Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So, if your 14 year old illiterate and uneducated, abused wife dies while you were beating her for looking out the window without permission, you get to have sex with her body for 6 hours afterwards, and since women have no rights, get away with murder?

I think we've found where Gary Glitter is going when he gets out of prison...

You think his tastes have matured then?

A convicted paedo with a no fly restriction who has been banned from quite a large number of countries will take what he can get

sarpedons-right-hand wrote:Ha! I have a hate hate relationship with the Daily Hate Mail, but that story is awesome....

Although I haven't even flicked past the front page of that hateful rag for around a year. Lately they have been slamming Internet pornography, claiming that it's skewing the minds of our young and impressionable children....

Then they run a story on Egypt, who are possibly going to ok a law legalising necrophilia.... Brilliant...

I read that story, what a load of old gak that was. Basically, another "BRITISH MORALS DISSOLVING THANKS TO LIBERAL PARENTS AND SECULARISM!" rant. I know, it didn't mention secularism, but that's the exception, not the rule. Emperor almighty. I struggle to see how only 50 cases of sex offences by minors in south London is particularly surprising (as in, surprisingly often). Also, it chimed in about how parents need to take control of their children and that made me angry.

If you're in SE Asia make sure it's actually a woman first and don't solicit prostitutes when exceptionally drunk.

I've never met a ladyboy, I've never even been to Asia, but I'm not repelled by them. Heck, I've seen pictures of some who are actually considerably more attractive than "real" women who are considered sexy. But then I'm very supportive of transgender people.

Edit: Accidentally missed out the word not from a sentence.

It seems this story is somewhat less than true.

http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.ca/2012/04/necrophilia-law-is-rumor-ya-people.html

George Spiggott wrote:It seems this story is somewhat less than true.

http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.ca/2012/04/necrophilia-law-is-rumor-ya-people.html

Good lord, the Daily Mail published something as inflammatory fact without fact-checking it at all!? Shocking!!

Yeah, can't say as I'm super surprised. Still, not outright denied yet, just unconfirmed rumour.

htj wrote:

George Spiggott wrote:It seems this story is somewhat less than true.

http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.ca/2012/04/necrophilia-law-is-rumor-ya-people.html

Good lord, the Daily Mail published something as inflammatory fact without fact-checking it at all!? Shocking!!

Yeah, can't say as I'm super surprised. Still, not outright denied yet, just unconfirmed rumour.

Yes George. Its the Daily Mail, hardly a bastion of journalistic integrity is it?

Its right up there with the Guardian for spreading ridiculous nonsense to make cheap political points.

Now after little research it turned out that this is rumor was started by Egypt’s Glenn Beck aka Tawfik Okasha who hates the Islamists just as he hates the revolution.

Oooh, that's harsh.

mattyrm wrote:

htj wrote:

George Spiggott wrote:It seems this story is somewhat less than true.

http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.ca/2012/04/necrophilia-law-is-rumor-ya-people.html

Good lord, the Daily Mail published something as inflammatory fact without fact-checking it at all!? Shocking!!

Yeah, can't say as I'm super surprised. Still, not outright denied yet, just unconfirmed rumour.

Yes George. Its the Daily Mail, hardly a bastion of journalistic integrity is it?

Its right up there with the Guardian for spreading ridiculous nonsense to make cheap political points.

Bless 'em. Trying to stay relavent is tough for the print media, who can blame them for not bothering with the difficult integrity bit.

mattyrm wrote:

htj wrote:

George Spiggott wrote:It seems this story is somewhat less than true.

http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.ca/2012/04/necrophilia-law-is-rumor-ya-people.html

Good lord, the Daily Mail published something as inflammatory fact without fact-checking it at all!? Shocking!!

Yeah, can't say as I'm super surprised. Still, not outright denied yet, just unconfirmed rumour.

Yes George. Its the Daily Mail, hardly a bastion of journalistic integrity is it?

Its right up there with the Guardian for spreading ridiculous nonsense to make cheap political points.

One can only hope that someday the Daily Mail will reach the level of journalistic integrity of random blogspot posters.

AustonT wrote:
One can only hope that someday the Daily Mail will reach the level of journalistic integrity of random blogspot posters.

Too true old boy!

AustonT wrote:One can only hope that someday the Daily Mail will reach the level of journalistic integrity of random blogspot posters.

Sadly... yes.

I read on the bbc news website that some people still buy newspapers. How strange.

Joey wrote:I read on the bbc news website that some people still buy newspapers. How strange.

Puppies still need to be housebroken. Primary schools still need to make papier mache things. Alternatively, it could be hipsters - reading newspapers ironically.

Joey wrote:I read on the bbc news website that some people still buy newspapers. How strange.

Where I worked until the start of this year, newspapers sold out most days, especially the Mail.

Newspapers are in conspiricy with many work places by blocking online news outlets/anything online. People still need something to do during the day, so they are forced to buy papers.

htj wrote: Alternatively, it could be hipsters - reading newspapers ironically.

Hipsters doing things ironically makes me want to break their faces; ironically (but not really). No really I want to rearrange thier features. Luckily thier heads are already up thier collective asses.

mattyrm wrote:Its right up there with the Guardian for spreading ridiculous nonsense to make cheap political points.

Rubbish, the Daily Mail is in a league of it's own. It's closest left wing publication is probably the Daily Mirror or the Beano if it has any at all. The Guardian sits opposite the Torygraph.

George Spiggott wrote:

mattyrm wrote:Its right up there with the Guardian for spreading ridiculous nonsense to make cheap political points.

Rubbish, the Daily Mail is in a league of it's own. It's closest left wing publication is probably the Daily Mirror or the Beano if it has any at all. The Guardian sits opposite the Torygraph.

Granted the Mirror is way worse than the Guardian, but I reckon the Telegraph is a better paper than the Guardian, the Guardian had to print an apology to the bloody Sun last year!

mattyrm wrote:...but I reckon the Telegraph is a better paper than the Guardian, the Guardian had to print an apology to the bloody Sun last year!

A schoolboy error on the part of the Guardian. The Sun doesn't doorstep people, they just tap their phones.