(sp?), or any combination of the three. As such I generally keep to those, so Brand Name for me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 14:49:24
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Flashy Flashgitz
|
I like lots of flexibility. If people don't know what my army is, it's not really my problem.
|
The age of man is over; the time of the Ork has come. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 14:55:05
Subject: Re:Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge
|
I generally prefer generic myself. Part of the fun of creating your own SM chapter, IG regiment or whatever is writing fluff for them. It gets a bit annoying if you turn up to a GW or gaming club for a game and you end up facing off against the same 'brand name' army you have...he says after collecting Space Wolves, Crimson Fists, Death Korps and starting Alpha Legion...Don't listen to me.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 14:58:06
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I'm sort of in between. I don't particularly care about the paint scheme, but the models should match the codex. If you want pink plague marines, fine with me as long as the models are plague marines. If you want purple templars, fine with me as long as they look like loyalist marines. If you want to play Tau and use Space Marines models, gtfo.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 15:23:25
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Foxy Wildborne
|
Techboss wrote:I'm sort of in between. I don't particularly care about the paint scheme, but the models should match the codex. If you want pink plague marines, fine with me as long as the models are plague marines. If you want purple templars, fine with me as long as they look like loyalist marines. If you want to play Tau and use Space Marines models, gtfo.
What he said.
I should also add that I hate it when people use the same models with a different Codex every game, or swap traits, etc. The point of a homebrew army is to have a unique and characterful force, not to be able to pick the best rules for the occasion.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/08 15:26:27
The old meta is dead and the new meta struggles to be born. Now is the time of munchkins. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 15:25:29
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
Actually that better sums up my point of view than I did.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 15:26:20
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Yeah, I agree with the statements that the army should at least fit with what overall group it belongs in. My Shadow Hawk space marines are Loyalist, and they look the part. But I can use the Marine book, BA list, or DA list depending on the type of army I am fielding.
I am not a fan of people trying to have an army that uses Chaos rules, regular rules, and sometimes even Ork rules all with the same army!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 15:29:46
Subject: Re:Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Nigel Stillman
|
I play IG and LatD, so obviously my army is a bit on the generic side.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 19:11:13
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
As my avatar shoes, I play grey marines, like Jervis. I like the freedom to move between Codices as I choose.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 20:02:41
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
Tyranids had no brand and my new army is space sharks, a second founding of ravenguard. I'm likely to simply use vanilla marines with Shrike until something more fitting (if something more fitting) ever comes along.
I'm pretty happy with the lot my armies in now. It actually feels personalized and special, despite being a "generic" marine force.
|
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 20:06:33
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Ultramarine Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
I voted 'other' because I don't think it matters. Just don't put down your Chaos Annihilation Force and then tell me it's Deathwing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 20:21:45
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Hehe obviously you have never seen the Lust Wing on "From the Warp" Oni! I would be thrilled to see the Deathwing in Chaos Clothing hit the table
Personally, I am a tad set with my armies. Sisters of Battle are pretty much nothing but, though I had been tempted to say they were Vulcan marines. My space marines are as they are, and Chaos isn't interesting enough for me to use them as counts as.
I do have a counts as Orks lost and the damned army in the works, but they are going to be so different that they won't be moonlighting as anything else. Anything else than they are already pretending to be at least.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 21:42:38
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
CNY
|
I like the following things in my opponents:
1. That they have their miniatures at least primed (but exceptions can be made, i.e. I just put this kit together while I was waiting for you, it's wintertime and there's no where for me to prime, etc).
2. That the curtains match the carpet - you're using the models that are attached to the codex, or at least close to it. If Blood Angels are using the SM codex as red marines, minimal complaint; if the blood angels are being used as the troop choices for a CSM army - no.
3. That anything that is not WYSIWYG is spelled out for me before we start. If your guardsman has a grenade launcher in his hand and you don't yet own the plasma gun version, let me know and I can roll with it. Don't tell me, and you've got a ten point grenade launcher.
|
STAND FAST AND DIE LIKE GUARDSMEN |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 21:57:02
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
Ontario
|
It rather depends on the Army. I run Greenwing Dark Angels but use the SM Codex rules because unless you are taking squads of 5 with plasma in a razorback, the SM Codex rules are better. And I can even represent some of the characters and traits of the chapter using the Vannilla marines options.
|
DCDA:90-S++G+++MB++I+Pw40k98-D+++A+++/areWD007R++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/08 23:45:30
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I play my own chapters.
I like the variety of being able to use a different rules set for each game.
Also, with the way that GW constantly changes the rules and the fluff, you have to deal with people trying to tell you that you're not fielding a proper 'x' army (Ultramarine, Blood Angels, Dark Angels, etc).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/09 04:42:08
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I like the generic stuff. It gives you way more flexibility with what you can do with your army, and if the fluff on a named army changes you can just slide on by.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/09 04:43:48
Subject: Do you prefer your army to be generic or brand named?
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
Georgia,just outside Atlanta
|
I play Death Guard and Goff Orkz.
For my Death Guard I play to fluff, sqauds of 7,minimal transport,no foot slogger draging around a lascannon,etc.
My Orkz are a bit more flexible as I have included some lootaz&such,however i've stayed very Goff themed as I use LOADS of boys with slugga/choppa combo + lots of Nobz.
With me WYSIWYG.
|
"I'll tell you one thing that every good soldier knows! The only thing that counts in the end is power! Naked merciless force!" .-Ursus.
 I am Red/Black Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I am both selfish and chaotic. I value self-gratification and control; I want to have things my way, preferably now. At best, I'm entertaining and surprising; at worst, I'm hedonistic and violent. |
|
 |
 |
|