Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
And why no one talked about the demolisher ? Take one tank commander and have a trio of 3 st 10 ap 2 big blasts of overkill with orders that you let splitt fire and move flat out and stuff, imho i say that they went really better.
General Orange wrote: And why no one talked about the demolisher ? Take one tank commander and have a trio of 3 st 10 ap 2 big blasts of overkill with orders that you let splitt fire and move flat out and stuff, imho i say that they went really better.
I agree.
If youre gonna take a Paskisher, you might as well opt for the 2nd tank to be a Demolisher since youre gonna be pretty in-your-face at the enemy anyway.
Ravenous D wrote: 40K is like a beloved grandparent that is slowly falling into dementia and the rest of the family is in denial about how bad it is.
squidhills wrote: GW is scared of girls. Why do you think they have so much trouble sculpting attractive female models? Because girls have cooties and the staff at GW don't like looking at them for too long because it makes them feel funny in their naughty place.
2000 l 
2000 l 
2000 l 
1500 l 
1000 l 
1000 l 
Blood Ravens (using Ravenguard CT) 1500 l 
1500 l
