Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 feeder wrote:

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Is same sex cuckolding a thing?

Private Browsing, to google! It's time to investigate!

Make sure you have your investigation supplies such as notebook and pencil, microscope and some form of lubricating liquid (to ensure smooth workings of your microscope of course) and tissues (to ensure you don't get your lubricant everywhere, of course).

 reds8n wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:
cool. Who's Andorra?

Adrian Mole's girlfriend.

Oh, that brings back some nostalgia.

 A Town Called Malus wrote:

 feeder wrote:

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Is same sex cuckolding a thing?

Private Browsing, to google! It's time to investigate!

Make sure you have your investigation supplies such as notebook and pencil, microscope and some form of lubricating liquid (to ensure smooth workings of your microscope of course) and tissues (to ensure you don't get your lubricant everywhere, of course).

Isn't Dakka Dakka a family-friendly site?

What's not family-friendly about a properly working microscope?

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Could someone provide a translation for people who use real English on the internet?

 Bookwrack wrote:

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Could someone provide a translation for people who use real English on the internet?

CUCK CUCK CUCK CUKC

 Peregrine wrote:

 Bookwrack wrote:

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Could someone provide a translation for people who use real English on the internet?

CUCK CUCK CUCK CUKC

The funny thing is, that makes just as much sense as any other definition that can be discerned.

Using the term "cuck", as it relates to the sexual fetish, makes sense from an insecure d-bag's point of view.

It implies you don't own and can't control your woman. If I was an insecure d-bag, that thought would terrify me.

 feeder wrote:
Using the term "cuck", as it relates to the sexual fetish, makes sense from an insecure d-bag's point of view.

It implies you don't own and can't control your woman. If I was an insecure d-bag, that thought would terrify me.

I think we've reached the point that the only appropriate response is a Futurama gif, because accusing Germany of being 'cucked' when gay marriage involves both genders equally...

Maybe shingouki can come back an explain exactly what he meant, using small words of clear definition that are google safe to search.

This thread has changed from "This is gonna be locked" to "Amazing" in half a page. Priceless.

The "Cuck to Scary Ghost" browser plugin it making this wonderful

 Bookwrack wrote:

 feeder wrote:
Using the term "cuck", as it relates to the sexual fetish, makes sense from an insecure d-bag's point of view.

It implies you don't own and can't control your woman. If I was an insecure d-bag, that thought would terrify me.

I think we've reached the point that the only appropriate response is a Futurama gif, because accusing Germany of being 'cucked' when gay marriage involves both genders equally...

Maybe shingouki can come back an explain exactly what he meant, using small words of clear definition that are google safe to search.

Explanations are not usually part of the package when dealing with persons who use terms like "cuck".

"Poop and scoot" is the usual method of operations.

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Back to /pol with you troll

 feeder wrote:

 Bookwrack wrote:

 feeder wrote:
Using the term "cuck", as it relates to the sexual fetish, makes sense from an insecure d-bag's point of view.

It implies you don't own and can't control your woman. If I was an insecure d-bag, that thought would terrify me.

I think we've reached the point that the only appropriate response is a Futurama gif, because accusing Germany of being 'cucked' when gay marriage involves both genders equally...

Maybe shingouki can come back an explain exactly what he meant, using small words of clear definition that are google safe to search.

Explanations are not usually part of the package when dealing with persons who use terms like "cuck".

"Poop and scoot" is the usual method of operations.

They run in, shout 'cuck', and then run away, spraying a trail of excrement behind them?

Wow, Peregrine really DID get an appropriate picture!

Cuck-a-doodle-poo.

 BigWaaagh wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:
How will this square with the new immigrants? I foresee things going boom.

German law. German votes.
It ain't there country to be brutally honest. They are Guests. If you want to stay, respect the culture of your host nation.

You would not walk down Saudi flaunting your gay or drinking a beer.
Same thing.
When in Rome. Do as romans.

Its the refugee's country too now. Thats what happens when you take in immigrants.

Said by a guy living in a country that was pretty much built by immigrants and is entirely populated...for all purposes...by immigrants or the descendants of immigrants. I genuinely miss this type of ignorance since the US Politics thread was locked. NOT...

You can't really pull that card. If you're going to say anybody who is descended from immigrants counts as an immigrant, then nobody is native to anywhere in the whole world. Everybody's ancestors came from somewhere else.

Only people who actually physically cross a border are immigrants.

 shingouki wrote:
germany is so cucked.

Leave it on /pol/

 Grey Templar wrote:

 BigWaaagh wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:
How will this square with the new immigrants? I foresee things going boom.

German law. German votes.
It ain't there country to be brutally honest. They are Guests. If you want to stay, respect the culture of your host nation.

You would not walk down Saudi flaunting your gay or drinking a beer.
Same thing.
When in Rome. Do as romans.

Its the refugee's country too now. Thats what happens when you take in immigrants.

Said by a guy living in a country that was pretty much built by immigrants and is entirely populated...for all purposes...by immigrants or the descendants of immigrants. I genuinely miss this type of ignorance since the US Politics thread was locked. NOT...

You can't really pull that card. If you're going to say anybody who is descended from immigrants counts as an immigrant, then nobody is native to anywhere in the whole world. Everybody's ancestors came from somewhere else.

Only people who actually physically cross a border are immigrants.

No, actually, in the case of the US...which this reply was addressing specifically and not as a blanket application as you're trying to use for purposes of discreditation...that card is perfectly appropriate to be pulled.

those immigrants will form a significant voting bloc and cannot be ignored. Its only a matter of getting them "on board" or seeing them fall into far right wing camps. in the case of Germany a greater portion are of Turkish descent and they are already more or less pro lgbtq (compared to say, Saudi Arabia) but with even Pakistan now acknowledging trans on their passports I would wonder how much these immigrants are influencing attitudes in their home countries? IMO the Germans did this right, they voted, it passed by a massive majority, there is no controvorsy and noone was disenfranchised on it.

https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article166125488/Muslime-im-Bundestag-stimmten-fuer-Ehe-fuer-alle.html

all 8 muslim MPs voted in favour of the act.

Living in Germany, married to a German, can confirm: Am total beta cuck. (also, I love that the far right has the same attitudes toward homosexuality and women as radical islamists do, they should team up.)

Merkel was savvy to do this, but of course voted against. She's got a good political nose but is a total cynic - letting the refugees in was the first non-cynical thing she's done in forever and she got crucified over it.

 Da Boss wrote:
also, I love that the far right has the same attitudes toward homosexuality and women as radical islamists do, they should team up

Radical islamists are the far right, just of a different flavour (Islam instead of Christianity, middle east instead of Europe/USA)

 A Town Called Malus wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 AlmightyWalrus wrote:
I like how you managed to turn this into a "darn refugees" thread in less than a page. Could you maybe not so we don't get yet another thread locked?

1. I've asked my question and moved on. As there are multiple cultures in Germany now I was wondering how that would play out.
2. I must have missed the last refugee thread you are referring to.

How many other European nations permit same sex weddings?

Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, UK (barring Northern Ireland because it is run by religious fanatics), Iceland, Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Finland and Sweden have full same sex marriage. Others have civil partnerships whilst some eastern european countries have no same sex partnerships at all.

As for your question of how this will go down with immigrant populations, if those immigrants don't like it they can petition their representatives to seek a repeal in the Reichstag, just like anybody else.

Italy is the major european nation without anything even remotely close to a civil partership between homosexual individuals. Gay people can only date each other, they have some rights as a couple, but not like a marriage. It's a shame. The problem here is the damn vatican that influences politics. Our politicians know that and none of them, even the radicals or the progressists, dare to go against the church.

 Blackie wrote:

 A Town Called Malus wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 AlmightyWalrus wrote:
I like how you managed to turn this into a "darn refugees" thread in less than a page. Could you maybe not so we don't get yet another thread locked?

1. I've asked my question and moved on. As there are multiple cultures in Germany now I was wondering how that would play out.
2. I must have missed the last refugee thread you are referring to.

How many other European nations permit same sex weddings?

Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, UK (barring Northern Ireland because it is run by religious fanatics), Iceland, Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Finland and Sweden have full same sex marriage. Others have civil partnerships whilst some eastern european countries have no same sex partnerships at all.

As for your question of how this will go down with immigrant populations, if those immigrants don't like it they can petition their representatives to seek a repeal in the Reichstag, just like anybody else.

Italy is the major european nation without anything even remotely close to a civil partership between homosexual individuals. Gay people can only date each other, they have some rights as a couple, but not like a marriage. It's a shame. The problem here is the damn vatican that influences politics. Our politicians know that and none of them, even the radicals or the progressists, dare to go against the church.

Chin up, Ireland used to be like that and look at them now.

 Blackie wrote:

 A Town Called Malus wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 AlmightyWalrus wrote:
I like how you managed to turn this into a "darn refugees" thread in less than a page. Could you maybe not so we don't get yet another thread locked?

1. I've asked my question and moved on. As there are multiple cultures in Germany now I was wondering how that would play out.
2. I must have missed the last refugee thread you are referring to.

How many other European nations permit same sex weddings?

Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, UK (barring Northern Ireland because it is run by religious fanatics), Iceland, Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Finland and Sweden have full same sex marriage. Others have civil partnerships whilst some eastern european countries have no same sex partnerships at all.

As for your question of how this will go down with immigrant populations, if those immigrants don't like it they can petition their representatives to seek a repeal in the Reichstag, just like anybody else.

Italy is the major european nation without anything even remotely close to a civil partership between homosexual individuals. Gay people can only date each other, they have some rights as a couple, but not like a marriage. It's a shame. The problem here is the damn vatican that influences politics. Our politicians know that and none of them, even the radicals or the progressists, dare to go against the church.

Wikipedia says Italy has recognised same same sex civil unions since June of last year.

Wiki is not always accurate though, unless you're researching British carrier based aircraft from WWII...

Corsairs Superior Seafires Inferior!

Funny how referendums were all the rage a few years back and now suddenly when it won't go the politicians way they snatch the rug from under the populous.

 A Town Called Malus wrote:

 Blackie wrote:

 A Town Called Malus wrote:

 Frazzled wrote:

 AlmightyWalrus wrote:
I like how you managed to turn this into a "darn refugees" thread in less than a page. Could you maybe not so we don't get yet another thread locked?

1. I've asked my question and moved on. As there are multiple cultures in Germany now I was wondering how that would play out.
2. I must have missed the last refugee thread you are referring to.

How many other European nations permit same sex weddings?

Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, UK (barring Northern Ireland because it is run by religious fanatics), Iceland, Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Finland and Sweden have full same sex marriage. Others have civil partnerships whilst some eastern european countries have no same sex partnerships at all.

As for your question of how this will go down with immigrant populations, if those immigrants don't like it they can petition their representatives to seek a repeal in the Reichstag, just like anybody else.

Italy is the major european nation without anything even remotely close to a civil partership between homosexual individuals. Gay people can only date each other, they have some rights as a couple, but not like a marriage. It's a shame. The problem here is the damn vatican that influences politics. Our politicians know that and none of them, even the radicals or the progressists, dare to go against the church.

Wikipedia says Italy has recognised same same sex civil unions since June of last year.

That's right, in 2016 civil unions (even eterosexual ones) got some rights, but it's still nothing comparable to what other european countries grant to homosexual relationships.

 Blackie wrote:


That's right, in 2016 civil unions (even eterosexual ones) got some rights, but it's still nothing comparable to what other european countries grant to homosexual relationships.

Baby steps. Hopefully they'll reach full same sex marriage in the near future.

Just for the record: homosexuals in Germany could already have a legal marriage-like relationship for long.
This referendum is mainly about calling it "marriage" and not "marriage-like", and some rights coming along with that term, i.e. adoption.

But (AFAIK) for the sake of taxes, inheritance, lawsuits,... "marriage-like" couples already had the same rights as "married" couples.

I think the right for adoption is the only big new thing here. And of course annoying traditionalists that claim that the term marriage is only applicaple for a man and a woman