Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Yah I haven't been able to take any of what he did seriously because of all of his known lies. I've personally known guys to have invented awards and deployments they never had, a lot of guys actually. Some worse than others.

Going by what he has said he has either murderer US citizens or lied.

I had faint hopes that this might be a half-decent war movie about Rommel fighting the British 8th army for control of Benghazi, but it's not to be.

This movie will probably do well at cinemas, because there is one dakka member in particular (we'll mention no names ) who'll probably watch this film about a 1000 times

 sebster wrote:
But in general, your post basically notes that people use past performance as an indicator of future performance. No gak.

The Rock.
Pain and Gain.
At least the first Bad Boys.

Michael Bay has made some great films. He's also made 3 God-awful Transformer films, and that Pearl Harbour... thing.

And that wasn't my point. My point was people will dismiss it out of hand because it has Bay's name on it.

 H.B.M.C. wrote:

 sebster wrote:
But in general, your post basically notes that people use past performance as an indicator of future performance. No gak.

The Rock.
Pain and Gain.
At least the first Bad Boys.

Michael Bay has made some great films. He's also made 3 God-awful Transformer films, and that Pearl Harbour... thing.

And that wasn't my point. My point was people will dismiss it out of hand because it has Bay's name on it.

I thought Pearl Harbour was a half-decent war film. And the first Bad Boys, not that monstrosity of a sequel, is pretty good as well.

 hotsauceman1 wrote:
But trying to discredit Chris kyle means you are a libritard who is trying to insult all vet.
Chris kyle is scum of the earth, he admitted to enjoy killing, admitted to thinking iragis where sub human and so forth.

Made my day
I laughed real hard

How so?

 Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:
I thought Pearl Harbour was a half-decent war film. And the first Bad Boys, not that monstrosity of a sequel, is pretty good as well.

It wasn't a sequel, it was essentially a remake but with the same lead actors