Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/03/28 01:25:06
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Big changes in the cast of anything - be it books or shows or films can be very jarring on viewers. Heck in the world of TV/film if you change too many key character actors at the same time it can entirely disengage fans suddenly. A few here and there you can swap in and out or change out, but you can't just change everything.
People get attached to characters, invested in them and losing them means that you're basically starting the show over again.
That's often why series like Avatar the Last Airbender do new whole seasonal blocks when they do it; they know that a "new show" with its own story and seasons can have its own character roster much better than trying to keep it all as one mega-seasonal series. Even if the content if the episodes is identical.
Even big time jumps in the first episode are tricky to manage. People rapidly firm first impressions. That's why TV shows that often do that kind of trick will often use flashbacks. You start with the current state and characters then flashback to the before-times to show how things started. That way the first characters your audience is identifying with are the ones that will be the main characters in the story and everything else is a "flashback"
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/03/29 00:55:26
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Also, after seeing a comment on Facebook about Lower Decks crew crossing over into other shows, I now want to see more 'Trouble with Tribbles' crossovers, where successive different crews find themselves mixed up in that story and have to navigate events without screwing up an increasingly complicated mess of timelines...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/03/29 07:37:35
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Will we ever reach the point where Klingons and Tribbles can just get along?
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 02:48:13
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
I've been watching a lot of TNG and DS9 and I've noticed that there are no toilets in the Brig.
No bathrooms at all when you are locked up seems cruel and unusual punishment for the Federation.
Unless, they transport your waste away.
What do you, the viewers at home, think?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 04:13:12
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
In Star Trek V, Kirk pops the toilet out from the wall.
There's also a pop-out sink shown in a couple of TNG episodes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 11:42:04
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
I think all the Federation cell furniture is wall secreted. But, DS9 is a Cardassian facility. And I can well see them just leaving you to besmirch your pantaloons.
Which would imply Odo and Station Security do toilet trips with those held?
Cursory google turned up no Technical Layout, sadly.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 12:09:28
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Watched the episode last night where Sisko is held at Starfleet HE'S Brig.
There is not a single, anything in his cell besides a bench. Admiral Leyton offers to get him some food.
So that means that replicators aren't even nearby.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 12:23:08
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
Well, you don’t want to be giving a prisoner any kind of replicator. Thats just asking for trouble.
And there may well be a difference between a Holding Cell and a “see you in a few days/weeks/months/years/never” cells.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 12:55:42
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Well, you don’t want to be giving a prisoner any kind of replicator. Thats just asking for trouble.
And there may well be a difference between a Holding Cell and a “see you in a few days/weeks/months/years/never” cells.
Admiral Leyton does say (to Sisko) that he'll "get out in a few days." Still a few days with nothing but a bench seems a little harsh for Starfleet.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 12:57:55
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Toilets is something most sci-fi and and fantasy never has. In real world series they don't need to show it cause we know where they are and most scenes/houses and such will have hints as to where they are in the layout.
But in fantasy and sci-fi we rarely if never see toilets. Heck do the exploded diagrams of the Enterprise and such even show them.
We know they are there, but in general we never see them used nor featured. It's not even a point of event that characters leave to relieve themselves.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 13:02:46
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Overread wrote:Toilets is something most sci-fi and and fantasy never has. In real world series they don't need to show it cause we know where they are and most scenes/houses and such will have hints as to where they are in the layout.
But in fantasy and sci-fi we rarely if never see toilets. Heck do the exploded diagrams of the Enterprise and such even show them.
We know they are there, but in general we never see them used nor featured. It's not even a point of event that characters leave to relieve themselves.
The Defiant-class has toilets in its deck plans. I know because a certain player in my STA game tried pointing their lack of existence out, but I found them.
They are communal (unless you are an officer) on the Defiant.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/15 20:58:01
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
... Because, again, the facilities pop out from the wall...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/16 12:00:16
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Foxy Wildborne
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:I think all the Federation cell furniture is wall secreted. But, DS9 is a Cardassian facility. And I can well see them just leaving you to besmirch your pantaloons.
Which would imply Odo and Station Security do toilet trips with those held?
Who do you think is the bucket
|
The old meta is dead and the new meta struggles to be born. Now is the time of munchkins. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 20:48:53
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Just a stray thought...
As I have not seen all of Discovery, Strange New Worlds, or Short Treks, or Section 31 I could not disagree with someone today.
Has there ever been a giant robot/mech in Star Trek? I thought not... but I've been wrong before.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 22:52:17
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
Nothing that I can think of.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 22:54:46
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
I don't want to say that one has never happened because there's every chance that one might be there in some side episode. But big mechs are not really a thing in the Startrek universe. So even if there is one somewhere its very much going to be a one-off
There might have been one in some video game made; or you might be mixing it up with something like Andromeda which did have some (rarely seen) mechs.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 23:02:47
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Overread wrote:I don't want to say that one has never happened because there's every chance that one might be there in some side episode. But big mechs are not really a thing in the Startrek universe. So even if there is one somewhere its very much going to be a one-off
There might have been one in some video game made; or you might be mixing it up with something like Andromeda which did have some (rarely seen) mechs.
I was told there was, and I couldn't remember one... at all, even in in classic Trek large computers rarely moved and most robots were man sized or smaller.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 23:06:01
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
I wonder if it appeared in the classic original series animation ?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 23:10:59
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Overread wrote:I wonder if it appeared in the classic original series animation ?
Or Lower Decks... I forgot all about the cartoons.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/25 23:36:11
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
How could you forget about Fortress Tiberius?
From the Star Trek/Transformers crossover.
|
You Pays Your Money, and You Takes Your Chances.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/29 02:01:32
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Secret Force Behind the Rise of the Tau
USA
|
I'm not saying the world needs a Mobile Suit Gundam / Star Trek crossover anime, but I mean, would the world really be any worse if we had one?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/29 02:20:13
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Keeper of the Flame
|
We've been blessed by a lack of weeb culture in the Trek fandom, and I'd personally like to keep it that way.
|
www.classichammer.com
For 4-6th WFB, 2-5th 40k, and similar timeframe gaming
Looking for dice from the new AOS boxed set and Dark Imperium on the cheap. Let me know if you can help.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/29 07:41:09
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
So, I shouldn't post the Star Trek Mecha I've found online?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/30 04:28:48
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Keeper of the Flame
|
Lathe Biosas wrote:So, I shouldn't post the Star Trek Mecha I've found online?
I don't care about fan work, it's no different than the shipper Rule 34 stuff.
|
www.classichammer.com
For 4-6th WFB, 2-5th 40k, and similar timeframe gaming
Looking for dice from the new AOS boxed set and Dark Imperium on the cheap. Let me know if you can help.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/30 10:37:33
Subject: Re:Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
|
Just Tony wrote:Lathe Biosas wrote:So, I shouldn't post the Star Trek Mecha I've found online?
I don't care about fan work, it's no different than the shipper Rule 34 stuff.
A lot of it comes from Lower Decks and the Star Trek Comic Books.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/30 13:51:05
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Keeper of the Flame
|
Nifty that you like it. Still don't care, and I don't count the comics as Canon as they tend to contradict far too much stuff
|
www.classichammer.com
For 4-6th WFB, 2-5th 40k, and similar timeframe gaming
Looking for dice from the new AOS boxed set and Dark Imperium on the cheap. Let me know if you can help.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/04/30 15:15:40
Subject: Star Trek: general discussion-Picard, Discovery, Lower Decks (and Orville)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
LordofHats wrote:I'm not saying the world needs a Mobile Suit Gundam / Star Trek crossover anime, but I mean, would the world really be any worse if we had one?
Yes. Indubitably yes.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
|