What does dakka think of this scheme????

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Hugs-for-the-Hug-God**

Thanks for the idea but i'm gonna use Dryads as Wraithguard!
And treemen as Wraithlords

**lindsay40k**

I'd have seen Treekin as being Wraithguard, myself. Dryads would need some bulking up to look like T5 3+.

**Hugs-for-the-Hug-God**

Ok guys i did the scheme on dawn of wars army painter: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007080668/screenshot/540653520102830150/?tab=public

Is that good?

**Capitansolstice**

Looks Great

**mullet_steve**

Not bad man...

**Hugs-for-the-Hug-God**

... being what???

**mullet_steve**

not bad scheme on the dawn of war screen shots IS what I meant. It's not quite what I imagined but it looks great.

**AustonT**

Erm. The more orange original would have been more striking, this one is...meh. It's like Meg from family guy: it sounds like a hot chick but turns out to be a beanie wearing slob.

**ceku**

The red gems blend into the orange too much. Maybe use something that stands out?

**Hugs-for-the-Hug-God**

Yeah i think ill stay with the origial. Because its more straight forward.

**shingouki**

Coolyo294 wrote:Looks nice, but not very forest-y.

^
Hit the nail on the head.