Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 A GumyBear wrote:
It's a to hit modifier just as invis is a to hit modifier

It can modify as much as it wants but the fact still remains that 'to hit' is not a characteristic. WS is the characteristic used for 'to hit' but that is not what is modified.
So unless there is a FAQ about this, RAW say that the rule is not in effect here, yet the codex VS BRB rule is. And that rule sais the codex rule takes preccedence.

you mean advanced versus basic... which doesn't actually mean codex versus rulebook unlike fantasy where it does, this is just a misconception based on the fact it says usually between the 2

wargamer1985 wrote:
you mean advanced versus basic... which doesn't actually mean codex versus rulebook unlike fantasy where it does, this is just a misconception based on the fact it says usually between the 2

On rare occasions, a conflict will arise between a rule in this rulebook, and one printed in a codex. Where this occurs, the rule printed in the codex or Army List Entry always takes precedence.

Nope. The rule actually does say, explicitly, rulebook vs codex and the codex takes precedence.

I think Kharne hits on 2+(well really 1+)
because that has how he has always been. All his attacks always hit, just 1/6 of them hit his own guys.

I dont see him missing, his ax is guided by Khorne himself, who can see through silly psyker tricks, i'm forging a narrative.


Otherwise it's codex>rulebook, but I prefer my cinematic narrative.

wasn't there a section in the rulebook about conflicting abilities?

IE if someone has to reroll all successful hits on a twin-linked weapon, they cancel each other out?

I'd say these would just cancel one another out. kharne would hit based on his WS, his unit still hitting on 6's.

 some bloke wrote:
wasn't there a section in the rulebook about conflicting abilities?

IE if someone has to reroll all successful hits on a twin-linked weapon, they cancel each other out?

I'd say these would just cancel one another out. kharne would hit based on his WS, his unit still hitting on 6's.

That was specifically rerolls, if you reroll all hits and reroll all misses then you are left with rolling once, picking up all the dice and rolling again with the second result standing. So for ease of play you just roll once, as no roll from the first will ever stand.

wargamer1985 wrote:
you mean advanced versus basic... which doesn't actually mean codex versus rulebook unlike fantasy where it does, this is just a misconception based on the fact it says usually between the 2

No, I mean codex>BRB which is written literally in the BRB.

Codex>BRB