Switch Theme:

UK Grand Tournament House Rules updated with Codex Orks answers...  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Denison, Iowa

Some of those rulings actually go against what is in current FAQS and RAW.
   
Made in us
Phanobi





Paso Robles, CA, USA

Good thing I don't play in any UK GT's. Those rulings are just stupid in many cases.

Ozymandias, King of Kings

My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings.
Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.

Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.

This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.

A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut



south florida

Blackmoor wrote:Everyone is acting as if the studio put out these FAQs and that they are official GW rulings.

I have news for you guys, they are as official as the Adepticon FAQs. They are not done by the GW studio, but rather by the guys who run the UKGT.


They put one of these faq out every year and they always have off the wall crap in it. Just because he works for GW UK and is running thier tournament dosn't mean he knows the rules.

New Official WC forums http://www.40kwreckingcrew.aceboard.com

 
   
Made in se
Dakka Veteran




Just wanted to point out that some of the people at warseer claims the games dev are involved in this FAQ.
   
Made in us
Been Around the Block





Kallbrand wrote:Just wanted to point out that some of the people at warseer claims the games dev are involved in this FAQ.


Im sorry but I don't think I can see how that matters at all...
What would matter more if a representive actually came out and said "This is a FAQ, for Warhammer 40k you must use it."
Coo for the developers I guess for them getting to work on it; but tell said time of representive I'd doubt it.
And if it came truee... I'd hide in a hole...

Never ever ever watch B movies for fun.
It will ruin your mind.
TRUST ME. 
   
Made in us
Awesome Autarch






Las Vegas, NV

The UKGT faq always sucks, and who cares who wrote it if its not offical.

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Long Beach, CA

On the bright side now I will not have to update all my orks to carry shootas. I just dont want to do it without the power fist.

"Do NOT ask me if you can fire the squad you forgot to shoot once we are in the assault phase, EVER!!!"

 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut



Odessa, TX

smart_alex wrote:On the bright side now I will not have to update all my orks to carry shootas. I just dont want to do it without the power fist.


It's a shame, one of the things I liked most about the new book was there was actually an incentive to give your boyz something besides sluggas. Now with the inability to take power claws we're back to the same old orks with nothing but sluggas like before.

And I understand that this isn't an "official" GW FAQ but being that it is the FAQ for the UK GTs it will still certainly seem official to a lot of people and I definitely do not envy the ork players the task of constantly trying to defend why their army list isn't illegal. A lot of people just aren't going to appreciate the subtlety of GT FAQ vs. Adepticon FAQ and this is going to do nothing but lead to needless arguments and problems.
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

tomguycot wrote:
smart_alex wrote:On the bright side now I will not have to update all my orks to carry shootas. I just dont want to do it without the power fist.


It's a shame, one of the things I liked most about the new book was there was actually an incentive to give your boyz something besides sluggas. Now with the inability to take power claws we're back to the same old orks with nothing but sluggas like before.

And I understand that this isn't an "official" GW FAQ but being that it is the FAQ for the UK GTs it will still certainly seem official to a lot of people and I definitely do not envy the ork players the task of constantly trying to defend why their army list isn't illegal. A lot of people just aren't going to appreciate the subtlety of GT FAQ vs. Adepticon FAQ and this is going to do nothing but lead to needless arguments and problems.



Well, ultimately it will depend upon what tournament you are playing in, but frankly the ruling in the UKGT house rules is utter crap.

By the supposed RAW the reason you cannot take a powerklaw in a Shoota Mob is because you have to upgrade the Nob's Slugga and Choppa to a Shoota along with the rest of the unit.

The entire codex is filled with examples of Shoota mobs led by Nobs with Slugga and Choppas! In the inaugural battle report, Phil Kelly (the codex author) used a Powerklaw Nob in his Shoota mob.

The only thing that will cause confusion are people who somehow mistake the UKGT house rules for some sort of official FAQ which they shouldn't since the darn things are called HOUSE RULES.

They may be put out by the UKGW Event organizer but at the end of the day they aren't any more official than the myriad of other tournament FAQs produced by fans.


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Long Beach, CA

well, one thing that I was gonna do as my friend recomended is just keep all the sluggas and choppas in the ork hands then just glue a shoota to all thier backs, that way all your bases are covered and you can change your list before each event at will.

"Do NOT ask me if you can fire the squad you forgot to shoot once we are in the assault phase, EVER!!!"

 
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

... as long as the events you're entering aren't particularly strict on WYSIWYG.

 
   
Made in us
Rogue Daemonhunter fueled by Chaos






Toledo, OH

insaniak wrote:... as long as the events you're entering aren't particularly strict on WYSIWYG.


According to RAW, you have to model every upgrade, but you don't have to buy every upgrade modeled.
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

I wasn't talking about RAW. I was talking about WYSIWYG.

WYSIWYG isn't actually included in the current ruleset. The closest it gets is specifying in most codexes that upgrades need to be shown, but makes no reference to regular equipment.

As a gaming convention, WYSIWYG works both ways. Or rather, it only works one way, which is the way that is explained by its own name.

Including equipment on a model that it doesn't actually have is just as much against WYSIWYG as the reverse. Either way, what you are seeing is not what you are getting.

 
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: