Switch Theme:

What do they really mean by "most extreme" president of all time?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Anointed Dark Priest of Chaos






Frazzled wrote:
Melissia wrote:Yes, there's always outliers who get reported on more than they should. If you want to try to argue that they're representative of all Democrats, then you should also be arguing that Curtis Knapp and Fred Phelps are representative of all Christians.


You mean like Al Gore, former VP of the United States? he's no "outlier."


The same Al Gore who thinks he invented the Internet? He IS, WAS, and will continue to be nuttier than a fruit cake.

Melissa's point is still valid.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/05 16:14:49


++ Death In The Dark++ A Zone Mortalis Hobby Project Log: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/663090.page#8712701
 
   
Made in us
Ancient Chaos Terminator





Satellite of Love

The current strategy to sabotage everything that might help the American people by the GOP has been done before. It's a decades old strategy that's been done before. Great film footage of Harry Truman calling them out on it and more including Nixon's treason and how Reagan helped the Iranians just to win the election.




When all else fails - do everything you can to sabotage a Democratic president - and make sure the American people hate him at the end of the day - no matter what. In tonight's Daily Take - I'll tell you why that is the real official platform of the Republican Party. Ever since Franklin Delano Roosevelt famously won the office of the presidency four times in a row, the Republican strategy against Democrats has been pretty simple and can be summed up in one word: "Sabatoge." When there's a Democrat in the White House, simply and purely do everything possible to sabatoge his efforts to do anything that will make him look good or will help the American people If President Obama doesn't start channeling his inner Harry Truman, we should all get ready for President Romney - and the super-hard-right-wing Supreme Court he'll bring us.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2012/06/05 16:41:53


"I hate movies where the men wear shorter skirts than the women." -- Mystery Science Theater 3000
"Elements of the past and the future combining to create something not quite as good as either." -- The Mighty Boosh
Check out Cinematic Titanic, the new movie riffing project from Joel Hodgson and the original cast of MST3K.
See my latest eBay auctions at this link.
"We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. You have our gratitude!" - Kentucky Fried Movie 
   
Made in us
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)




The Great State of Texas

CT GAMER wrote:
Frazzled wrote:
Melissia wrote:Yes, there's always outliers who get reported on more than they should. If you want to try to argue that they're representative of all Democrats, then you should also be arguing that Curtis Knapp and Fred Phelps are representative of all Christians.


You mean like Al Gore, former VP of the United States? he's no "outlier."


The same Al Gore who thinks he invented the Internet? He IS, WAS, and will continue to be nuttier than a fruit cake.

Melissa's point is still valid.


Yet the Democrats ran him as the Vice President of the United States...mmm you can't say he's an outlier when he was second in command of the Freaking Democratic Party.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
BrassScorpion wrote:The current strategy to sabotage everything that might help the American people by the GOP has been done before. It's a decades old strategy that's been done before. Great film footage of Harry Truman calling them out on it and more including Nixon's treason and how Reagan helped the Iranians just to win the election.




When all else fails - do everything you can to sabotage a Democratic president - and make sure the American people hate him at the end of the day - no matter what. In tonight's Daily Take - I'll tell you why that is the real official platform of the Republican Party. Ever since Franklin Delano Roosevelt famously won the office of the presidency four times in a row, the Republican strategy against Democrats has been pretty simple and can be summed up in one word: "Sabatoge." When there's a Democrat in the White House, simply and purely do everything possible to sabatoge his efforts to do anything that will make him look good or will help the American people If President Obama doesn't start channeling his inner Harry Truman, we should all get ready for President Romney - and the super-hard-right-wing Supreme Court he'll bring us.


Nixon's treason? I was wrong. You're not Bill Maher, you're Bill Ayers...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/05 17:03:14


-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Leerstetten, Germany

Maybe they ran him to make all the other Democratic candidates seem more normal?
   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

Al Gore has become more and more extremist as time goes on. Much like the Republican party as a whole I suppose.

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Melissia wrote:Al Gore has become more and more extremist as time goes on. Much like the Republican party as a whole I suppose.

That's quite the jump. Former Democratic presidential candidate (that won popular vote) grows more and more extremist. Other party affected.
I wonder what Gore's actual popularity is among Dems today.

 Avatar 720 wrote:
You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.

Come check out my Blood Angels,Crimson Fists, and coming soon Eldar
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391013.page
I have conceded that the Eldar page I started in P&M is their legitimate home. Free Candy! Updated 10/19.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391553.page
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters..
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






I dare you to find a more extreme(ly awesome) president than one President Col. Theodore Roosevelt.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Spitsbergen

I dare BrassScorpion to reveal to us his true identity as Bill Maher.
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





Bill Maher wouldn't have used such a poor quality recording in the OP. It's like someone recorded their TV with a camcorder.

Was anyone able to get through that clip?

text removed by Moderation team. 
   
Made in us
Hangin' with Gork & Mork






biccat wrote:Was anyone able to get through that clip?


Nope. Even if the quality were better I can't see it happening.

Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
 
   
Made in us
Anointed Dark Priest of Chaos






Frazzled wrote:
Yet the Democrats ran him as the Vice President of the United States...mmm you can't say he's an outlier when he was second in command of the Freaking Democratic Party.


I thought Hillary was Second in command?

Sort of how Cheney was actually calling all the shots from behind the curtain...

++ Death In The Dark++ A Zone Mortalis Hobby Project Log: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/663090.page#8712701
 
   
Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

AustonT wrote:
Kid_Kyoto wrote:Obama seems to me a center-right moderate in the Clinton model.

I think a lot his foes are painting him as 'extreme' because of the rumors he's part black.

I suppose you used the same metric that convinced you the Washington Post was center right?


Pretty much. His signature accompishment after all is a health-care bill based on long-standing Republican proposals which goes out of its way to enrich private insurers without offering a public option at all, much less the sort of single payer plan that works so well in Canada, Europe and Japan.

His Wall Street regulation was timid and not even close to what the left was pushing.

He said he supports gay marriage but wants it left up to the states. Y'know, just how people opposed segregation back in the day but wanted it left up to the states Sigh. THe rights of a minority should not be left to a vote of majority.

I really have no idea what conservatives think liberalism is, but it ain't this.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
streamdragon wrote:I dare you to find a more extreme(ly awesome) president than one President Col. Theodore Roosevelt.


Franklin Roosevelt set up social security and other New Deal elements. Oh and won World War II.

Truman ended decades of isolation and set up the Cold War order.

Eisenhower ended segregation in the south.

Now those are big foreign and domestic changes.

These days... Well Bush and now Obama have brought us 10+ years of war and domestic survelence but even that is not as extreme as the leaders of the 30s to the 50s.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/05 22:29:00


 
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





Kid_Kyoto wrote:Franklin Roosevelt set up social security and other New Deal elements. Oh and won World War II.

That's quite spectacular, considering he died before the end of the war.

text removed by Moderation team. 
   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

biccat wrote:
Kid_Kyoto wrote:Franklin Roosevelt set up social security and other New Deal elements. Oh and won World War II.

That's quite spectacular, considering he died before the end of the war.


These things aren't 100% mutually exclusive, are they? He died, what, 2 weeks before the war ended? It was a done deal.

To use an analogy, most people typically credit Reagan with helping to topple the Berlin wall, but he hadn't been president for quite some time when it actually happened.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in us
Secret Force Behind the Rise of the Tau




USA

He died 2 weeks before the end of the war in Europe. Japan went on for several more months, but its a toss up if things would have turned out any different.

   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






LordofHats wrote:He died 2 weeks before the end of the war in Europe. Japan went on for several more months, but its a toss up if things would have turned out any different.

Is it THAT much of a toss up? The only change in outcome would have been the number of dead and possibly the date.
Ultimately he did not win the war; the men who did the fighting and the dying won the war. He lead the country to victory ; there is a difference.

 Avatar 720 wrote:
You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.

Come check out my Blood Angels,Crimson Fists, and coming soon Eldar
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391013.page
I have conceded that the Eldar page I started in P&M is their legitimate home. Free Candy! Updated 10/19.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391553.page
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters..
 
   
Made in us
Dwarf High King with New Book of Grudges




United States

LordofHats wrote:That is ration sensation. I can name several presidents more extreme than Obama. FDR, Lincoln, Jefferson and Adams were on opposite ends and their administrations were giant rubber bands of policy. Hell, Jackson told the SCOTUS to shove it.


Basically this.

Our society loves hyperbole. Not that others didn't, of course they did, but we live in the age of "Halo R0xx0rz, COD Suxx0rz!" Everything is either awesome or terrible in the minds of many.

AustonT wrote:
Ultimately he did not win the war; the men who did the fighting and the dying won the war. He lead the country to victory ; there is a difference.


Its better to say that he was crucial to winning the war. Without Roosevelt in office early on many things would have been different.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/06/06 06:05:01


Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh. 
   
Made in us
Secret Force Behind the Rise of the Tau




USA

AustonT wrote:
LordofHats wrote:He died 2 weeks before the end of the war in Europe. Japan went on for several more months, but its a toss up if things would have turned out any different.

Is it THAT much of a toss up? The only change in outcome would have been the number of dead and possibly the date.
Ultimately he did not win the war; the men who did the fighting and the dying won the war. He lead the country to victory ; there is a difference.


Some have argued that FDR would have never dropped the bomb (which is what I mean).

   
Made in us
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan






Pleasant Valley, Iowa

LordofHats wrote:Some have argued that FDR would have never dropped the bomb (which is what I mean).


I hadn't considered that; and that makes the "FDR won the war" argument problematic. I think it's difficult to say any war has been resolved when later on in the conflictm the use of 2 nuclear weapons were required to finally end it for really realz.

 lord_blackfang wrote:
Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.

 Flinty wrote:
The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock
 
   
Made in us
Dwarf High King with New Book of Grudges




United States

FDR definitely made the war, as it happened, possible; which is something.

Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh. 
   
Made in au
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





Ouze wrote:You missed "mitigating the successful elimination of OBL". I found that the right-wing type people are very quick to make sure that Obama gets minimal-to-no credit for Obama's call to send in the SEALS despite the fact it was a very dangerous call to make politically, and he was roundly ridiculed for suggesting that he would go into Pakistan at all previously.


Yeah, that's a good point.

So far as being "extreme", I've found him to be extremely moderate and middle of the road in all ways.


Definitely. Obama is a middle of the road, consensus kind of guy. That's not just politically, that's his personality type - he looks for ways to compromise with people to produce a result for everyone. That's why he brought forward a Republican plan to begin healthcare reform.

Of course, the Republicans have decided to just ignore all that and pretend Obama is extreme. Hence the stupidity about Obama being the most extreme, it relies on the old trick exaggerating so far that most people will assume part of it is true, and that Obama must be a little bit extreme.

Having a mass of Republican footsoldiers out there willing to believe any nonsense provided it makes the other side look bad doesn't hurt, either.

And I dearly loved your analogy


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Melissia wrote:Al Gore has become more and more extremist as time goes on. Much like the Republican party as a whole I suppose.


Al Gore became more extreme once he left politics. Happens to almost everyone - once you remove the responsibility for having to make real world decisions people slip into easier ideological positions.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/06 06:44:55


“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”

Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. 
   
Made in us
Secret Force Behind the Rise of the Tau




USA

Ouze wrote:
LordofHats wrote:Some have argued that FDR would have never dropped the bomb (which is what I mean).


I hadn't considered that; and that makes the "FDR won the war" argument problematic. I think it's difficult to say any war has been resolved when later on in the conflictm the use of 2 nuclear weapons were required to finally end it for really realz.


We would have won the war anyway. At that stage, it was inevitable baring an act of god(s). But I do think there is a possibility that things would have gone differently had FDR not died. Maybe I misrepresented my meaning earlier.

   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





Ouze wrote:
LordofHats wrote:Some have argued that FDR would have never dropped the bomb (which is what I mean).

I hadn't considered that; and that makes the "FDR won the war" argument problematic. I think it's difficult to say any war has been resolved when later on in the conflictm the use of 2 nuclear weapons were required to finally end it for really realz.

If the US hadn't used nuclear weapons on Japan, it's very likely Japan wouldn't have capitulated to a total surrender.

The economic damage to Japan would have likely been worse had we fought to take the home islands.

text removed by Moderation team. 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






LordofHats wrote:
AustonT wrote:
LordofHats wrote:He died 2 weeks before the end of the war in Europe. Japan went on for several more months, but its a toss up if things would have turned out any different.

Is it THAT much of a toss up? The only change in outcome would have been the number of dead and possibly the date.
Ultimately he did not win the war; the men who did the fighting and the dying won the war. He lead the country to victory ; there is a difference.


Some have argued that FDR would have never dropped the bomb (which is what I mean).

FDR was ultimately a ruthless man. I'm not saying that as a bad thing, but it doesn't make it any less true. I think Truman agonized over the decision a lot more than FDR would have. FDR might have dropped the bomb on Tokyo.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/06 13:56:53


 Avatar 720 wrote:
You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.

Come check out my Blood Angels,Crimson Fists, and coming soon Eldar
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391013.page
I have conceded that the Eldar page I started in P&M is their legitimate home. Free Candy! Updated 10/19.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391553.page
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters..
 
   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

FDR certainly was extremely driven and arguably hard-headed...

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





AustonT wrote:FDR might have dropped the bomb on Tokyo.

Unlikely. Tokyo wasn't a good target.

Keep in mind that at the time, we (or at least the political class) didn't really know, or care about, the long-term effects of radiation. They just knew they had an extremely powerful weapon that could level much of a city from a single blast. The value wasn't necessarily in the destruction the bomb caused, but in the psychological value that a single blast could cause. If we can level much of a city with a single bomb, wiping out whole sections of Japan would be next to nothing. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were relatively intact and would better show off the potential of the bombs. Tokyo wouldn't be a good target because we'd already destroyed a good part of the city.

text removed by Moderation team. 
   
Made in gb
Renegade Inquisitor de Marche






Elephant Graveyard

biccat wrote:
AustonT wrote:FDR might have dropped the bomb on Tokyo.

Unlikely. Tokyo wasn't a good target.

Keep in mind that at the time, we (or at least the political class) didn't really know, or care about, the long-term effects of radiation. They just knew they had an extremely powerful weapon that could level much of a city from a single blast. The value wasn't necessarily in the destruction the bomb caused, but in the psychological value that a single blast could cause. If we can level much of a city with a single bomb, wiping out whole sections of Japan would be next to nothing. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were relatively intact and would better show off the potential of the bombs. Tokyo wouldn't be a good target because we'd already destroyed a good part of the city.

It would depend on the symbolic status of the city.
If Tokyo was being thought of as unbeatable no matter how many bombs the US dropped on it, obliterating it with one or two more may well cause morale to drop massively.

Dakka Bingo! By Ouze
"You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry. 
   
Made in us
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)




The Great State of Texas

purplefood wrote:
biccat wrote:
AustonT wrote:FDR might have dropped the bomb on Tokyo.

Unlikely. Tokyo wasn't a good target.

Keep in mind that at the time, we (or at least the political class) didn't really know, or care about, the long-term effects of radiation. They just knew they had an extremely powerful weapon that could level much of a city from a single blast. The value wasn't necessarily in the destruction the bomb caused, but in the psychological value that a single blast could cause. If we can level much of a city with a single bomb, wiping out whole sections of Japan would be next to nothing. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were relatively intact and would better show off the potential of the bombs. Tokyo wouldn't be a good target because we'd already destroyed a good part of the city.

It would depend on the symbolic status of the city.
If Tokyo was being thought of as unbeatable no matter how many bombs the US dropped on it, obliterating it with one or two more may well cause morale to drop massively.


Tokyo had already been firebombed and was a mass wasteland at the time. More civilians died at Tokyo than Hiroshima.

-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Frazzled wrote:
purplefood wrote:
biccat wrote:
AustonT wrote:FDR might have dropped the bomb on Tokyo.

Unlikely. Tokyo wasn't a good target.

Keep in mind that at the time, we (or at least the political class) didn't really know, or care about, the long-term effects of radiation. They just knew they had an extremely powerful weapon that could level much of a city from a single blast. The value wasn't necessarily in the destruction the bomb caused, but in the psychological value that a single blast could cause. If we can level much of a city with a single bomb, wiping out whole sections of Japan would be next to nothing. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were relatively intact and would better show off the potential of the bombs. Tokyo wouldn't be a good target because we'd already destroyed a good part of the city.

It would depend on the symbolic status of the city.
If Tokyo was being thought of as unbeatable no matter how many bombs the US dropped on it, obliterating it with one or two more may well cause morale to drop massively.


Tokyo had already been firebombed and was a mass wasteland at the time. More civilians died at Tokyo than Hiroshima.

It's symbolic,. I suppose I could have been more clear and said he might have dropped the bomb on Tokyo too. Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't just picked to scare the Japanese. They were picked so we knew what our toys were capable of and their wartime use. FDR hadn't balked at conventional unrestricted bombing, why should he hold back with a doomsday weapon.

 Avatar 720 wrote:
You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.

Come check out my Blood Angels,Crimson Fists, and coming soon Eldar
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391013.page
I have conceded that the Eldar page I started in P&M is their legitimate home. Free Candy! Updated 10/19.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391553.page
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters..
 
   
Made in us
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch





AustonT wrote:FDR hadn't balked at conventional unrestricted bombing, why should he hold back with a doomsday weapon.

We only had two.

I suspect if Japan hadn't surrendered after Nagasaki and we had more, Truman likely would've authorized more bombs to be dropped on strategic sites.

text removed by Moderation team. 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: