Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/22 23:35:23
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
Kanluwen wrote:Tsilber wrote: Vankraken wrote:Its kinda bad when even GW is struggling to justify the split between the Skitarii and Cult Mech codex when they can't even keep the starter bundle contained to models from one codex.
Actually it is great marketing, and excellent deal towards a great formation that requires 3 books to play, which goes full circle to marketing.
And that formation requires a White Dwarf long since unavailable, so until it makes an appearance in an actual book?
It's not marketing. It's them finding the one and only Mechanicus blister to add in.
Yeah, its too bad no one can get their hands on that formation except that white dwarf. If only we had some sort of global search engine with the option to view images, then copy and print those images... darn it..
And you really don't need the books to play it. (See "if only comment above"). But then there are people who like the fluff and the read and go ahead and buy the books. Oh the books also have the unit specifics and stats inside too I hear.
Your final sentence is comical though.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/12/22 23:39:22
2014 Templecon/Onslaught 40k T, Best overall
2015 Templecon/Onslaught 40kGT, Best overall
2015, Nova open 40kGT Semifinalist.
2015 40k Golden Sprue Champ.
2016 Best General Portal Annual Spring 40kGT
2017 Best General, 3rd Annual Winter 40kGT Hosted by The Portal.
2018 Triumph 40k GT. Best Overall.
2018 Best General, 4th Annual Winter 40kGT Hosted by The Portal.
, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 00:19:54
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Tsilber wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Tsilber wrote: Vankraken wrote:Its kinda bad when even GW is struggling to justify the split between the Skitarii and Cult Mech codex when they can't even keep the starter bundle contained to models from one codex.
Actually it is great marketing, and excellent deal towards a great formation that requires 3 books to play, which goes full circle to marketing.
And that formation requires a White Dwarf long since unavailable, so until it makes an appearance in an actual book?
It's not marketing. It's them finding the one and only Mechanicus blister to add in.
Yeah, its too bad no one can get their hands on that formation except that white dwarf. If only we had some sort of global search engine with the option to view images, then copy and print those images... darn it..
That's fine and dandy for places that will allow that.
Personally? I won't let you ever play a scan of a Formation like that. If you wanted the Formation, you could have bought White Dwarf like everyone else did.
And you really don't need the books to play it. (See "if only comment above"). But then there are people who like the fluff and the read and go ahead and buy the books. Oh the books also have the unit specifics and stats inside too I hear.
Again, that's fine and dandy for places that will allow that. No shop I know of will though and I can't foresee too many players being that lenient beyond the first couple of games.
Your final sentence is comical though.
And your insistence that this is somehow tied to them "being unable to maintain a split between Cult Mechanicus and Skitarii" is childlike petulance at best. You're not complaining about the Officio Prefectus Commissar being in the Guard bundle, yet he's somehow required for every single damn Militarum Tempestus Formation and mysteriously absent in the vast majority of Guard formations.
OMG! GW can't even maintain a split between the Tempestus and Guard, what a joke!
In both the Guard and Skitarii bundles, the only Warlord options(note: Warlord NOT HQ options) that are available outside of squads are two blisters that are commonly used for their allied contingents.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/23 00:21:10
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 00:45:40
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
hahaha. Plenty of places including Gts allow a copy of a formation or a copy of a unit allowed, if it came from a limited production or out of print book. Specially forgeworld entries.
I do understand and agree a codex hard copy should be on hand for events. But local stores, friday night gaming, or playing with friends does not have such requirements.
|
2014 Templecon/Onslaught 40k T, Best overall
2015 Templecon/Onslaught 40kGT, Best overall
2015, Nova open 40kGT Semifinalist.
2015 40k Golden Sprue Champ.
2016 Best General Portal Annual Spring 40kGT
2017 Best General, 3rd Annual Winter 40kGT Hosted by The Portal.
2018 Triumph 40k GT. Best Overall.
2018 Best General, 4th Annual Winter 40kGT Hosted by The Portal.
, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 01:21:26
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Lol. Any store that doesn't let you run a formation because it was limited and you didn't physically buy the stupid thing required is a store that will lose people pretty quickly. With things like the War Convocation, new Bloodthirsters for Daemons, Skyhammer (especially if you already owned the Devs and Assaults and didn't need the models), etc, you would have to be insane to expect an average gamer to own random things with how hard they make it to do so.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 01:24:17
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Not my problem if you didn't buy the White Dwarf then. I got my copy, why didn't you get yours?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 01:25:39
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I wonder if the lack of a chaos box is a sign that their range will be getting new models?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 01:40:19
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Kanluwen wrote:Not my problem if you didn't buy the White Dwarf then. I got my copy, why didn't you get yours?
Because I didn't play AdMech when it came out and I don't collect WDs for the heck of it. Now, I want to start AdMech and run the Convocation, but it's not sold. Well just screw me then for not knowing what I would be doing months in the future, right?
Literally the only people I know who would force the sort of environment you're talking about are GW employees, which is why we all go to a FLGS instead now.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 02:56:33
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I think the only reason the Dominus is in the Skitarii set is because every other box has a leader model of some sort, but Skitarii do not have one available. So they go with the next closest thing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 03:01:07
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Nvs wrote:I wonder if the lack of a chaos box is a sign that their range will be getting new models?
We've had it from reliable sources that there's nothing Chaos Marine related at all next year, except perhaps a new plastic 1kSons kit.
Earliest timeframe for a codex/model overhaul is 2017, though personally I'm willing to bet that GW is just as content to let the Chaos Marine range die out at this point as it's been so badly neglected for so long now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 05:31:10
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Kanluwen wrote:Not my problem if you didn't buy the White Dwarf then. I got my copy, why didn't you get yours?
"I didn't get stabbed, why did you?"
Try harder next time. Not all of us have money to spare on silly marketing for a company that sharts on its own long term customers on a daily basis. If your rather spend your money and time on a magazine so GW can show you how big the next round of price increases are instead of saving or investing that money in something else, be my guest. Some of us have things we consider "better things" to do with our money.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 05:45:03
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
McNinja wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Not my problem if you didn't buy the White Dwarf then. I got my copy, why didn't you get yours?
"I didn't get stabbed, why did you?"
Try harder next time. Not all of us have money to spare on silly marketing for a company that sharts on its own long term customers on a daily basis. If your rather spend your money and time on a magazine so GW can show you how big the next round of price increases are instead of saving or investing that money in something else, be my guest. Some of us have things we consider "better things" to do with our money.
Right, because not buying a non-limited item then complaining about not having it is totally the same thing as getting stabbed. Internal forces vs. external forces at work.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 05:47:59
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Pustulating Plague Priest
|
McNinja wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Not my problem if you didn't buy the White Dwarf then. I got my copy, why didn't you get yours?
"I didn't get stabbed, why did you?".
Oh come on, how fair is that coming from a ninja?
|
There’s a difference between having a hobby and being a narcissist. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 06:46:00
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
We'll find out soon enough eh.
|
Tsilber wrote: Vankraken wrote:Its kinda bad when even GW is struggling to justify the split between the Skitarii and Cult Mech codex when they can't even keep the starter bundle contained to models from one codex.
Actually it is great marketing, and excellent deal towards a great formation that requires 3 books to play, which goes full circle to marketing.
Well, not really. The amount of people showing up at my local clubs over the last few years using home-printed ringbound codices has skyrocketed, and of four I think I'm the only AdMech player who actually has both hardbound books. And even for me, buying both was a rarity; I went from "guy who buys all the codices for the fluff" to "guy who buys only the codices he absolutely needs and looks at Lexicanum for the fluff" because of crap like the AdMech codex split. Making your product such a terrible value proposition that lots of people simply pirate it instead of buying it is hardly "great marketing".
But this set of deals, assuming they're not yet-another Super Special Ultra Mega Limited BUY BUY BUY Edition product and will actually be sticking around, might be an indication they're beginning to understand that. The pricing on these is actually low enough to challenge China Forge, certainly once you factor in online discounts. Imagine that; trying to win back customers by offering them value for money, it'll never catch on.
EDIT: And guys, don't bother arguing with Kan, he's stated publicly before that he deliberately posts crap like that to get a rise out of people. For some reason the mods have decided that his admission many of his posts are the literal definition of trolling doesn't count, so just don't engage.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/23 06:49:59
I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.
"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 07:27:26
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Kanluwen wrote:Personally? I won't let you ever play a scan of a Formation like that. If you wanted the Formation, you could have bought White Dwarf like everyone else did.
You don't like when we say this about you Kan. So I won't. But in all seriousness, stop being suck a stick-in-the-mud.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/23 07:28:15
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 11:17:14
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine
UK
|
It does make me laugh that the same people complaining about the price being a barrier to entry put up the same kind of barriers re print outs and copies.
If you're unwilling to play someone who brings a print out of a formation that was only available for a limited time, then you seriously need to rethink your priorities in life.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 11:40:59
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
You guys DO realise, the WD issue in question is available in digital per the GW webstore?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 11:50:08
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
General Kroll wrote:It does make me laugh that the same people complaining about the price being a barrier to entry put up the same kind of barriers re print outs and copies.
If you're unwilling to play someone who brings a print out of a formation that was only available for a limited time, then you seriously need to rethink your priorities in life.
If you can build an army to the tune of several hundred dollars but refuse to put up the FOUR DOLLARS for a frickin' White Dwarf, you need to rethink yours as well. Seriously, the entitlement of a lot of people these days is just annoying. GW isn't a charity. Yes, they do ask ridiculous prices for a lot of their stuff, but White Dwarf is hardly one of those things.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:06:43
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Kanluwen wrote:Not my problem if you didn't buy the White Dwarf then. I got my copy, why didn't you get yours?
Oh, I don't know. Because you were born with an extra chromosome?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:22:08
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Kanluwen wrote:
Personally? I won't let you ever play a scan of a Formation like that. If you wanted the Formation, you could have bought White Dwarf like everyone else did.
Lmao, that's pathetic. You sound like a terrible opponent, probably saving people the trouble of needing to deal with you if you decline a game over stupid gak like that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:28:16
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
But how can you live by 'pay to win' if the other guy plays 'photocopy to win'? O_o
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:34:14
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'm just going to throw out the suggestion that the tone and candor of this thread may want to be relaxed a bit, as much of the current discussion is irrelevant to the topic and is ignoring the golden dakka rule.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:35:27
Subject: Re:2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Deadly Dark Eldar Warrior
|
To go back on topic-ish, since I doubt we'll get anything solid rumor wise until the new year, there's a dearth of of 40k related rumors for the new year. I can't imagine GW neglecting their flagship game that long, but back in the days of being a Fantasy player I loved that chunk of time in 2014 when we had fantasy release after fantasy release, Im guessing the AoS players are the same.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/23 12:35:50
Like a true Tomb King, change (to AoS) has left me bitter and vengeful.
Admech: I'll make Graia work some day
Drukhari: 3rd Edition Archon. WhatWouldSkariDo?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:35:37
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine
UK
|
casvalremdeikun wrote: General Kroll wrote:It does make me laugh that the same people complaining about the price being a barrier to entry put up the same kind of barriers re print outs and copies.
If you're unwilling to play someone who brings a print out of a formation that was only available for a limited time, then you seriously need to rethink your priorities in life.
If you can build an army to the tune of several hundred dollars but refuse to put up the FOUR DOLLARS for a frickin' White Dwarf, you need to rethink yours as well. Seriously, the entitlement of a lot of people these days is just annoying. GW isn't a charity. Yes, they do ask ridiculous prices for a lot of their stuff, but White Dwarf is hardly one of those things.
It's nothing to do with the price. Someone may have missed the WD that it was in. I don't even buy WD these days, it's a piss poor magazine. But it's pretty pathetic to refuse to play someone because all they have is a copy. It's a game for Christ sake, its supposed to be fun. Why put barriers up to stop someone else playing. As long as the rules are correct, there shouldn't be a problem.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/12/23 12:35:52
Subject: 2016 GW possible releases & rumours
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
So...
No actual news.
No rumors.
And a lot of Rule #1 violations?
Looks like we're done here.
|
|
 |
 |
|