SkullHamma vs Stompa

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Waaagh Junkie**

So what do you think people? A Skullhamma tank or a Stompa for an Ork 40K army. Its a more mix right now so not a theme yet. Im more wondering if anyone has any advice on either or both units or a preferance. Thanks all

Edit: Skullhamma not Skullthumpa sorry team

**Lord Rogukiel**

Skullhamma.

Stompas are overrated in most cases.

**Waaagh Junkie**

Any particular reason? The Stompa seems to have a bigger arsenal and a better chance of surviving. Pointwise its about ??200?? Cant remember exactly so not super huge difference.

**Dashofpepper**

I think the Big Mek stompa is where its at. Cyber-stompa? If I recall correctly, that's 650 points? Fielding several of these makes for a tasty time.

**Waaagh Junkie**

Thanks Dash, Looking at the stats and such I would agree has anyone ever played an apoc game with one of these?

**Lord Rogukiel**

Against a stompa yes, but maybe not the mek version. I wasn't really impressed by it, and it's bark was worst than its bite to be honest. Then again, I might just have gotten lucky.