Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2010/09/19 23:15:43
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (SEP 18 - Siege Gun preview - pg9)
I know I would, but I don't play in tournaments.
Many persons will choose the parent company before the alternative if it's the same price, disregarding the quality.
Do we have an ETA on this beauty?
2010/09/20 21:50:44
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (SEP 18 - Siege Gun preview - pg9)
Got to admit that pricing this kit may be tricky. I may worry a tad where it's not needed as I still don't know final costs, only estimated ones, but I doubt it will be much cheaper than similar FW piece.
Simply put I'll rather leave it on a shelf rather than sell withou getting some $$$ . And let's not start profit by quantity debate - it won't apply to this one. Quality resin kits are rather expensive on the labor required side.
Without distribution it wouldn't be a pain, but I simply don't want to make it webstore exclusive.
But the idea of selling just the gun as one more kit, without platform looks like a good one - that may be a solution. Thx mates .
Anyways I hope may worries will be out of place .
This time unusual update - as we're unsure about this release. It's something Robert and Hamster52 were working for quite a time.
There's one more head that is fully mechanical. The question is - should we release it? Due to size and number of parts (see below) it will be propably rather expensive :/ . The second quesstion is should we make legs for the rider sculpted on the saddle?
And just to have a laugh here's a precast in all its colorful glory Of course if it makes into production it will be cast in regular grey resin
Looks tops IMHO, and I'm sure that some cunning SW player will find a use...
Padre^.
"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm
2010/10/01 14:37:52
Subject: Re:MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (OCT 1 - Mechanised Wolf prev - pg10)
Honestly, I don't think it's as nice as some of the alternatives out there. I think you'd be better off leaving it for now, and perhaps coming back to it, depending on what GW and FW do with their own attempt.
Not that it's "too-hideous-to-buy" or anything. It's fine. It's just not head and shoulders above anyone else's, and the book is a year old now, s the hype has receded. If it's expensive to produce, I don't think you'd see a real return.
2010/10/01 15:09:28
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (OCT 1 - Mechanised Wolf prev - pg10)
Partially agree with you. It's a tad late - that's why I've asked about your opinion . The only reason I'm thinking about releasing it is because I think Robert and Hamster did a great job and also because I don't see much competition on this field .
Maybe sabre tooth looking fangs... I always thought the giant wolf thing should be improved upon.. tusks and it would look too orky or Boar-ish, but sabre tooths would be cool. Also, the mane makes it look like a lion as well>? just some thoughts.
I like it, too, especially the face which is Fenrisian rather than Terran. Even GW seems to have missed that distinction, so I have to say I like yours better than Canis's mount. Not so sure I like the "hairless" body, however, and the mane would need some touch up before I'd seriously consider buying. The general size and posture are very nice.
Przemas wrote:Partially agree with you. It's a tad late - that's why I've asked about your opinion . The only reason I'm thinking about releasing it is because I think Robert and Hamster did a great job and also because I don't see much competition on this field .
It's a nicely sculpted figure, for certain. But I'd say my worries are that it's only one pose, fairly static, and you'd really need to see a marine on it to know whether or not it will sell.
And as far as competition, there are one, two, three (and they have two different ones), four that I found with just a quick google search.
The second link (set of 5) I considered picking up.
If you want it to fly out the door, I'd say the three things you'd need are:
- multiple poses
- sculpted legs for the rider (as you suggested)
- and plenty of final pictures showing how it looks all assembled, so the buyer has a clear picture of what they will look like on the battlefield.
For bonus points, I would love to see a thunderwolf set that included an arm gripping the wolf's mane - similar to the new boar boyz models. That would be amazing, and a big step up from the other sets.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/10/01 16:56:34
2010/10/01 17:36:15
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (OCT 1 - Mechanised Wolf prev - pg10)
@Scottywan82 : it will sound a tad arrogant but I consider neither of those linked as a competition. IMO none of them is a cool sculpt (maybe with the exception of a MAS one, but it's not mechanical, but a very cool giant wolf).
I'm pretty sure we'll match at least 2 of the points you've mentioned - pictures and saddle with legs. As for poses I think we could get half point - there are interchangeable parts in this set so you're able to assemble this model in variety of ways .
@Manchu: "hairless" body was a deliberate choice. First of all I have to admit I've always hated painting sculpted fur (with VERY few exceptions). Also I think that at this scale regular fur would apear as a smooth surface. That's why I've asked Robert to sculpt fur only in the areas where it is the longest
I like the saddle a lot, as well. I have learned (from the LotR DVD bonus features, no less) that predators have flexing spines rather than "stationary" ones (like horses) so if your were to ride one--like a giant wolf--you'd basically need to sit astride its haunches or just behind (see the Warg riders). I know TWC seem a tad ludricous just conceptually but I think this unrealistic execution unconciously contributes to the impression of absurdity. It's a definite design challenge, I'll grant.
I like everything forward of the hind legs, but that sloping back and too short hind legs put me off. Nice try but no cigar, the Paulson ones http://www.paulsongames.com/resin.html pip it by some way. Sorry if this post is a bit negative, as I normally like the sculpts, and give the German heads a thumbs up even though I have no use for them
I disagree with the posters above: It's got great physiology and the face is really good. The only thing I'd agree is an issue is the lack of multiple poses. The free limbs might help somewhat, but it's body posture that really needs to be adjusted. Rescuplting some casts to have a right-leaning pose and a forward-leaning pose would be plenty.
Infinity: Way, way better than 40K and more affordable to boot!
"If you gather 250 consecutive issues of White Dwarf, and burn them atop a pyre of Citadel spray guns, legend has it Gwar will appear and answer a single rules-related question. " -Ouze
2010/10/01 22:08:04
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (OCT 1 - Mechanised Wolf prev - pg10)
This is the first Maxmini thing I haven't loved. I just find the sculpt quality isn't up to their usual level of quality, both in design and execution. Sorry Maxmini!
no need to be sorry - i'm tough skinned . I knew that it won't apeal to all - even though I disagree about the quality. But I'm in lucky position in this way that I've had this model in my hands.
Well, can't please everyone - hope we'll come up with something that people that don't like the wolf will enjoy .
Przemas wrote:@Scottywan82 : it will sound a tad arrogant but I consider neither of those linked as a competition. IMO none of them is a cool sculpt (maybe with the exception of a MAS one, but it's not mechanical, but a very cool giant wolf).
I'm pretty sure we'll match at least 2 of the points you've mentioned - pictures and saddle with legs. As for poses I think we could get half point - there are interchangeable parts in this set so you're able to assemble this model in variety of ways .
Fair enough. For me, I'm past that irresistible urge stage for Twolves, but it's your business.
I'd just rather see you guys turn your considerable sculpting skills to something else instead. Any number of things spring to mind. Particularly barrage-fire-Imperial-Guard things with tracks.
2010/10/02 00:12:52
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (OCT 1 - Mechanised Wolf prev - pg10)
The musculature looks quite soft, although that may just be the pictures. But that, combined with the static pose makes it a less interesting option than some of the others that are already out there.
2010/10/02 07:49:18
Subject: MaxMini.eu previews and new releases (OCT 1 - Mechanised Wolf prev - pg10)
I very much dislike that cyborg wolf. The non-cyborg is OK. In either event, no legs, I don't think.
That being said, Maxmini makes a great deal of things I like very much. I just got my first order delivered from there and found the casting quality to be top notch.
lord_blackfang wrote: Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote: The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock