Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 13:43:35
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
Spawn of Chaos
Irvine , Scotland
|
Has anyone got any ideas on how i can make a decent Raven Guard army using Assault squads alot?
Im pretty new to actually playin wh40k and i dont know how i can make a good army using Assault squads etc
what are there strengths and weaknesses and when would it be good to play them.
any ideas?
Xylthian
|
Do you hear the voices to? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 13:55:28
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
The problem with ravenguard is that vanila marines are not good in close combat.
However, I would advice you to take shrike, and eather put him in a squad of assault marines or asault terminators. Assault terminators already have a pretty bad ass reputation in warhammer 40k. Having one start 18" away from you with fleet it not very funn.
I would also get some drop pods or scouts, whoever has teleport homers. If scouts, then stick them in the landspeeder that can carry troops and drive in. Then have a librarian with a second unit of assault terminators and teleport in using the teleport spell.
On your second turn you should be abel to assault with 2 squads of assault terminators terminators! Go with moastly hammer and stormshield. To keep the cost down on troop choises I would advice moastly scouts. Also have some anti tank so that you can bring landraiders and other transports DOWN.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 14:47:38
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
RogueSangre
|
What Niiai has described is called an Alpha-Strike list, and is the most viable tactic to use with Shrike. The strategy is simply to inflict as much damage as possible first turn. To that end, CC scouts in a Land Speeders Storm, Dreadnoughts and Sternguard in Drop Pods, and Shrike with Assaul Terminators are all good ideas.
Assault squads, as have been said, aren't very good in Codex: Space Marines. They lack anti-tank ability, and aren't very good as CC troops, when compared to many other options out there. That said, if you have your heart set on such a thing, look into picking up copy of Imperial Armor 8: Raid on Kastorel Novem, which is available from Forge World. It has a special Raven Guard character that makes Assault Squads troops choices. Who knows. Maybe if they aren't competing with Land Speeders and Bikers for Fast Attack slots, they're more valuable.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 14:53:23
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
The poster Flavius Infernus has a lot of experience with this, and has posted a bit about it here and elsewhere.
LMS if I can dig up any threads...
This thread is primarily about BA AMs vs. IG power blobs, but Flavius chips in some excellent info about regular AMs:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/329697.page
Quick post about the weaknesses of AMs:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/330813.page#2173185
Some tactics (including some contrast between Raven Guard (vanilla with Shrike AMs vs. BAs):
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/327467.page#2108605
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/321143.page#2002850
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/323807.page#2064248
Quick notes on the list when he first built it:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/287111.page#1454364
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/12/18 15:05:11
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/18 14:55:29
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Load up on assault termies. With fleet from shrike, they can really pound some heads in.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 18:13:56
Subject: Re:Raven Guard help
|
 |
Spawn of Chaos
Irvine , Scotland
|
Thanks for all the help
|
Do you hear the voices to? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 18:50:21
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
I'd make a RG army based on the BA codex.
In this way, you can design a DoA army.
Very nice to play.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/20 14:19:57
Subject: Raven Guard help
|
 |
Plastictrees
|
I posted my lists and tactical notes on my Shrike army and its assault marines as an army profile
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Ravenguard_Shrike
Pictures coming soon.
It's possible and fun, but not an auto-win. Check it out.
|
"The complete or partial destruction of the enemy must be regarded as the sole object of all engagements.... Direct annihilation of the enemy's forces must always be the dominant consideration." Karl von Clausewitz |
|
 |
 |
|